discussed Cited "see" Pueschel v. Connecticut (2×) See Gaytan v. Cassidy, 403 U.S. 902 , 91 S.Ct. 2202 , 29 L.Ed.2d 677 , vacating and remanding, 317 F.Supp. 46 ; Pollion v. Lewis, 403 U.S. 902 , 91 S.Ct. 2212 , 29 L.Ed.2d 678 , vacating and remanding, 320 F.Supp. 1343 ; Latham v. Tynan, 404 U.S. 807 , 92 S.Ct. 117 , 30 L.Ed.2d 39 vacating and remanding. 435 F.2d 1248 . 2 The State also argues that petitioner cannot raise Bell as a defense to his criminal charge because he has chosen not to challenge his suspension by seeking available judicial review of the suspension itself, so that he has not raised his contentions in the proper state forum…