United Transp. Union v. United States, 406 U.S. 964 (1972). · Go Syfert
United Transp. Union v. United States, 406 U.S. 964 (1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Boston Edison Co. v. Board of Assessors of Watertown (mass, 1982-08-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Boston Edison Co. v. Board of Assessors of Watertown (2×)
Mass. · 1982 · confidence medium
Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Williams, 406 U.S. 964, 967 (1972).
cited Cited "see" People v. Plewka
Ill. App. Ct. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See People v. Mueller (1973), 54 Ill.2d 189 , 295 N.E.2d 705 and People v. Keegan (1971), 52 Ill.2d 147 , 286 N.E.2d 345 , appeal dismissed and certiorari denied, 406 U.S. 964 (1972).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Valadez v. Graham
M.D. Fla. · 1979 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Goodwin v. Wyman, 330 F.Supp. 1038, 1041 (S.D.N.Y. 1971) aff’d 406 U.S. 964 , 92 S.Ct. 2420 , 32 L.Ed.2d 664 (1972).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Muskgrove
Ill. App. Ct. · 1976 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also People v. Keegan, 52 Ill. 2d 147 , 286 N.E.2d 348 (1971), cert. denied (1972), 406 U.S. 964 , indecent liberties with a child/contributing to the sexual delinquency of a child).” After we had discussed the aggravated assault/armed violence statutory framework, we concluded in the Graham case, 25 Ill.
cited Cited "see, e.g." People v. Graham
Ill. App. Ct. · 1975 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also People v. Keegan, 52 Ill.2d 147 , 286 N.E.2d 348 (1971), cert. denied (1972), 406 U.S. 964 , indecent liberties with a child/contributing to the sexual delinquency of a child).
United Transportation Union
v.
United States
No. 71-1209.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 7, 1972.
406 U.S. 964
Consideration, Took.
Published

Affirmed on appeal from D. C. D. C. Mr. Justice Douglas dissents from the affirmance.

Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.