green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Bear Enterprises v. County of Greenville
See Golden v. Planning Bd. of Town of Ramapo, 30 N.Y. (2d) 359, 334 N.Y.S. (2d) 138, 285 N.E. (2d) 291, 63 A.L.R. (3d) 1157 (1972), appeal dismissed, 409 U.S. 1003 , 93 S.Ct. 436 , 34 L.Ed. (2d) 294 (1972) (ordinance limiting the use of property will not be held unconstitutional unless it is shown to be unreasonable in terms of necessity or to have caused such a diminution in value as to be tantamount to confiscation).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hampton v. Richland County
See Golden v. Planning Bd. of Town of Ramapo , 30 N.Y. (2d) 359, 334 N.Y.S. (2d) 138, 285 N.E. (2d) 291, 63 A.L.R. (3d) 1157 (1972), appeal dismissed , 409 U.S. 1003 , 93 S.Ct. 440 , 34 L.Ed. (2d) 294 (1972) (ordinance limiting the use of property will not be held unconstitutional unless it is shown to be unreasonable in terms of necessity or to have caused such a diminution in value as to be tantamount to confiscation).
discussed
Cited "see"
Suffolk Housing Services v. Town of Brookhaven
See Trafficante, 409 U.S. at 209-10, 93 S. Ct. 364 * * * “The fact that the conduct complained of adversely affected white as well as nonwhite people, however, is not by itself an obstacle to relief under the Fair Housing Act.
discussed
Cited "see"
Brandon v. State
See Shippy v. State, 556 S.W.2d 246 (Tex.Cr.App.1977), cert. denied 434 U.S. 935 , 98 S.Ct. 422 , 34 L.Ed.2d 294 (1977); Boulware v. State, 542 S.W.2d 677 (Tex.Cr.App.1976), cert. denied 430 U.S. 959 , 97 S.Ct. 1610 , 51 L.Ed.2d 811 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Oakwood at Madison, Inc. v. Township of Madison
(2×)
See Golden v. Ramapo Planning Bd., 30 N.Y. 2d 359 , 334 N.Y.S. 2d 138 , 285 N.E. 2d 291 (Ct. App. 1972), appeal dismissed 409 U.S. 1003 , 93 S.Ct. 436 , 34 L.Ed. 2d 294 (1972); Constr.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Construction Industry Association of Sonoma County, a California Nonprofit Corporation v. The City of Petaluma, a California Charter City
(2×)
See, e. g., Golden v. Planning Board of Town of Ramapo, 30 N.Y.2d 359 , 334 N.Y.S.2d 138 , 285 N.E.2d 291 , appeal dismissed, 409 U.S. 1003 , 93 S.Ct. 436 , 34 L.Ed.2d 294 (1972); National Land & Investment Co. v. Kohn, 419 Pa. 504 , 215 A.2d 597 (1965); Note, Phased Zoning: Regulation of the Tempo and Sequence of Land Development, 26 Stan.L.Rev. 585, 605 (1974).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
So. Burl. Cty. NAACP v. Tp. of Mt. Laurel
(3×)
See, e.g., Golden v. Ramapo Planning Board, 30 N.Y. 2d 359 , 334 N.Y.S. 2 d 138, 285 N.E. 2d 291 (1972), appeal dismissed 409 U.S. 1003 , 93 S.Ct. 436 , 34 L.Ed.2d 294 (1972); Construction Industry Ass'n of Sonoma County v. Petaluma, 375 F. Supp. 574 (N.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Steel Hill Development, Inc. v. Town of Sanbornton
(2×)
See also Golden v. Planning Board of Town of Ramapo, 30 N.Y.2d 359 , 334 N.Y.S.2d 138 , 285 N.E.2d 291 (1972), appeal dismissed 409 U.S. 1003 , 93 S.Ct. 440 , 34 L.Ed.2d 294 (1972).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Walker
v.
Kentucky
v.
Kentucky
No. 71-6752.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 13, 1972.
Cited by 19 opinions | Published
Appeal from Ct. App. Ky. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.