Richmond Sch. Bd. v. Bd. of Educ., 412 U.S. 92 (1973). · Go Syfert
Search
Richmond Sch. Bd. v. Bd. of Educ., 412 U.S. 92 (1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
144 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Stanley v. Darlington County School District (scd, 1995-03-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Stanley v. Darlington County School District
D.S.C. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bradley v. School Bd., 338 F.Supp. 67, 229-30 (E.D.Va.), rev’d on other grounds, 462 F.2d 1058 (4th Cir.1972), aff'd by an equally divided Court, 412 U.S. 92 , 93 S.Ct. 1952 , 36 L.Ed.2d 171 (1973).
discussed Cited "see" Bradley v. Baliles (2×)
E.D. Va. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See School Board v. State Board of Education, 412 U.S. 92 , 93 S.Ct. 1952 , 36 L.Ed.2d 771 (1973).
discussed Cited "see" Rebecca E. Henry v. Clarksdale Municipal Separate School District (2×)
5th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bradley v. School Bd. of Richmond, 462 F.2d 1058, 1061, 1069 (4th Cir. 1972) (en banc), aff’d by an equally divided court, 412 U.S. 92 , 93 S.Ct. 1952 , 36 L.Ed.2d 771 (1973). .
discussed Cited "see" Vivian Calhoun, Deborah Birt, Intervenors-Appellants, Emma Armour, Intervenors-Appellants v. Ed S. Cook (2×)
5th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond, Virginia, 462 F.2d 1058 (1972) (en banc), affirmed by equally divided court, 412 U.S. 92 , 93 S.Ct. 1952 , 36 L.Ed.2d 771 (1973); Spencer v. Kugler, 326 F.Supp. 1235 (D.N.J.1971), affirmed in memorandum decision, 404 U.S. 1027 , 92 S.Ct. 707 , 30 L.Ed.2d 723 (1972).
discussed Cited "see" Warren H. Wheeler v. The Durham County Board of Education, a Body Politic (2×)
4th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bradley v. School Bd. of City of Richmond, Virginia, 462 F.2d 1058 (4th Cir. 1972), aff’d by an equally divided court, 412 U.S. 92 , 93 S.Ct. 1952 , 36 L.Ed.2d 771 (1973). 7 .
discussed Cited "see" Morgan v. Hennigan (2×)
D. Mass. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bradley v. Virginia State Board of Education, E.D.Va.1972, 338 F. Supp. 67 , rev’d 4 Cir. 1972, 462 F.2d 1058 , aff’d 412 U.S. 92 , 93 S.Ct. 1952 , 36 L.Ed.2d 771 (1973) (per curiam).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.
SCOTUS · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
In Richmond v. United States, 422 U. S. 358 (1975), for example, this Court denounced Richmond’s decision to annex part of an adjacent county at a time when the city’s black population was nearing 50% because it was “infected by the impermissible purpose of denying the right to vote based on race through perpetuating white majority power to exclude Negroes from office.” Id., at 373 ; see also id., at 382 (Brennan, J., dissenting) (describing Richmond’s “flagrantly discriminatory purpose . . . to avert a transfer of political control to what was fast becoming a black-population majo…
examined Cited "see, e.g." Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District No. 1 (4×)
8th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
Pasadena City Board of Education v. Spangler, 427 U.S. 424, 436 , 96 S.Ct. 2697, 2704 , 49 L.Ed.2d 599 (1976); see also Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond, 462 F.2d 1058, 1066 (4th Cir.1972), aff'd mem. by an equally divided court, 412 U.S. 92 , 93 S.Ct. 1952 , 36 L.Ed.2d 771 (1973). 239 I would remand the case to the district court only for further consideration of appropriate relief for intradistrict constitutional violations and for further consideration of the current segregative effect resulting from the Granite Mountain deannexation and for consideration of an appropriate remedy…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." The Goldsboro City Board of Education v. The Wayne County Board of Education (2×)
4th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Bradley v. School Board of the City of Richmond, Virginia, 462 F.2d 1058, 1066 (4th Cir.1972), affd without opinion by an equally divided court, 412 U.S. 92 , 93 S.Ct. 1952 , 36 L.Ed.2d 771 (1973), where the court rejected an interdistrict remedy and commented on demographic change in Richmond: We think that the root causes of the concentration of blacks in the inner cities of America are simply not known and that the district court could not realistically place on the counties the responsibility for the effect that inner city decay has had on the public schools of Richmond.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Berry v. Cooper (2×)
5th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., School Board of City of Richmond v. State Board of Education, 1973, 412 U.S. 92 , 93 S.ct. 1952, 36 L.Ed.2d 771 ; Rice v. Sioux City Cemetery, 1954, 348 U.S. 880 , 75 S.Ct. 122 , 99 L.Ed. 693 , on rehearing, 1955, 349 U.S. 70 , 73, 75 S.Ct. 614 , 99 L.Ed. 897 ; United States v. Holmes, 5 Cir., 1976, 537 F.2d 227 ; Carter v. United States, 5 Cir., 1963, 325 F.2d 697 , cert. denied, 1964, 377 U.S. 946 , 84 S.Ct. 1353 , 12 L.Ed.2d 308 ; 5 Am.Jur.2d, Appeal and Error, § 902, pp. 338, 339.
examined Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Jeffrey Leonard Holmes (4×)
5th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., School Board of City of Richmond v. State Board of Education, 1973, 412 U.S. 92 , 93 S.Ct. 1952 , 36 L.Ed.2d 771 ; Rice v. Sioux City Cemetery, 1954, 348 U.S. 880 , 75 S.Ct. 122 , 99 L.Ed. 693 , on rehearing, 1955, 349 U.S. 70 , 73, 75 S.Ct. 614 , 99 L.Ed. 897 ; Carter v. United States, 5 Cir., 1963, 325 F.2d 697 , cert. denied 1964, 377 U.S. 946 , 84 S.Ct. 1353 , 12 L.Ed.2d 308 ; 5 Am.Jur.2d, Appeal and Error, § 902, pp. 338, 339.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SCHOOL BOARD OF CITY OF RICHMOND, VIRGINIA, ET AL.
v.
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF VIRGINIA ET AL.
72-549.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1973.
412 U.S. 92
Per Curiam.
Cited by 52 opinions  |  Published
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT.

George B. Little argued the cause for petitioners in No. 72-549. With him on the briefs was Conrad B. Mattox, Jr. William T. Coleman, Jr., argued the cause for petitioners in No. 72-550. With him on the briefs were Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Norman J. Chachkin, Louis R. Louis, William L. Taylor, and Anthony G. Amsterdam.

Philip B. Kurland argued the cause for respondents in both cases. With him on the brief were Edward I. Rothschild, Andrew P. Miller, Attorney General of Virginia, William G. Broaddus and D. Patrick Lacy, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, Frederick T. Gray, Walter E. Rogers, J. Segar Gravatt, R. D. McIlwaine III, L. Paul Byrne, and J. Mercer White, Jr.

Solicitor General Griswold argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging affirmance in both cases. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Pottinger, A. Raymond Randolph, Jr., Brian K. Landsberg, and John C. Hoyle.[†]

[*93] PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

[*] Together with No. 72-550, Bradley et al. v. State Board of Education of Virginia et al., also on certiorari to the same court.

[†] Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal in both cases were filed by Stephen J. Pollak, Richard M. Sharp, and David Rubin for the National Education Association, and by Melvin L. Wulf, Sanford Jay Rosen, and Philip Hirschkop for the American Civil Liberties Union et al. Margie Pitts Hames filed a brief for the Black Parents of Atlanta, Georgia, as amicus curiae urging reversal in No. 72-550.

Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance in both cases were filed by David I. Caplan for the Jewish Rights Council, and by Harold H. Fuhrman for the National Suburban League, Ltd. Charles S. Conley and Floyd B. McKissick filed a brief for the Congress of Racial Equality as amicus curiae urging affirmance in No. 72-549.