green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats, Inc. v. Rubin
See Jones v. Butz, 374 F.Supp. 1284, 1292-93 (S.D.N.Y.1974), aff'd, 419 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 22 , 42 L.Ed.2d 36 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats, Inc. v. Rubin
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Jones v. Butz, 374 F.Supp. 1284 (S.D.N.Y.) (granting intervention application of seven individuals and five religious organizations because they had “an undoubted interest in the legislation under consideration ... as it affects the production of kosher meat”), affd 419 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 22 , 42 L.Ed.2d 36 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
George Barghout v. Bureau Of Kosher Meat And Food Control
See Jones v. Butz, 374 F.Supp. 1284, 1292 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 419 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 22 , 42 L.Ed.2d 36 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Barghout v. Bureau of Kosher Meat & Food Control
See Jones v. Butz, 374 F.Supp. 1284, 1292 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 419 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 22 , 42 L.Ed.2d 36 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ran-Dav's County Kosher, Inc. v. State
(2×)
County of Allegheny, supra, 492 U.S. at 613 n. 59, 109 S.Ct. at 3111 n. 59, 106 L.Ed. 2d at 507 n. 59; see Jones v. Butz, 374 F. Supp. 1284, 1292-93 (S.D.N.Y. 1974), aff'd, 419 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 22 , 42 L.Ed. 2d 36 (1974) (holding that the Humane Slaughter Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 1901 et seq. (1970), permissibly accommodates the free exercise of religion by exempting persons of Jewish faith from generally applicable statutory guidelines that proscribe practices mandated by the laws of kashrut). *166 The regulations at issue in this case do not constitute permissible accommodation of Orthodox Juda…
discussed
Cited "see"
Colo. Dept. of Soc. Serv. v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RS
Bonnett v. State, 155 N.J.Super. 520, 529 , 382 A.2d 1175, 1180 , aff'd, 78 N.J. 325 , 395 A.2d 194 (1978) (citations omitted); accord, Lindsay v. Wyman, 372 F.Supp. 1360 (S.D.N.Y.1974), *15 aff'd sub nom, Beame v. Lavine, 419 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 21 , 42 L.Ed.2d 35 (1974) (mem. op.).
discussed
Cited "see"
Colorado Department of Social Services v. Board of County Commissioners
Bonnett v. State, 155 N.J.Super. 520, 529 , 382 A.2d 1175, 1180 , aff'd, 78 N.J. 325 , 395 A.2d 194 (1978) (citations omitted); accord, Lindsay v. Wyman, 372 F.Supp. 1360 (S.D.N.Y.1974), aff 'd sub nom, Beame v. Lavine, 419 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 21 , 42 L.Ed.2d 35 (1974) (mem. op.).
cited
Cited "see"
Ludwig v. Massachusetts
See Almeida v. Lucey, 372 F. Supp. 109 (Mass.), summarily aff'd, 419 U. S. 806 (1974); Boyle v. Registrar of Motor Vehicles, Mass. , 331 N. E. 2d 52, 53 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frank v. State
(2×)
See also 16 U.S.C.A. § 668a (Supp. 1979), which authorizes the taking of bald eagles "for the religious purposes of Indian tribes," and 25 C.F.R. § 11 .87H (1978), which declares it to be lawful for one to "buy, sell, possess, or use peyote in any form in connection with the religious practices, sacraments or services of the Native American Church." 21 C.F.R. § 1307.31 (1979) also exempts the religious use of peyote. [10] Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398, 407 , 83 S.Ct. 1790, 1795 , 10 L.Ed.2d 965, 972 (1963). [11] See notes 2 and 3 supra. [12] See, e.g., Jones v. Butz, 374 F. Supp. 1284, 1…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cahill
v.
Cedar County, Iowa
v.
Cedar County, Iowa
No. 73-1495.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1974.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. N. D. Iowa.