green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
10.6 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“.. . it is fundamental that a deprivation of constitutional rights may not be justified upon economic considerations”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
"... it is fundamental that a deprivation of constitutional rights may not be justified upon economic considerations"
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
" 'young persons' is not a cognizable class"
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Lopes
young persons' is not a 10 cognizable class
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Lopes
young persons' is not a cognizable class
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States ex rel. Boothe v. Superintendent, Woodbourne Correctional Facility
.. . it is fundamental that a deprivation of constitutional rights may not be justified upon economic considerations
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
US Ex Rel. Boothe v. SUPERINTENDENT, ETC.
... it is fundamental that a deprivation of constitutional rights may not be justified upon economic considerations
discussed
Cited "see"
Hannon v. Allen
In view of the likelihood that Maine officials will necessarily have to play a role in the remedy and because of the fundamental nature of the right involved, we think that Maine authorities may not wash their hands of their obligation to insure access to Maine courts simply by transferring a prisoner out of state; See Inmates of Suffolk County Jail v. Eisenstadt, 494 F.2d 1196, 1198-99 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 977 , 95 S.Ct. 239 , *76 42 L.Ed.2d 189 (1974); 34 M.R.S.A. s 707 (transferred prisoner retains “his right to legal process in the courts of this State”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Inmates of Suffolk County Jail v. Dennis J. Kearney
(2×)
See Inmates of Suffolk County Jail v. Eisenstadt, 360 F.Supp. 676 (D.Mass.1973), aff'd, 494 F.2d 1196 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 977 , 95 S.Ct. 239 , 42 L.Ed.2d 189 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles R. Hawkins, Jr. v. Frank A. Hall
Concord Advisory Bd. v. Hall, 447 F.Supp. 398, 404 (D.Mass.1978); see Inmates of Suffolk County Jail v. Eisenstadt, 360 F.Supp. 676, 688 (D.Mass.1973), aff’d, 494 F.2d 1196 (1st Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 977 , 95 S.Ct. 239 , 42 L.Ed.2d 189 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Leon F. Rich v. George A. Zitnay, Etc.
In view of the likelihood that Maine officials will necessarily have to play a role in the remedy and because of the fundamental nature of the right involved, we think that Maine authorities may not wash their hands of their obligation to insure access to Maine courts simply by transferring a prisoner out of state; See Inmates of Suffolk County Jail v. Eisenstadt, 494 F.2d 1196, 1198-99 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 977 , 95 S.Ct. 239 , 42 L.Ed.2d 189 (1974); 34 M.R.S.A. § 707 (transferred prisoner retains “his right to legal process in the courts of this State”).
discussed
Cited "see"
James Dimarzo v. Robert E. Cahill, Frank A. Hall, James Dimarzo v. Robert E. Cahill
(2×)
See Inmates of Suffolk County Jail v. Eisenstadt, 494 F.2d 1196, 1199 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 977 , 95 S.Ct. 239 , 42 L.Ed.2d 189 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harry R. Haldeman, United States of America v. John D. Ehrlichman, United States of America v. John N. Mitchell, United States of America v. Harry R. Haldeman and John D. Ehrlichman, Nos. 75-1381, 75-1382, 75-1384 and 76-1441.united States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Accord, United States v. Greene, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 21, 35 , 489 F.2d 1145, 1159 (1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 977 , 95 S.Ct. 239 , 42 L.Ed.2d 190 (1974); United States v. Fench, 152 U.S.App.D.C. 325 , 331, 470 F.2d 1234, 1240 (1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 909 , 93 S.Ct. 964 , 35 L.Ed.2d 271 (1973); Robinson v. United States, 148 U.S.App.D.C. 58 , 67 & n. 63, 459 F.2d 847 , 856 & n. 63 (1973); United States v. Bobbitt, 146 U.S.App.D.C. 224 , 450 F.2d 685, 688 (1971); Bradley v. United States, 140 U.S.App.D.C. 7, 13 , 433 F.2d 1113, 1119 (1969); Bracey v. United States, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 23 , 25-…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Haldeman
Accord, United States v. Greene, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 21, 35 , 489 F.2d 1145, 1159 (1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 977 , 95 S.Ct. 239 , 42 L.Ed.2d 190 (1974); United States v. Fench, 152 U.S.App.D.C. 325 , 331, 470 F.2d 1234, 1240 (1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 909 , 93 S.Ct. 964 , 35 L.Ed.2d 271 (1973); Robinson v. United States, 148 U.S.App.D.C. 58 , 67 & n. 63, 459 F.2d 847 , 856 & n. 63 (1973); United States v. Bobbitt, 146 U.S.App.D.C. 224 , 450 F.2d 685, 688 (1971); Bradley v. United States, 140 U.S. App.D.C. 7, 13, 433 F.2d 1113, 1119 (1969); Bracey v. United States, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 23 , 25-…
discussed
Cited "see"
Bethea v. United States
See United States v. Greene, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 21 , 489 F.2d 1145 (1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 977 , 95 S.Ct. 239 , 42 L.Ed.2d 190 (1974); see also United States v. Naples, 192 F.Supp. 23, 39 (D.D.C.1961), rev’d on other grounds, 113 U.S.App.D.C. 281 , 307 F.2d 618 (1962).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Barker
See United States v. (La Vance) Greene, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 21 , 489 F.2d 1145, 1174-80 (1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 977 , 95 S.Ct. 239 , 42 L.Ed.2d 190 (1974) (Statement of Bazelon, C.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Beachey L. Wright
See United States v. Thompson, 147 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 452 F.2d 1333 (1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 998 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 467 (1972), discussed in relation to § 301 in United States v. (La Vance) Greene, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 21, 48-49 , 489 F.2d 1145, 1172-73 (1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 977 , 95 S.Ct. 239 , 42 L.Ed.2d 190 (1974) (Statement of Bazelon, C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Todd v. State
Compare the analysis of Chief Judge Bazelon in United States v. Greene, 489 F.2d 1145 (D.C.Cir.1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 977 , 95 S.Ct. 239 , 42 L.Ed.2d 190 (1974): At common law, homicides were divided into two categories, murder and manslaughter, with murder requiring a showing of “malice.” Any homicide committed in the course of a felony was considered murder because malice could be implied from the commission of the felony.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Arruda v. Berman
See also Inmates of Suffolk County Jail v. Einsenstadt, 494 F.2d 1196 (1st Cir. 1974), cert. denied, Hall v. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail, 419 U.S. 977 , 95 S.Ct. 239 , 42 L.Ed.2d 189 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert M. Layne v. Douglas Vinzant, Frank Hall and Charles Gaughan, Robert M. Layne v. Douglas Vinzant
See also Inmates of Suffolk County Jail v. Eisenstadt, 1 Cir., 1974, 494 F.2d 1196, 1199 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 977 , 95 S.Ct. 239 , 42 L.Ed.2d 189 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Santiago v. City of Philadelphia
See, e. g., Inmates of Suffolk County Jail v. Eisenstadt, 494 F.2d 1196, 1199 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 977 , 95 S.Ct. 239 , 42 L.Ed.2d 189 (1974); Dewell v. Lawson, 489 F.2d 877, 881 (10th Cir. 1974); Smith v. Ross, 482 F.2d 33, 36-37 (6th Cir. 1973); Jennings v. Davis, supra at 1275; Wright v. McMann, supra at 134-35; Carter v. Carlson, supra at 365. 6 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Moore v. Janing
See, e. g., Inmates of Suffolk County Jail v. Eisenstadt, 360 F.Supp. 676, 690-91 (D.Mass.1973), aff’d, 494 F.2d 1196 (1st Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 977 , 95 S.Ct. 239 , 42 L.Ed.2d 189 (1974); Inmates of Milwaukee County Jail v. Petersen, 353 F.Supp. 1157, 1169 (E.D.Wis.1973); Brenneman v. Madigan, 343 F.Supp. 128, 141 (N.D.Cal.1972); Jones v. Wittenberg, 330 F.Supp. 707, 719 (N.D.Ohio 1971), aff’d, 456 F.2d 854 (6th Cir. 1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Delaney v. Dias
See, e. g., Inmates of Suffolk County Jail v. Eisenstadt, 494 F.2d 1196, 1199 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 977 , 95 S.Ct. 239 , 42 L.Ed.2d 189 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rizzo v. Goode
(2×)
See also Inmates of Suffolk County Jail v. Eisenstadt, 494 F. 2d 1196, 1199 (CA1), cert. denied, 419 U. S. 977 (1974), and Rozecki v. Gaughan, 459 F. 2d 6, 8 (CA1 1972); Wright v. McMann, 460 F. 2d 126 , 134-135 (CA2), cert. denied, 409 U. S. 885 (1972); Lewis v. Kugler, 446 F. 2d 1343, 1351 (CA3 1971); Lankford v. Gelston, 364 F. 2d 197 (CA4 1966); Jennings v. Patterson, 460 F. 2d 1021, 1022 (CA5 1972); Smith v. Ross, 482 F. 2d 33, 36 (CA6 1973); Byrd v. Brishke, 466 F. 2d 6, 10-11 (CA7 1972); Jennings v. Davis, 476 F. 2d 1271, 1275 (CA8 1973); Dewell v. Lawson, 489 F. 2d 877, 881 (CA10 1974)…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hall, Correction Commissioner
v.
Inmates of the Suffolk County Jail
v.
Inmates of the Suffolk County Jail
No. 73-1992.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 29, 1974.
Cited by 13 opinions | Published
Citer courts: E.D. New York (4) · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial… (3)
C. A. 1st Cir. Motion of respondents Lopez et al. for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.