green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
10.5 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Zachairah Z., a juvenile
the revocation authority . . . does not sit to punish"; "ts concern is whether the law has been obeyed, not whether it has been culpably broken
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Walton v. Mariner Health of Maryland, Inc.
it is a well settled principle of agency law that an agent acting within the scope of his authority for a disclosed principal is not bound on a contract made in the principal's name.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Estate of William L. Reno, Jr. Barbara G. Reno v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
(2×)
the value of the marital deduction and the effect of death taxes upon the extent of the marital deduction are to be determined as a matter of federal law. thus, the orders of state probate courts are not applicable.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Carol Patterson etc. v. United States
Not only was Wycoff a pre-QTIP case that relied on Jackson, the court believed that "[i]n the absence of a clear and unambiguous direction [by the decedent], property transferred to the surviving spouse must bear part of the estate tax burden." Id. at 1149-50.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Fisher
See United States v. Munford, 431 F.Supp. 278, 290 (E.D.Pa.1977), citing United States v. Cook, 505 F.2d 659, 664 (5th Cir.1974), ce rt. denied, 421 U.S. 1000 , 95 S.Ct. 2397 , 44 L.Ed.2d 667 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Untermeyer v. Valhi, Inc.
See American Standard, Inc. v. Crane Co., 510 F.2d 1043 , 1057 n. 22 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1000 , 95 S.Ct. 2397 , 44 L.Ed.2d 667 (1975); Newmark v. RKO General, Inc., 425 F.2d 348 , 352 n. 4 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 854 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 91 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Billy M.
See In re Anderson, 272 Md. 85 , 321 A.2d 516 (1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1000 , 95 S.Ct. 2399 , 44 L.Ed.2d 667 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Dunn v. United States Parole Commission
See Knight v. Estelle, 501 F.2d 963 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1000 , 95 S.Ct. 2399 , 44 L.Ed.2d 668 (1975); Steinberg v. Police Court of Albany, New York, 610 F.2d 449 (6th Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,072 Harry Lewis v. William H. McAdam Sears, Roebuck and Co., and Sears Development Corporation
See American Standard, Inc. v. Crane Co., 510 F.2d 1043, 1062 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1000 , 95 S.Ct. 2397 , 44 L.Ed.2d 667 (1975); Newmark v. RKO General, Inc., 425 F.2d 348 , 352 n. 2 (2d Cir.), cert. de *804 nied, 400 U.S. 854 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 91 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
Whittaker v. Whittaker Corp.
See American Standard, Inc. v. Crane Co., 510 F.2d 1043, 1058 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1000 , 95 S.Ct. 2397 , 44 L.Ed.2d 667 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
ca9 1981
See American Standard, Inc. v. Crane Co., 510 F.2d 1043, 1058 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1000 , 95 S.Ct. 2397 , 44 L.Ed.2d 667 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Plummer v. General Electric Co.
See American Standard Inc. v. Crane Co., 60 F.R.D. 35, 42-43 (S.D.N.Y.), rev’d on other grounds, 510 F.2d 1043 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 421 U.S. 1000 , 95 S.Ct. 2397 , 44 L.Ed.2d 667 (1975); Luth v. Clifton S. S. Corp., 27 F.R.D. 507, 508 (E.D.Pa.1961); Moore, supra, ¶ 39.09 at 39-26 and n.7.
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Wright
Accord, United States v. James, 505 F.2d 898 , 900 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1000 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Singleton
“Where there is, in a § 7201 prosecution, a disputed issue of fact as to the existence of the requisite affirmative commission in addition to the § 7203 omission, a defendant would, of course, be entitled to a lesser-included offense charge based on § 7203.” Sansone v. United States, 380 U.S. 343, 351 , 85 S.Ct. 1004, 1010 , 13 L.Ed.2d 882 (1965) (dictum); accord, United States v. Cook, 505 F.2d 659, 665 (5th Cir. 1974), cert, denied, 421 U.S. 1000 , 95 S.Ct. 2397 , 44 L.Ed.2d 667 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Davis
See United States v. James, 505 F.2d 898 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1000 , 95 S.Ct. 2397 , 44 L.Ed.2d 667 (1975); United States v. Mackin, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 427 , 502 F.2d 429 (1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1052 , 95 S.Ct. 629 , 42 L.Ed.2d 647 (1974); United States v. Rispo, 460 F.2d 965 (3d Cir. 1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ruskay v. Levin
See, for an interesting discussion of the effect of tender offers on market activity, American Standard, Inc. v. Crane Co., 346 F.Supp. 1153, 1160 (S.D.N.Y.1972), rev’d on other grounds, 510 F.2d 1043 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1000 , 95 S.Ct. 2397 , 44 L.Ed.2d 667 (1975). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lopez-Sanchez v. State
(2×)
See also Matter of Anderson, 272 Md. 85, 91-92 , 321 A.2d 516, 519-20 (1974) (State permitted to appeal juvenile proceeding before enactment of statute making State party to juvenile causes), appeal dismissed, Epps v. Maryland, 419 U.S. 809 , 95 S.Ct. 21 , 42 L.Ed.2d 35 (1974), cert. denied, Anderson v. Maryland, 421 U.S. 1000 , 95 S.Ct. 2399 , 44 L.Ed.2d 667 (1975); Karr v. Shirk, 142 Md. 118, 121 , 120 A. 248, 249 (1923) (recognizing that non-parties with direct interest may be entitled to appeal but finding appellant law firm to hold no such interest); Preston v. Poe, 116 Md. 1, 6 , 81 A. 1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Theodore Lawrence Brown
For example, while a criminal conviction requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, revocation requires only proof to satisfy the court “that the probationer has abused the opportunity granted him not to be incarcerated.” Roberson v. Connecticut, 501 F.2d 305, 308 (2d Cir.1974); United States v. Nagelberg, 413 F.2d 708, 709 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1010 , 90 S.Ct. 569 , 24 L.Ed.2d 502 (1970); see also Knight v. Estelle, 501 F.2d 963 , 964 n. 3 (5th Cir.1974) (adopting preponderance of the evidence standard for revocation proceedings), cer t. denied, 421 U.S. 1000 , 95 S.Ct. 239…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ferrone v. Soffes
In Re Barret's Estate, 137 So.2d 587, 593 (Fla. 1st DCA 1962); see also Estate of Wycoff v. Commissioner, 506 F.2d 1144 (10th Cir.1974), cert. denied sub nom Zions First Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 421 U.S. 1000 , 95 S.Ct. 2398 , 44 L.Ed.2d 667 (1975); Succession of Mayer, 229 La. 259 , 87 So.2d 303 (1956); Loring v. Gardner, 221 Mass. 571 , 109 N.E. 635 (1915).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harry Kay v. Scientex Corporation
See, e.g., American Standard, Inc. v. Crane Co., 510 F.2d 1043, 1054-56 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1000 , 95 S.Ct. 2397 , 44 L.Ed.2d 667 (1975) (stock exchange after merger not a sale when insider did not direct or anticipate profitable exchange); Sprague Elec.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kay v. Scientex Corp.
See, e.g., American Standard, Inc. v. Crane Co., 510 F.2d 1043, 1054-56 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1000 , 95 S.Ct. 2397 , 44 L.Ed.2d 667 (1975) (stock exchange after merger not a sale when insider did not direct or anticipate profitable exchange); Sprague Elec.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matas v. Siess
Newmark v. RKO General, 425 F.2d 348, 351 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 854 , 91 S.Ct. 64 , 27 L.Ed.2d 91 , U.S. reh. den., 400 U.S. 920 , 91 S.Ct. 172 , 27 L.Ed.2d 161 (1970); see also American Standard, Inc. v. Crane Co., 510 F.2d 1043 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 421 U.S. 1000 , 95 S.Ct. 2397 , 44 L.Ed.2d 667 (1974). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Anthony Sisto
See also United States v. James, 5 Cir. 1975, 505 F.2d 898 , cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1000 , 95 S.Ct. 2397 , 44 L.Ed.2d 667 ; United States v. Clark, 5 Cir. 1973, 480 F.2d 1249 , cert. denied, 414 U.S. 978 , 94 S.Ct. 301 , 38 L.Ed.2d 222 .
American Standard, Inc.
v.
Crane Co.
v.
Crane Co.
No. 74-1189.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.
Jun 2, 1975.
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.