green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
11.0 score
“because of their contemporaneous enactment, interpretations of provisions of one act have frequently been applied to the comparable provision of the other”
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 46 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
City of New York v. ANGLEBROOK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
because of their contemporaneous enactment, interpretations of provisions of one act have frequently been applied to the comparable provision of the other
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Gloria Price v. United States Navy Harry Moses Marguerite Moses (Deceased) Michael Moses Shirley Moses
ase law and dictionary definition agree that endanger means something less than actual harm
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ernest Dague, Sr., Ernest Dague, Jr., Betty Dague, and Rose A. Bessette v. City of Burlington
ase law and dictionary definition agree that endanger means something less than actual harm
cited
Cited "see"
Alsea Valley Alliance v. Evans
See Ethyl Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency, 541 F.2d 1, 34 (D.C.Cir.), cert. den., 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Goodrich v. Betkoski
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 25 & n. 52 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 2663, 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Goodrich v. Betkoski
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 25 & n. 52 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 2663, 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976). 92 Although we find Dr. Brown's affidavit highly probative, it is not dispositive of the issues at bar.
discussed
Cited "see"
National Mining Ass'n v. U.S. Department of the Interior
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 48 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 2663, 89 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976) (notice need not contain “every precise proposal which [the agency] may ultimately adopt as a rule”); Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Nuclear Regulatory Comm’n, 673 F.2d 525, 533 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 835 , 103 S.Ct. 79 , 74 L.Ed.2d 76 (1982) (agency need not republish for notice and comment rules that follow logically from, or that reasonably develop, the rule as originally proposed). 3.
cited
Cited "see"
United States Environmental Protection Agency v. Sequa Corp.
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 28 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
ca5 1993
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 28 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
American Legion v. Derwinski
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 37 (D.C.Cir.) (en bane), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Center for Auto Safety v. The Federal Highway Administration
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 27 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Gayle W. Binion
(2×)
See Sun Refining & Marketing Co. v. Brennan, 921 F.2d 635, 638 (6th Cir.1990) (citing Bannert v. American Can Co., 525 F.2d 104, 111 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 942 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976) (objections not raised in the district court cannot be raised on appeal)).
discussed
Cited "see"
American Horse Protection Ass'n v. Yeutter
See Ethyl Corp. v. Envi- ronmental Protection Agency, 541 F.2d 1 , 37 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976) (observing that records frequently contain evidence that can be isolated to support “virtually any inference that one might care to draw”).
discussed
Cited "see"
American Horse Protection Association, Inc. v. Clayton Yeutter
See Ethyl Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency, 541 F.2d 1, 37 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976) (observing that records frequently contain evidence that can be isolated to support "virtually any inference that one might care to draw").
discussed
Cited "see"
Frank M. Berlin v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company
(2×)
See Bannert v. American Can Company, 525 F.2d 104, 111 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 942 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Berlin v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.
(2×)
See Bannert v. American Can Company, 525 F.2d 104, 111 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 942 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Hunter v. SMS, Inc.
See Bannert v. American Can Co., 525 F.2d 104 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 942 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
American Mining Congress v. Lee M. Thomas
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 36 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976). 63 * The industry petitioners criticize the EPA's change in and justification for: its radon emission standard (allegedly from a risk of lung cancer to a risk of misuse); its linear-nonthreshold calculations of radon risk; and its projected life-savings from the promulgation of the regulations.
cited
Cited "see"
American Mining Congress v. Thomas
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 36 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
cadc 1985
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 12 & n. 16 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976); Nader v. Schlesinger, 609 F.2d 494 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Sierra Club v. United States Department of Transportation
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 12 & n. 16 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976); Nader v. Schlesinger, 609 F.2d 494 (Temp.Emer.
cited
Cited "see"
Martin Oil Service, Inc. v. Koch Refining Co.
See Texaco, Inc. v. Federal *1066 Energy Administration, 531 F.2d 1071, 1076 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Wildlife Federation v. Marsh
See Grazing Fields, 626 F.2d at 1072 & n. 2. 35 For there to be a “clear error of judgment,” there must be an “error ... so clear as to deprive the agency’s decision of a rational basis.” Almay, Inc. v. Califano, 569 F.2d 674, 680 (D.C.Cir.1977), quoting Ethyl Gorp. v. Environmental Protection Agency, 541 F.2d 1, 35 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
cadc 1982
Accord, Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976) (holding that agency may promulgate rules based on qualitative appraisal of risk when scientific knowledge provides no answer to crucial issues of fact). 60 The original S-3 rulemaking record on waste management and reprocessing consisted solely of a twenty-page statement by the Director of the AEC's Division of Waste Management professing confidence that long-term waste disposal would someday be achieved.
discussed
Cited "see"
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Accord, Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976) (holding that agency may promulgate rules based on qualitative appraisal of risk when scientific knowledge provides no answer to crucial issues of fact). .The original S-3 rulemaking record on waste management and reprocessing consisted solely of a twenty-page statement by the Director of the AEC’s Division of Waste Management professing confidence that long-term waste disposal would someday be achieved.
cited
Cited "see"
Bonnaffons v. United States Department of Energy
See Texaco, Inc. v. Federal Energy Administration, 398 F.Supp. 865, 877 (D.D.C.1975), affirmed, 531 F.2d 1071, 1077 (Em.App.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976). .
discussed
Cited "see"
J. J. Curran v. Merrill Lynch
(2×)
See Bannert v. American Can Co., 525 F.2d 104 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 942 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1975); Schneider v. Electric Auto-Lite Co., 456 F.2d 366, 375 (6th Cir. 1972); Cashner v. United States Steel Corp., 327 F.2d 533 (6th Cir. 1964) (court refused to consider issue not raised until a supplemental appellate brief was filed).
discussed
Cited "see"
Curran v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
(2×)
See Bannert v. American Can Co., 525 F.2d 104 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 942 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1975); Schneider v. Electric Auto-Lite Co., 456 F.2d 366, 375 (6th Cir. 1972); Cashner v. United States Steel Corp., 327 F.2d 533 (6th Cir. 1964) (court refused to consider issue not raised until a supplemental appellate brief was filed).
cited
Cited "see"
National Association of Demolition Contractors, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency
See Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 176 U.S.App.D.C. 373 , 541 F.2d 1 (en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Action For Children's Television v. Federal Communications Commission
See Texaco, Inc. v. FEA, 531 F.2d 1071, 1081-82 (Em.App.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976). 57 The Commission's treatment of the various issues and its extended explanation for the action taken detailed in the Report show that ACT's participation in these proceedings was not just pro forma, and that its submissions were not simply ignored.
cited
Cited "see"
Action for Children's Television v. Federal Communications Commission
See Texaco, Inc. v. FEA, 531 F.2d 1071, 1081-82 (Em.App.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sinclair
See Government of the Virgin Islands v. Navarro, 513 F.2d 11, 19 (3d Cir.), cert. denied 422 U.S. 1045 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 45 L.Ed.2d 698 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gavrilovic
See Texaco, Inc. v. FEA, 531 F.2d 1071 (Em.App.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976); Nader v. Sawhiil, 514 F.2d 1064 (Em.App.1975); Reeves v. Simon, 507 F.2d 455 (Em.App.1974), cert, denied, 420 U.S. 991 , 95 S.Ct. 1426 , 43 L.Ed.2d 672 (1975); California v. Simon, 504 F.2d 430 (Em.App.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1021 , 95 S.Ct. 496 , 42 L.Ed.2d 294 (1974); DeRieux v. Five Smiths, Inc., 499 F.2d 1321 (Em.App.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 896 , 95 S.Ct. 176 , 42 L.Ed.2d 141 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca8 1977
See Texaco, Inc. v. FEA, 531 F.2d 1071 (Em.App.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976); Nader v. Sawhill, 514 F.2d 1064 (Em.App.1975); Reeves v. Simon, 507 F.2d 455 (Em.App.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 991 , 95 S.Ct. 1426 , 43 L.Ed.2d 672 (1975); California v. Simon, 504 F.2d 430 (Em.App.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1021 , 95 S.Ct. 496 , 42 L.Ed.2d 294 (1974); DeRieux v. Five Smiths, Inc., 499 F.2d 1321 (Em.App.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 896 , 95 S.Ct. 176 , 42 L.Ed.2d 141 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Flue-Cured Tobacco Cooperative Stabilization Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
See, e.g., Ethyl Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency, 541 F.2d 1, 35-37 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rust Construction Co. v. Martin
Sutton v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 885 F.2d 471 (8th Cir.1989); see also, Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. den., 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Justin A. Dimacchia v. James F. Burke, Jr., Blakemore, Rosen, Meeker & Varian Co., L.P.A.
See, e.g., Bannert v. American Can Company, 525 F.2d 104, 111 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 942 (1976). 3 4 There was no evidence that Burke's handling of this matter fell below the level of competent service.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Marder v. G.D. Searle & Co.
See, e.g., Ethyl Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency, 541 F.2d 1 , 26 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
James D. Fisher v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See, e.g., Bannert v. American Can Co., 525 F.2d 104 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 942 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re White Motor Corporation
(2×)
See, e.g., Bannert v. American Can Co., 525 F.2d 104, 111 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 942 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. White Motor Corp.
(2×)
See, e.g., Bannert v. American Can Co., 525 F.2d 104, 111 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 942 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United Transportation Union v. Drew Lewis, Secretary of Transportation
See also Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 , 34 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sierra Club v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, National Coal Association, Alabama Power Company, Intervenors
See, e. g„ Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1, 48-53 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976) (in addition to extending the comment period, EPA also admitted studies and comments after the extended period had closed).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Industrial Sand Ass'n v. Marshall
Compare Texaco, Inc. v. Federal Energy Administration, 531 F.2d 1071, 1077 (T.E.C.A.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976), with United States v. Nova Scotia Food Products Corp., 568 F.2d 240, 251 (2d Cir. 1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca3 1979
Compare Texaco, Inc. v. Federal Energy Administration, 531 F.2d 1071, 1077 (T.E.C.A.), Cert. denied, 426 U.S. 941 , 96 S.Ct. 2662 , 49 L.Ed.2d 394 (1976), With United States v. Nova Scotia Food Products Corp., 568 F.2d 240, 251 (2d Cir. 1977).
Bannert
v.
American Can Co.
v.
American Can Co.
No. 75-1480.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 14, 1976.
Cited by 11 opinions | Published
C. A. Oth Cir. Motion for leave to file an amended petition for writ of certiorari granted. Certiorari denied.