green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. Town of Carroll
It is well established that “a municipality has the authority, pursuant to its police powers, to impose conditions of operation . . . upon preexisting nonconforming uses to protect public safety and welfare” (id.) and “may even eliminate [a] nonconforming use provided that termination is accomplished in a reasonable fashion” (Syracuse Aggregate Corp., 51 NY2d at 287 ; see Town Bd. of Town of Southampton v 1320 Entertainment, 236 AD2d 387, 388 [1997]; Moran v Village of Philmont, 147 AD2d 230, 233-235 [1989], appeal dismissed 74 NY2d 943 [1989]; Dutchess Sanitation, 56 AD2d at 152 ; see…
discussed
Cited "see"
JONES, CAROL L. v. TOWN OF CARROLL
It is well established that “a municipality has the authority, pursuant to its police powers, to impose conditions of operation . . . upon preexisting nonconforming uses to protect public safety and welfare” (id.) and “may even eliminate [a] nonconforming use provided that termination is accomplished in a reasonable fashion” (Syracuse Aggregate Corp., 51 NY2d at 287 ; see Town Bd. of Town of Southampton v 1320 Entertainment, 236 AD2d 387, 388 ; Moran v Village of Philmont, 147 AD2d 230, 233-235 , appeal dismissed 74 NY2d 943 ; Dutchess Sanitation, 56 AD2d at 152 ; see generally Modjesk…
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. Town of Carroll
It is well established that “a municipality has the authority, pursuant to its police powers, to impose conditions of operation . . . upon preexisting nonconforming uses to protect public safety and welfare” (id.) and “may even eliminate [a] nonconforming use provided that termination is accomplished in a reasonable fashion” (Syracuse Aggregate Corp., 51 NY2d at 287 ; see Town Bd. of Town of Southampton v 1320 Entertainment, 236 AD2d 387, 388 [1997]; Moran v Village of Philmont, 147 AD2d 230, 233-235 [1989], appeal dismissed 74 NY2d 943 [1989]; Dutchess Sanitation, 56 AD2d at 152 ; see…
discussed
Cited "see"
Town of Islip v. Caviglia
Co. v Town of Southampton, 60 NY2d 70 , rearg denied 61 NY2d 670 ; see, Modjeska Sign Studios v Berle, 43 NY2d 468 , rearg denied 43 NY2d 951 , appeal dismissed 439 US 809 ; Matter of Harbison v City of Buffalo, 4 NY2d 553 , supra; see also, Annotation, Nonconforming Uses-Amortization, 22 ALR3d 1134).
discussed
Cited "see"
Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Durham
Waynesville, 833 F.2d at 46; accord Modjeska Sign Studios, Inc. v. Berle, 43 N.Y.2d 468 , 402 N.Y.S.2d 359 , 373 N.E.2d 255 (1977), appeal dismissed, 439 U.S. 809 , 99 S.Ct. 66 , 58 L.Ed.2d 101 (1978); Suffolk Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Hulse, 43 N.Y.2d 483 , 402 N.Y.S.2d 368 , 373 N.E.2d 263 (1977), appeal dismissed, 439 U.S. 808 , 99 S.Ct. 66 , 58 L.Ed.2d 101 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City Of Durham
Waynesville, 833 F.2d at 46; accord Modjeska Sign Studios, Inc. v. Berle, 43 N.Y.2d 468 , 402 N.Y.S.2d 359 , 373 N.E.2d 255 (1977), appeal dismissed, 439 U.S. 809 , 99 S.Ct. 66 , 58 L.Ed.2d 101 (1978); Suffolk Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Hulse, 43 N.Y.2d 483 , 402 N.Y.S.2d 368 , 373 N.E.2d 263 (1977), appeal dismissed, 439 U.S. 808 , 99 S.Ct. 66 , 58 L.Ed.2d 101 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Advertising Co. v. Department of Highways
See, e.g., VFW, Post 4264 v. City of Steamboat Springs, 195 Colo. 44 , 50, 575 P.2d 835 , 840, appeal dismissed, 439 U.S. 809 , 99 S.Ct. 66 , 58 L.Ed.2d 101 (1978); City of Greeley v. Ells, 186 Colo. 352, 358 , 527 P.2d 538, 541 (1974); Service Oil Co. v. Rhodus, 179 Colo. 335, 344 , 500 P.2d 807, 811 (1972); Roosevelt v. City of Englewood, 176 Colo. 576, 586 , 492 P.2d 65, 70 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wigginess Inc. v. Fruchtman
See also Modjeska Sign Studios, Inc. v. Berle, 43 N.Y.2d 468, 479 , 402 N.Y.S.2d 359, 366 , 373 N.E.2d 255, 261 (1977), ‘dismissed for want of substantial federal question, 439 U.S. 809 , 99 S.Ct. 66 , 58 L.Ed.2d 101 (1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jenkins
v.
District of Columbia
v.
District of Columbia
No. 78-5185.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1978.
Published
Appeal from C. A. D. C. Cir. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.