green
Positive treatment
6.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Ruth Miller v. Central Dispatch, Inc. And Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
(2×)
Pfeiffer Co. v. Ford, 444 U.S. at 78-81, 100 S.Ct. at 335-36 , 62 L.Ed.2d at 233-35.
discussed
Cited "see"
Keen v. Weaver
See Boggs v. Boggs, 520 U.S. 833, 850 , 117 S.Ct. 1754 , 138 L.Ed.2d 45 (1997) (reviewing cases including In re Marriage of Campa, 89 Cal.App.3d 113 , 152 Cal.Rptr. 362 (1979), dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 444 U.S. 1028 , 100 S.Ct. 696 , 62 L.Ed.2d 664 (1980), and concluding that: "[w]hether or not this [pre-REA federal common-law] extension of the definition of 'beneficiary' was consistent with the statute then in force, these authorities are not applicable in light of the REA amendments.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pannell v. American Home Products Corp.
See Fusco v. Perini North River Associates, 601 F.2d 659, 664 (2nd Cir.1979), vacated on other grounds, 444 U.S. 1028 , 100 S.Ct. 697 , 62 L.Ed.2d 664 (1980) (presumption legislature intends to adopt old phrase and judicial construction of phrase).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Panell
See Fusco v. Perini North River Associates, 601 F.2d 659, 664 (2d Cir.1979), vacated on other grounds, 444 U.S. 1028 , 100 S.Ct. 697 , 62 L.Ed.2d 664 (1980): "[W]hen a legislature borrows an already judicially interpreted phrase from an old statute to use it in a new statute, it is presumed that the legislature intends to adopt not merely the old phrase but the judicial construction of that phrase." See, also, Burnet v. Harmel, 287 U.S. 103, 108 , 53 S.Ct. 74 , 77 L.Ed. 199 (1932); Long v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, 767 F.2d 1578, 1581 (9th Cir.1985); Harper v. Souther…
discussed
Cited "see"
Powell v. Commissioner
(2×)
See In re Marriage of Campa , 444 U.S. 1028 (1980) .
discussed
Cited "see"
Messerschmidt v. United States
See In re Bergy, 596 F.2d 952, 960 (C.C.P.A.1979) (Rich, J.) (describing the three doors “which must be opened on the difficult path to patentability”), vacated on other grounds, Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 444 U.S. 1028 , 100 S.Ct. 700 , 62 L.Ed.2d 666 (1980). 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
Eichelberger v. Eichelberger
See In re Marriage of Campa, 89 Cal. App.3d 113 , 152 Cal.Rptr. 362 (1979), appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 2 444 U.S. 1028 , 100 S.Ct. *901 696, 62 L.Ed.2d 664 (1980); Carpenters Pension Trust for Southern California v. Kronschnabel, 632 F.2d 745 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S.Ct. 3159 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1981) (trustees of ERISA regulated pension plan may be required by state law to pay some portion of a pension directly to a participant’s ex-spouse); Stone v. Stone, 632 F.2d 740 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied 453 U.S. 922 , 101 S.Ct. 3158 , 69 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Perini North River Associates
(2×)
See Fusco v. Perini North River Associates, 601 F. 2d 659 (CA2 1979), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 444 U. S. 1028 , adhered to on remand, 622 F. 2d 1111 (CA2 1980), cert. denied, 449 U. S. 1131 (1981); Director, OWCP v. Donzi Marine, Inc., 586 F. 2d 377 (CA5 1978); and I.
discussed
Cited "see"
Keith A. Boudreaux v. American Workover, Inc., Awi, Inc., Defendant-Third-Party v. American Insurance Co., Third-Party
(2×)
See Fusco v. Perini North River Associates, 601 F.2d 659 (2d Cir. 1979), vacated and remanded, 444 U.S. 1028 , 100 S.Ct. 697 , 62 L.Ed.2d 664 (1980), rev’d on remand, 622 F.2d 1111 (2d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1131 , 101 S.Ct. 953 , 67 L.Ed.2d 119 (1981) (worker injured over navigable waters while engaged in constructing sewage disposal project ex tending over water not engaged in “maritime employment” and thus not covered by LHWCA); Thibodaux v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 580 F.2d 841 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 2820 , 61 L.Ed.2d 274 (1979) (worker who …
cited
Cited "see"
Ohm v. Ohm
See, In Re Marriage of Campa, 89 Cal. App. 3d 113 , 152 Cal. Rptr. 362 (1979), appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 1028 , 100 S. Ct. 696 , 62 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Raymond Churchill v. Perini North River Associates
See Fusco v. Perini North River Associates, 601 F.2d 659, 661 (2d Cir. 1979), vacated and remanded, 444 U.S. 1028 , 100 S.Ct. 697 , 62 L.Ed.2d 664 (1980) 3 Churchill's case was decided with five other consolidated cases, all arising out of the North River Pollution Control Project
cited
Cited "see"
Churchill v. Perini North River Associates
See Fusco v. Perini North River Associates, 601 F.2d 659, 661 (2d Cir. 1979), vacated and remanded, 444 U.S. 1028 , 100 S.Ct. 697 , 62 L.Ed.2d 664 (1980). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Trimble
v.
Conley, Judge
v.
Conley, Judge
No. A-600 (79-5919).
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 11, 1980.
444 U.S. 1028
Published
Sup. Ct. Mo. Application for stay, addressed to The Chief Justice, and by him referred to the Court, denied.