green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Mata
(2×)
See 126 Ariz. 19, 26-27 , 612 P.2d 475, 482-83 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 287 , 66 L.Ed.2d 141 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Williams v. State
See Antone v. State, 382 So.2d 1205 (Fla.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 287 , 66 L.Ed.2d 141 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alvarado v. State
See Antone v. State, 382 So.2d 1205, 1213 (Fla.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 287 , 66 L.Ed.2d 141 (1980); Stanley v. State, 93 Fla. 372 , 112 So. 73, 74 (1927); Nelson v. State, 32 Fla. 244 , 13 So. 361 , 362 (1893).
cited
Cited "see"
Wallace v. Town of Palm Beach
See, Service Machine & Shipbuilding Corp. v. Edwards, 466 F.Supp. 1200, 1205 (W.D.La.1979), rev’d, 617 F.2d 70 (5th Cir. 1980), aff'd, 449 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 310 , 66 L.Ed.2d 142 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Connell
See Antone v. State, 382 So.2d 1205 (Fla. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 287 , 66 L.Ed.2d 141 (1980); Salvatore v. State, 366 So.2d 745 (Fla. 1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 885 , 100 S.Ct. 177 , 62 L.Ed.2d 115 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Rice v. State
See Antone v. State, 382 So.2d 1205 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 287 , 66 L.Ed.2d 141 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
White v. State
See Antone v. State, 382 So.2d 1205, 1212-13 (Fla.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 287 , 66 L.Ed.2d 141 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Bottoson v. State
See Antone v. State, 382 So.2d 1205 (Fla.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 287 , 66 L.Ed.2d 141 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. State
See Service Mach. & Shipbuilding Corp. v. Edwards, 617 F.2d 70, 76 (5th Cir.), aff’d mem., 449 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 310 , 66 L.Ed.2d 142 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Vickers
After reviewing the record and making an independent determination of the aggravating and mitigating circumstances, and weighing them against each other, we do not find the mitigating circumstances “sufficiently substantial to call for leniency.” Former A.R.S-. § 13-703(E); see State v. Steelman, 126 Ariz. 19 , 612 P.2d 475 , cert. denied 449 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 287 , 66 L.Ed.2d 141 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Williams
(2×)
"Convictions entered prior to a sentencing hearing may thus be considered regardless of the order in which the underlying crimes occurred or the order in which the convictions were entered." Gretzler, 135 Ariz. at 57 n. 2, 659 P.2d at 16 n. 2 (citations omitted); see also State v. Steelman, 126 Ariz. 19, 25 , 612 P.2d 475, 481 (holding that murders committed after the charged murder can support a section 13-703(F)(2) finding), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 287 , 66 L.Ed.2d 141 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Riley v. State
See e.g., Antone v. State, 382 So.2d 1205 , 1211— 12 (Fla.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 287 , 66 L.Ed.2d 141 (1980); Findlay v. State, 316 So.2d 33 (Fla.1975); Mathes v. State, 375 So.2d 1084 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Combs v. State
See also Antone v. State, 382 So.2d 1205 (Fla.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 287 , 66 L.Ed.2d 141 (1980), in which this Court remanded for testimony on an application for new trial based upon a relationship, between the state and a key trial witness, that was unknown to either side until the appeal was pending. [1] 450 U.S. at 29 , 101 S.Ct. at 964. [2] At 665. [3] I must confess that it is beyond my powers of comprehension to understand how the majority can seriously contend that the addition of subsection (i) as an aggravating circumstance "inure[s] to the benefit of a defendant."
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Finney
v.
Balkcom, Warden Steelman v. Arizona Antone v. Florida
v.
Balkcom, Warden Steelman v. Arizona Antone v. Florida
No. 80-5235; No. 80-5252; No. 80-5268.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1980.
Brennan, Marshall.
Cited by 58 opinions | Published
Lead Opinion
Super. Ct. Ga., Tattnall County;
Sup. Ct. Ariz.; and
Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 80-5252, 120 Ariz. 301, 585 P. 2d 1213; No. 80-5268, 382 So. 2d 1205.
Dissent
Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,
dissenting.
Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.