green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "but see"
U.S. Dominator, Inc. v. Factory Ship Robert E. Resoff
But see United States v. Renfro, 620 F.2d 497, 500 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 321 , 66 L.Ed.2d 149 (1980).
cited
Cited "but see"
U.S. Dominator, Inc. v. Factory Ship Robert E. Resoff
But see United States v. Renfro, 620 F.2d 497, 500 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 321 , 66 L.Ed.2d 149 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bertoli
See United States v. Renfro, 620 F.2d 497, 500-01 (5th Cir.) (evidence of FBI agent’s bias properly excluded under Rule 403 where basis of relevance was allegation that agent had offered immunity to witnesses in exchange for testimony), ce rt. denied, 449 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 321 , 66 L.Ed.2d 149 (1980); United States v. Johnson, 605 F.2d 1025, 1030 (7th Cir.1979) (evidence indicating “indictment was a political instrument” properly excluded under Rule 403 because admission would have “permitted excursions into extraneous and collateral matters”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1033 , 100 S.…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Gerlaugh
See the discussion of State v. (Alonzo) Mata, 125 Ariz. 243 , 609 P.2d 58 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 322 , 66 L.Ed.2d 150 (1980), in State v. Gillies, supra, 135 Ariz. at 516, 662 P.2d at 1023 , which contains information not found in the original opinion (defendant was an immature 18-year-old with no prior criminal record who did not commit the actual murder but was only an accomplice to the murder).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hively
(2×)
See United States v. Renfro, 620 F.2d 497, 500-501 (5th Cir. 1980), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 321 , 66 L.Ed.2d 149 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James McCollom
See United States v. Renfro, 620 F.2d 497 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 321 , 66 L.Ed.2d 149 (1981); United States v. Bright, 588 F.2d 504 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 972 , 99 S.Ct. 1537 , 59 L.Ed.2d 789 (1979); United States v. Wells, 525 F.2d 974 (5th Cir. 1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Orantez
Romley v. Superior Court, 172 Ariz. 232, 236 , 836 P.2d 445, 449 (App.1992) (“[I]f a trial court excludes essential evidence, thereby precluding a defendant from presenting a theory of defense, the trial court’s decision results in a denial of defendant’s right to due process that is not harmless.”); see also State v. Mata, 125 Ariz. 243, 244 , 609 P.2d 58, 59 (upholding trial court’s rejection of proffered testimony of victim’s statement that she had previously prostituted herself with murder defendant for heroin in part because statement was made while victim was high on heroin a…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jerry Junior Willis
Evidence which refutes may deny, explain, "or otherwise shed[ ] light on evidence offered by an opponent as to a fact of consequence in the litigation including the credibility of witnesses." Id.; see also, United States v. Renfro, 620 F.2d 497 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 921 (1980) (the government's witness reenacted the crime.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Joly
See State v. Wade, 96 Conn. 238, 247-48 , 113 A. 458 (1921); see also United States v. Renfro, 620 F.2d 497, 501 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 921 , 101 S. Ct. 321 , 66 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Forster v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
See also Gryc v. Dayton-Hudson Corp., 297 N.W.2d 727 (Minn.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 320 , 66 L.Ed.2d 149 (1980) (where this court observed that the Flammable Fabrics Act had been amended to expressly confirm that a *660 pajama manufacturer’s compliance with federal consumer safety rules did not relieve the manufacturer of liability at common law or under state statute).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Estate of Hartz v. Nelson
See, e.g., Gryc v. Dayton-Hudson Corp., 297 N.W.2d 727 (Minn.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 320 , 66 L.Ed.2d 149 (1980). 7 Appellant’s conduct in this case is not like a manufacturer that continues to produce and distribute defective products after discovering their harmful effects.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mulhern v. Outboard Marine Corp.
(2×)
See also Gryc v. Dayton-Hudson Corp., 297 N.W.2d 727, 737 (Minn. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 921 (1980) (The Consumer Products Safety Act, 15 U.S.C. sec. 2051 , had a similar provision which did not exclude private remedies).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Forster v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
See, e.g., Gryc v. Dayton-Hudson Corp., 297 N.W.2d 727 (Minn.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 320 , 66 L.Ed.2d 149 (assessment of punitive damages notwithstanding a preemption provision in the Flammable Fabrics Act); Pikop v. Burlington Northern R.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ellsworth v. Sherne Lingerie, Inc.
(2×)
See also Gryc v. Dayton-Hudson Corp., 297 N.W.2d 727 (Minn.1980), ce rt. denied, 449 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 320 , 66 L.Ed.2d 149 (1980) (affirming an award for punitive damages despite evidence of compliance with the Flammable Fabrics Act). 17 The reports are material to the issues and tend to establish the proposition that the nightgown as sold was unreasonably dangerous to prospective users, and therefore the reports should not have been excluded on grounds of relevance.
T. F. H. Publications, Inc.
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 80-272.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 20, 1980.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.