green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Woodson v. United States
See In re C.P., 411 A.2d 643 , 649 n. 2 (D.C.) (Ferren, J., dissenting), vacated, 449 U.S. 945 , 101 S.Ct. 345 , 66 L.Ed.2d 210 (1980) (discussing interrelationship between Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights).
discussed
Cited "see"
Moore v. United States
See In re C.P., 411 A.2d 643, 646 (D.C.), vacated, 449 U.S. 945 , 101 S.Ct. 345 , 66 L.Ed.2d 210 (1980), on remand, 439 A.2d 460 (D.C.1981). 4 *408 Officer Gurley testified at the suppression hearing that he did not warn appellant of his rights before questioning him.
discussed
Cited "see"
McClinnahan v. United States
(2×)
See generally In re C.P., D.C.App., 411 A.2d 643, 649 (Ferren, J., dissenting), vacated, 449 U.S. 945 , 101 S.Ct. 345 , 66 L.Ed.2d 210 (1980), remanded, 439 A.2d 460 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
California
v.
Level
v.
Level
No. 79-1886.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 3, 1980.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded to the Court of Appeal to consider whether its judgment is based upon federal or state constitutional grounds, or both. See California v. Krivda, 409 U. S. 33 (1972).