green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael K. Hebeka
See United States v. Blecker, 657 F.2d 629, 633-34 (4th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1016 , 71 L.Ed.2d 304 (1982); United States v. Catena, 500 F.2d 1319, 1322-23 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1047 , 95 S.Ct. 621 , 42 L.Ed.2d 641 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Melton
(2×)
See United States v. Lawson, 653 F.2d 299 , 302 n. 7 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1017 , 71 L.Ed.2d 305 (1982) and discussion at pages 907-908, infra. .In his original brief before the division, Melton argued conditionally that if the court fails to determine whether the information used by the psychiatrists possessed adequate indicia of reliability, then the limiting instruction is being asked to carry more weight than it was designed to hold.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Yates
See State v. Guiden, 399 So.2d 194 (La.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1017 , 71 L.Ed.2d 305 (1982); State v. McClain, 415 So.2d 936 (La.1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Allen Peteet, Ann I. Greenhill, Individually and on Behalf of the Heirs of the Estate of James Edward Greenhill, Deceased v. Dow Chemical Company
See United States v. Lawson, 653 F.2d 299 , 302 n. 7 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1017 , 71 L.Ed.2d 305 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Liotard, Russell
Levine, 658 F.2d at 126 (emphasis added); accord, United States v. Litman, 661 F.2d 17 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1016 , 71 L.Ed.2d 304 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnny Edward Ford
See United States v. Blecker, 657 F.2d 629, 633 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1150 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Andrew Greschner, Ronnie Joe Criswell
See Marshall v. United States, 423 F.2d 1315, 1318 (10th Cir.1970) (Government attorney’s participation at hearing violates § 3006A(e)’s ex parte requirement); accord United States v. Lawson, 653 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir.1981) (dictum) (same) cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1017 , 71 L.Ed.2d 305 (1982); Mason v. State of Arizona, 504 F.2d 1345, 1352 (9th Cir.1974) (dictum) (Government attorney’s presence at hearing violates § 3006A(e)), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 936 , 95 S.Ct. 1145 , 43 L.Ed.2d 412 (1975); United States v. Chavis, 476 F.2d 1137, 1145 (D.C.Cir.1973) (same); United St…
cited
Cited "see"
Atlantic Richfield Co. v. United States
See United States v. Siemens America, Inc., 68 CCPA 62, 653 F.2d 471 (1981), cert. denied 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1016 , 71 L.Ed.2d 304 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Matter Impounded
See United States v. Litman, 661 F.2d 17, 19 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1016 , 71 L.Ed.2d 304 (1982), in which we characterized Johanson as “suggesting [that the] denial of [a] pretrial evidentiary hearing on prosecutorial misconduct is nonappealable because post-conviction relief may remedy [a] putative denial of right to [an] impartial grand jury, but holding that the pretrial order did not conclusively determine the issue.” Johanson is but one example of what in Akerly v. Red Barn Systems, Inc., 551 F.2d 539, 543 (3d Cir.1977), we referred to as this Circuit�…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barnes v. District of Columbia
See, e.g., United States v. Lawson, 653 F.2d 299, 303 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1017 , 71 L.Ed.2d 305 (1982) (concluding that lay opinion testimony by FBI agents as to defendant’s sanity was properly admitted despite fact that the agents had little opportunity to view the defendant); United States v. Mastberg, 503 F.2d 465 (9th Cir.1974) (permitting under Rule 701 the testimony of a customs inspector that the defendant appeared nervous); State v. Johnson, 221 Mont. 503 , 719 P.2d 1248, 1256-57 (1986) (holding that, in a prosecution for driving under the influenc…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
See United States v. Lundy, 809 F.2d 392, 395-96 (7th Cir. 1987) (noting that arson experts regularly rely upon "interviews with many witnesses to a fire" as a "standard investigating technique in cause and origin inquiries"); see also United States v. Lawson, 653 F.2d 299 , 302 n.7 (7th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1150 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cooper, Robert E. v. Nelson & Company
See United States v. Lundy, 809 F.2d 392, 395-96 (7th Cir.1987) (noting that arson experts regularly rely upon “interviews with many witnesses to a fire” as a “standard investigating technique in cause and origin inquiries”); see also United States v. Lawson, 653 F.2d 299 , 302 n.7 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1017 , 71 L.Ed.2d 305 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Asplundh Manufacturing Division v. Benton Harbor Engineering
See WEINSTEIN, supra, p 701 4 United States v. Langford, 802 F.2d 1176, 1178-79 (9th Cir.1986) (admitting identification testimony with respect to persons depicted in a bank surveillance photograph), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1008 , 107 S.Ct. 3235 , 97 L.Ed.2d 740 (1987); United States v. Allen, 787 F.2d 933, 935-37 (4th Cir.1986) (same), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 944 , 109 S.Ct. 371 , 102 L.Ed.2d 360 (1988); United States v. Farnsworth, 729 F.2d 1158, 1160-61 (8th Cir.1984) (same); United States v. Jackson, 688 F.2d 1121, 1125 (7th Cir.1982) (same), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1043 , 103 S.Ct. 1441 , 75…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alice Gong, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Ray F. Gong, Deceased v. Edward Hirsch, M.D.
It is not clear from the opinion whether the actual documents themselves were shown to the jury, but the court did allow the doctor “to summarize and draw conclusions from [the] notes and reports.” Id.; see also United States v. Lawson, 653 F.2d 299, 301-02 (7th Cir.1981) (holding essentially the same as Bramlet on very similar facts), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1017 , 71 L.Ed.2d 305 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Louis Rinchack
See, e.g., United States v. Lawson, 653 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1017 , 71 L.Ed.2d 305 (1982); Chavis, supra, 476 F.2d at 1143 ; Taylor, supra, 437 F.2d at 377 n. 8; cf. Grescher, supra, 802 F.2d at 376 (Section 3006A(e) expert not “necessary” if the testimony he would give can be provided by other witnesses).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Greco v. State
See also United States v. Blecker, 657 F.2d 629, 632 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1016 , 71 L.Ed.2d 304 (1982); United States v. Reed, 773 F.2d 477, 482 (2d Cir.1985) (“Established caselaw thus allows prosecutions under many federal statutes to be *476 brought in any district where the effects of the crime are felt”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Miller
See, e.g., State v. Guiden, 399 So.2d 194 (La.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1150 , 102 S.Ct. 1017 , 71 L.Ed.2d 305 (1982).
Engelstad
v.
Swenson
v.
Swenson
No. 81-991.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 11, 1982.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.