green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. Orozco
But see United States v. Hawkins, 661 F.2d 436, 451-52 (5th Cir.1981) cert. denied 456 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Collins v. United States
(2×)
See Bonen v. United States, 229 Ct.Cl. 144 , 666 F.2d 536, 539 (1981), cert. den. 456 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 2273 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1286 (1982) (the statutory limitation for challenging a military discharge is six years); Longhine v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. 920, 921-22 , 1982 WL 25276 (1982) (a claim against the government for wrongful discharge accrues on the date of discharge); 28 U.S.C. §§ 2401 & 2501. 2 The accrual date for claims of entitlement to a disability pension or other disability benefits is less certain.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Broussard
McKinney, 53 F.3d at 674 ; see United States v. Hawkins, 661 F.2d 436, 453 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982) (mixed verdicts indicate jury engaged in careful weighing of evidence against each defendant).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carmen Rosa Behety, Felino Ramirez-Valdez
See United States v. Hawkins, 661 F.2d 436, 455-56 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981) (DEA’s notification of Panamanian authorities regarding suspected crash of plane carrying cocaine insufficient to trigger Fourth Amendment protections), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982); United States v. Heller, 625 F.2d 594, 599-600 (5th Cir.1980) (tip from United States officials to British police regarding defendant insufficient to trigger Fourth Amendment); Morrow, 537 F.2d at 140 (communication between United States and Canadian law enforcement officials of name and number of in…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bailey
See United States v. Hawkins, 661 F.2d 436, 443 (5th Cir. Unit B Nov. 1981) (upholding selection process which resulted in under-representation of one division by approximately 2 grand jurors and over-representation of another division by approximately 1.5 grand jurors on an average panel of 23 members), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982); United States v. Maskeny, 609 F.2d 183, 191 (5th Cir.) (rejecting challenge based on under-representation of division by 3 grand jurors), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 921 , 100 S.Ct. 3010 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1980); see also Gregory…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth J. Masat
See United States v. McCarty, 665 F.2d 596, 597 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 2273 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carrazana
See United States v. Hawkins, 661 F.2d 436, 454 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982). 6 III.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carrazana
See United States v. Hawkins, 661 F.2d 436, 454 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982). 6 III.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lawrence Chavez Robert Clarke, AKA Bnd or Robert Clark Melaquias Sandoval Patrick Henry Zanzucchi Robert Matthew Zanzucchi
See Burt, 765 F.2d at 1367 (citing United States v. Hawkins, 661 F.2d 436, 451-52 (5th Cir.1981) (dicta), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dickey
See United States v. Hawkins, 661 F.2d 436, 454 (5th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 , 457 U.S. 1137 , 102 S.Ct. 2967 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1355 (1982); United States v. Watson, supra at 1340.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dickey
See United States v. Hawkins, 661 F.2d 436, 454 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 , 457 U.S. 1137 , 102 S.Ct. 2967 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1355 (1982); United States v. Watson, supra at 1340 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Douglas
Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357, 364 , 99 S.Ct. 664, 668 , 58 L.Ed.2d 579 (1979); see also United States v. Hawkins, 661 F.2d 436, 442 (5th Cir.1981) (quoting Duren), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mai v. United States
(2×)
See also Bonen v. United States, 229 Ct.Cl. 144, 148 , 666 F.2d 536, 539 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 2273 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1286 (1982); Kirby, supra, 201 Ct.Cl. at 531 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Leonard L. Payne
See, e.g., United States v. McCarty, 665 F.2d 596, 597-98 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 2273 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982); Cooley v. United States, 501 F.2d 1249, 1252-53 (9th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1123 , 95 S.Ct. 809 , 42 L.Ed.2d 824 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kern v. South Baltimore General Hospital
(2×)
Louis County, 575 S.W.2d 813 (Mo.1978), reh. denied, (1979); Galante v. Sandoz, Inc., 192 NJ.Super. 403, 470 A.2d 45 (1983), aff'd. 196 NJ.Super. 568, 483 A.2d 829 (1984); see also, Hughes Tool Co. v. Richards, 624 S.W.2d 598 (Tex.Civ.App.1981), reh. denied, cert. denied, 456 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 2272 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1286 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hannon v. United States
(2×)
For the reasons, and under the authorities, hereinafter appearing, it is concluded that defendant’s motion to dismiss should be granted, and that the complaint should be dismissed. 3 A claim against the United States for monetary relief founded upon a separation from active military service alleged to be unlawful accrues, within the meaning of section 2501, on “the date of the serviceman’s discharge from military service.” Monningh v. United States, 1 Cl.Ct. 427, 428 (1983); see also Bonen v. United States, 229 Ct.Cl. 144, 148 , 666 F.2d 536, 539 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 991 , 10…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Willcox v. United States
(2×)
Plaintiff alleges, and at least for present purposes defendant does not deny, that, contrary to the requirements of section 266(a), the 1974 and 1975 boards failed to contain “an appropriate number of Reserves.” See Stewart v. United States, supra. A claim under Section 1491, Title 28, United States Code, for monetary relief founded upon an asserted unlawful separation from active military service accrues, within the meaning of section 2501, on “the date of the serviceman’s discharge from military service.” Monningh v. United States, 1 Cl.Ct. 427, 428 (1983); see also Bonen v. United…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cohen
v.
United States and Carlone v. United States
v.
United States and Carlone v. United States
No. 81-1824; No. 81-1851.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 24, 1982.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 666 F. 2d 1112.