green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
Quoted verbatim 3×
6.5 score
G Cite
cited 6× by 2 distinct cases ·
"St. Mary of Nazareth "
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Tallahassee Branch of Naacp v. Leon County, Florida
(2×)
But see McMillan v. Escambia County, 559 F.Supp. 720, 723 (N.D.Fla.1984) (“[McDaniel ] was not mentioned in the appellate court’s decision for rehearing and, so this court is advised, the parties to the appeal did not call it to the appellate court’s attention.”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 830 , 104 S.Ct. 108 , 78 L.Ed.2d 110 (1983).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Agee
it is well established that the reopening of a case at any time for the introduction of additional evidence rests in the sound discretion of the trial court.
cited
Cited "see"
Watkins v. Williams
See Application of Angus (Or.App. 1982), 655 P.2d 208 , cert. denied (1983), 464 U.S. 830 , 104 S.Ct. 107 , 78 L.Ed.2d 109 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Chapin v. Knight-Ridder, Inc.
See National Foundation for Cancer Research, Inc. v. Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc., 705 F.2d 98, 101 (4th Cir.) (a charity that "thrusts itself into the public eye” through "massive solicitation efforts” is a public figure), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 830 , 104 S.Ct. 108 , 78 L.Ed.2d 110 (1983). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Chapin v. Knight-Ridder
See National Foundation for Cancer Research, Inc. v. Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc., 705 F.2d 98, 101 (4th Cir.) (a charity that "thrusts itself into the public eye" through "massive solicitation efforts" is a public figure), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 830 , 104 S.Ct. 108 , 78 L.Ed.2d 110 (1983) 5 The First Amendment requires that public figures prove by clear and convincing evidence that a false publication on a matter of public concern was made with "actual malice," which does not refer to ill will, but rather to knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of a "high degree of awareness…
cited
Cited "see"
Carl Ramsey, Legalware, Inc. v. Glassie Pewett Dudley Beebe & Shanks
See National Foundation for Cancer Research v. Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc., 705 F.2d 98 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 830 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Contemporary Mission, Inc. v. New York Times Co.
See National Foundation for Cancer Research, Inc. v. Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc., 705 F.2d 98, 101 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 830 , 104 S.Ct. 108 , 78 L.Ed.2d 110 (1983); Steaks Unlimited, Inc. v. Deaner, 623 F.2d 264, 273-74 (3d Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Contemporary Mission, Inc. v. The New York Times Company
See National Foundation for Cancer Research, Inc. v. Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc., 705 F.2d 98, 101 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 830 , 104 S.Ct. 108 , 78 L.Ed.2d 110 (1983); Steaks Unlimited, Inc. v. Deaner, 623 F.2d 264, 273-74 (3d Cir.1980). 41 Appellants also argue that the district court failed to make specific findings with respect to the public figure status of each of the individual priests and that it was improper for the court merely to equate the priests with Contemporary Mission.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Padgett
See United States v. Bentley, 706 F.2d 1498, 1510 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 830 , 104 S.Ct. 107 , 78 L.Ed.2d 110 (1983), and 467 U.S. 1209 , 104 S.Ct. 2397 , 81 L.Ed.2d 354 (1984); United States v. Fortes, 619 F.2d 108, 118 (1st Cir.1980); United States v. Hastings, 577 F.2d 38, 41-42 (8th Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hofmann v. Anderson
See also Angus v. Joseph, 60 Or App 546, 549 , 655 P2d 208 (1982), rev den 294 Or 569 , cert den 464 US 830 , 104 S Ct 107 , 78 L Ed 2d 109 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Larry W. Mayberry
See, e.g., United States v. Bentley, 706 F.2d 1498, 1506 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 830 , 104 S.Ct. 107 , 78 L.Ed.2d 110 , cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1209 , 104 S.Ct. 2397 , 81 L.Ed.2d 354 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Burlington Northern Inc., Successor by Merger to St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.
v.
Bair
v.
Bair
No. 82-2143.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1983.
Cited by 7 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (4) · Court of Appeals of Oregon (1)
Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied.