green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.7 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States of America and Keith R. Mueller, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Richard D. Clark, Cpa, and Joseph H. Thibodeau
employees of the banks can identify bank statements, cancelled checks and deposit slips which are prepared by or processed through the banks and can testify to their accuracy by comparing them to bank records.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Property, Parcel of Francisco Aguilar, Claimant-Appellant
See United States v. $2,500 in United States Currency, 689 F.2d 10 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied sub. nom., Aponte v. United States, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David Guity
See United States v. Blanton, 719 F.2d 815, 822 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1099 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. One Parcel of Property Located at 194 Quaker Farms Road
See United States v. $2,500 in United States Currency, 689 F.2d 10 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied sub. nom., Aponte v. United States, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. One Parcel of Property Located at 194 Quaker Farms Road, Oxford, Connecticut
See United States v. $2,500 in United States Currency, 689 F.2d 10 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied sub. nom., Aponte v. United States, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
National Audubon Society v. Hoffman
See Town of Orangetown v. Gorsuch, 718 F.2d 29, 34 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1592 , 80 L.Ed.2d 124 (1984). 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lawrence Watson
See United States v. Blanton, 700 F.2d 298, 309 (6th Cir.) (voir dire must provide enough information to allow effective use of peremptory challenges), opinion modified on other grounds, 719 F.2d 815 (1983) (en banc), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1099 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Parcels of Real Property With the Building, Appurtenances, & Improvements Located at 255 Broadway, Hanover
See United States v. $2,500 in U.S. Currency, 689 F.2d 10, 16 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 (1984) (in assessing probable cause for forfeiture, trial court properly considered $2,500 in cash as “substantially greater than is commonly kept in residential premises by law abiding wage earners”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Henry Sivils (90-6366) Jerry Stokes (90-6375) William Dillard (90-6376) and Sherrill Jordan (90-6420)
See United States v. *597 Blanton, 719 F.2d 815, 829-30 (6th Cir.1983) (en banc), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1592 , 80 L.Ed.2d 125 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Quigg
See Rivera v. Patino, 524 F.Supp. 136 (N.D.Cal.1981), rev’d, 714 F.2d 887 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 124 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Spooner
See United States v. $2,500.00 in U.S. Currency, 689 F.2d 10 (2d Cir.1982), cert, denied, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 , reh’g denied, 466 U.S. 994 , 104 S.Ct. 2376 , 80 L.Ed.2d 848 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Miguel Mada-Luna v. Eugene M. Fitzpatrick, Acting District Director, Immigration & Naturalization Service
(2×)
However, we have expressly “rejected the argument that, for the purposes of imposing notice-and-comment requirements on [an] agency for a particular rule, [courts should] look to the ‘substantial impact’ of the rule.” Alcaraz v. Block, 746 F.2d 593, 613 (9th Cir.1984) (citations omitted); accord Rivera v. Becerra, 714 F.2d 887, 890-91 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 124 (1984); see Southern California Edison Co. v. FERC, 770 F.2d 779 , 783 (9th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kay Apponi, Class Action, Cross-Appellants v. Sunshine Biscuits, Inc., Cross-Appellee
See United States v. Blanton, 700 F.2d 298, 313 (6th Cir.), adopted on reh’g, 719 F.2d 815, 833 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1592 , 80 L.Ed.2d 125 (1984); United States v. Phillips, 575 F.2d 97, 100 (6th Cir.1978); United States v. Jenkins, 525 F.2d 819, 824 (6th Cir.1975) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see"
Edwards v. Valdez
See Rivera v. Becerra, 714 F.2d 887, 893 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 124 (1984); Bowman v. Stumbo, 735 F.2d 192, 197 (6th Cir.1984); and Watkins v. Cantrell, 736 F.2d 933, 938-39 (4th Cir.1984); see also Mayberry v. Adams, 745 F.2d 729 (1st Cir.1984) (per curiam) (adopting the rationale of Watkins v. Cantrell). 6 The district court's analysis, therefore, was flawed from the outset.
discussed
Cited "see"
Edwards v. Valdez
See Rivera v. Becerra, 714 F.2d 887 , 893 (9th Cir.1983), cert, denied, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 124 (1984); Bowman v. Stumbo, 735 F.2d 192, 197 (6th Cir.1984); and Watkins v. Cantrell, 736 F.2d 933, 938-39 (4th Cir. 1984); see also Mayberry v. Adams, 745 F.2d 729 (1st Cir.1984) (per curiam) (adopting the rationale of Watkins v. Cantrell). 6 The district court’s analysis, therefore, was flawed from the outset.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Premises Known as 2639 Meetinghouse
See United States v. $2,500.00 in U.S. Currency, 689 F.2d 10 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 , reh’g denied, 466 U.S. 994 , 104 S.Ct. 2376 , 80 L.Ed.2d 848 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kermanshah v. Kermanshah
See, e.g., Town of Orangetown v. Gorsuch, 718 F.2d 29 , 42 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1592 , 80 L.Ed.2d 124 (1984); Porwick v. Fortis Benefits Ins.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kelly v. Sabretech Inc.
See, e.g., Jones v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, 681 F.2d 1376 (1982), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Erinkitola v. United States
See also United States v. $2,500 in U.S. Currency, 689 F.2d 10, 13 (2d Cir.1982) (stating in dicta that forfeiture of vehicles and money used in drug trafficking has a number of remedial, non-punitive purposes, including “impeding the success of the criminal enterprise by eliminating its resources and instrumentalities ... and helping to finance the government’s efforts to combat trafficking.”), cert. denied, Aponte v. U.S., 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bechtel Construction Co. v. Secretary of Labor
See, e.g., Jones v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Auth., 681 F.2d 1376, 1380 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Friends of the Ompompanoosuc, State of Vermont v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See 40 C.F.R. § 1508.13 (1991) (environmental impact statement required for major federal actions “significantly affecting the quality of the human environment”); see also Town of Orangetown v. Gorsuch, 718 F.2d 29, 34 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1592 , 80 L.Ed.2d 124 (1984); Hanly v. Kleindienst, 471 F.2d 823, 826 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 908 , 93 S.Ct. 2290 , 36 L.Ed.2d 974 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated May 9, 1990
See also United States v. Schlansky, 709 F.2d 1079, 1083 (6th Cir.1983) (Boyd may still protect private diary), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 (1984); In Re Grand Jury Proceedings (Johanson), 632 F.2d 1033, 1042-44 (3rd Cir.1980) (staunchly defending the vitality of Boyd , the history of the right against self-incrimination and holding that Fisher "in no way contradicts the proposition to which we today adhere: that the Fifth Amendment protects an accused from government-compelled disclosure of self-incriminating private papers, such as purely personal date books…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
ca4 1989
Sec. 881 (a)(6)); see also United States v. $2,500 in U.S. Currency, 689 F.2d 10, 13-14 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Santoro
United States v. Premises Known As 2639 Meetinghouse, 633 F.Supp. 979, 993-94 (E.D.Pa.1986) (construing 21 U.S.C. § 881 (a)(6)); see also United States v. $2,500 in U.S. Currency, 689 F.2d 10, 13-14 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Dennis v. United States
Compare, United States v. Schlansky, 709 F.2d 1079, 1082 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 123 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miller v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union, Local 2
See also Tulalip Tribes of Washington v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 732 F.2d 1451, 1454 (9th Cir.1984) ("Although a court is not absolutely forbidden from considering the legislative history when construing a statute which is plain on its face ... it is 'a step to be taken cautiously’.’’) (citing Rivera v. Becerra, 714 F.2d 887, 893 (9th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Donovan, 465 U.S. 1099 , 104 S.Ct. 1591 , 80 L.Ed.2d 124 (1984).
County of Oneida, New York
v.
Oneida Indian Nation of New York State and New York v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York State
v.
Oneida Indian Nation of New York State and New York v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York State
No. 83-1065; No. 83-1240.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 19, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted, cases consolidated, and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in these cases expressing the views of the United States. Reported below: 719 F. 2d 525.