green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
13.3 score
“the standard of review of a trial court's exclusion of evidence is abuse of discretion”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
O'Brien v. O'Brien
the standard of review of a trial court's exclusion of evidence is abuse of discretion
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Davis
(2×)
See State v. Watson, 449 So.2d 1321, 1326 (La.1984), cert de nied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 939 , 83 L.Ed.2d 952 (1985). “[T]he prosecution is entitled to prove its case by evidence of its own choice” and a defendant “may not stipulate or admit his way out of the full evidentiary force of the case as the government chooses to present it.” State v. Ball, 99-428 (La.11/30/99), 756 So.2d 275, 280 (quoting Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172, 186-87 , 117 S.Ct. 644 , 136 L.Ed.2d 574 (1997)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Larry Eugene Mann v. John Palmer
(2×)
See Mann v. Florida, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S. Ct. 940 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Larry Eugene Mann v. John Palmer
(2×)
See Mann v. Florida, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 940 , 83 L.Ed.2d 953 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dennis
(2×)
See State v. Watson, 449 So.2d 1321 (La.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 939 , 83 L.Ed.2d 952 (1985); State v. Broadway, 96-2659 (La.10/19/99), 753 So.2d 801 , cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1056 , 120 S.Ct. 1562 , 146 L.Ed.2d 466 (2000); and State v. Blank, 04-204 (La.4/11/07), 955 So.2d 90 , cert. denied, 552 U.S. 994 , 128 S.Ct. 494 , 169 L.Ed.2d 346 (2007).
cited
Cited "see"
Morgan v. State
See T.L.O., 469 U.S. at 346 , 105 S.Ct. 733 ; Toyota Land Cruiser, 277 S.W.3d at 91 .
cited
Cited "see"
Randy Eric Morgan v. State
See T.L.O., 469 U.S. at 346; Toyota Land Cruiser, 277 S.W.3d at 91 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Texas Department of Public Safety v. Axt
(2×)
See Muniz v. State, 851 S.W.2d 238, 251 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 837 , 114 S.Ct. 116 , 126 L.Ed.2d 82 (1993) ("In determining whether probable cause existed for the arrest, we examine the cumulative information known to all the officers who cooperated in the arrest.”) (citing Woodward v. State, 668 S.W.2d 337, 344 (Tex.Crim.App. 1982), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 939 , 83 L.Ed.2d 952 (1985)). .Because of my disposition of the Department's first two issues, I would not need to reach its third issue.
cited
Cited "see"
Anderson v. State
See Blanco v. State, 452 So.2d 520, 524 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 940 , 83 L.Ed.2d 953 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Sliney v. State
Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 404.17 (1993 ed.); see Gorham v. State, 454 So.2d 556, 558 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 941 , 83 L.Ed.2d 953 (1985); Erickson v. State, 565 So.2d 328, 332-33 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), review denied, 576 So.2d 286 (Fla.1991); Tumulty v. State, 489 So.2d 150, 153 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 496 So.2d 144 (Fla.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Hernandez
See Blanco v. State, 452 So.2d 520, 524 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 940 , 83 L.Ed.2d 953 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Ima McAdams, Individually and as of the Estate of J.Y. McAdams, and Barbara McAdams Billups v. J.Y. JR. (J.T.) McAdams and Annie McAdams
See T.L.O. , 469 U.S. at 346; Toyota Land Cruiser , 277 S.W.3d at 91 .
cited
Cited "see"
Walker v. State
See Blanco v. State, 452 So.2d 520, 524 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 940 , 83 L.Ed.2d 953 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stewart
See Solomon v. Kemp, 735 F.2d 395, 404 (11th Cir.1984) (‘While attorneys may disagree as to how many or what particular witnesses to call, such is the stuff out of which trials are made.”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 940 , 83 L.Ed.2d 952 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Stoltzfus v. State
See Blanco v. State, 452 So.2d 520 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 940 , 83 L.Ed.2d 953 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rankin v. Evans
See Blanco v. State, 452 So.2d 520, 523 (Fla.1984) ("The probable cause standard for a law enforcement officer to make a legal arrest is whether the officer has reasonable grounds to believe the person has committed a felony.”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 940 , 83 L.Ed.2d 953 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. State
(2×)
See Woodward v. State, 668 S.W.2d 337, 344-45 (Tex.Crim.App.1982) (op on reh’g), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 939 , 83 L.Ed.2d 952 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Givens v. State
(2×)
See Woodward v. State, 668 S.W.2d 337, 344-45 (Tex.Crim.App.1982) (op. on reh’g), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 939 , 83 L.Ed.2d 952 (1985).
examined
Cited "see"
Isabel Arias v. United States Service Industries, Inc.
(3×)
See, e.g., Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 567 F.2d 429, 461-62 (D.C.Cir.1976) (The court rejected “a definition of “willful’ in the suit-limitation provision which would demand proof that the employer entertained a bad purpose or an evil intent;”' rather, the court held that an employer’s noncompliance with the FLSA “is ‘willful’ when he is cognizant of an appreciable possibility that he may be subject to the statutory requirements and .... consciously and voluntarily charts a course which turns out to be wrong.”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1281 , 55 L.Ed.2d…
discussed
Cited "see"
Franklin v. State
See Blanco v. State, 452 So.2d 520 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 940 , 83 L.Ed.2d 953 (1985); State v. Gavin, 594 So.2d 345 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); State v. Viamari, 462 So.2d 1154 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eurus Kelly Waters v. Albert G. Thomas, Warden Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center
(2×)
See Solomon v. Kemp, 735 F.2d 395, 404 (11th Cir.1984) (“While attorneys may disagree as to how many or what particular witnesses to call, such is the stuff out of which trials are made.”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 940 , 83 L.Ed.2d 952 (1985). 2.
cited
Cited "see"
Pittman v. State
See Gorham v. State, 454 So.2d 556, 558 (Fla. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , *171 105 S.Ct. 941 , 83 L.Ed.2d 953 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Scott
See Blanco v. State, 452 So.2d 520, 523 (Fla. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 940 , 83 L.Ed.2d 953 (1985); Robinson v. State, 556 So.2d 450 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). *520 The defendant was stopped approximately ten minutes after the B.O.L.O. was dispatched, and was found only a few blocks from the area indicated in the B.O.L.O.
discussed
Cited "see"
Griffin v. State
Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 404.17 (1993 ed.); see Gorham v. State, 454 So.2d 556, 558 (Fla. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 941 , 83 L.Ed.2d 953 (1985); Erickson v. State, 565 So.2d 328, 332-33 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), review denied, 576 So.2d 286 (Fla. 1991); Tumulty v. State, 489 So.2d 150, 153 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 496 So.2d 144 (Fla. 1986). *969 We turn now to the facts of the instant case.
examined
Cited "see"
Farmah v. State
(4×)
See Woodward v. State, 668 S.W.2d 337, 345 (Tex.Cr.App.1982) (op. on reh’g), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 939 , 83 L.Ed.2d 952 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Parnell v. State
See Blanco v. State, 452 So.2d 520 (Fla. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 940 , 83 L.Ed.2d 953 (1985); State v. Guerra, 455 So.2d 1046 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), rev. denied, 461 So.2d 114 (Fla. 1985); Lecoin v. State, 418 So.2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Bennett
(2×)
See State v. Watson, 449 So.2d 1321 (La.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 939 , 83 L.Ed.2d 952 (1985); State v. Mims, 524 So.2d 526 (La.App. 2d Cir.), writ denied, 531 So.2d 267 (La.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Williams
(2×)
See State v. Watson, 449 So.2d 1321, 1326 (La. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 939 , 83 L.Ed.2d 952 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Pace v. State
See Blanco v. State, 452 So.2d 520 (Fla. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 940 , 83 L.Ed.2d 953 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Anderson v. State
See Blanco v. State, 452 So.2d 520, 524 (Fla. 1984) (defendant's decision to call witnesses contrary to counsel's advice and his best interest ultimately was the defendant's decision to make), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 940 , 83 L.Ed.2d 953 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
James Alfonso Greene v. United States
See generally Solomon v. Kemp, 735 F.2d 395, 402 (11th Cir.1984) (counsel not obligated to pursue every potentially available avenue of investigation until it succeeds), cert denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 940 , 83 L.Ed.2d 952 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Norton, United States of America v. Paul Fosco, James Pinckard, Paul A. Di Franco, James Norton, Defendants
Although a prosecutor’s direct reference to a defendant’s failure to testify clearly violates the defendant’s fifth amendment right against self incrimination, entitling him to a new trial, see Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609, 612-14 , 85 S.Ct. 1229, 1232-33 , 14 L.Ed.2d 106, 108 (1965); accord Solomon v. Kemp, 735 F.2d 395, 401 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 940 , 83 L.Ed.2d 952 (1985), an indirect reference to such a failure is not reversible error per se.
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Rayfield Russ and Harvey T. McLain
(3×)
See Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 740 F.2d 1071, 1089 (D.C.Cir.1984) (challenge to calculation of back pay awards waived by not raising on first appeal), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 939 , 83 L.Ed.2d 951 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Brown v. State
See Gorham v. State, 454 So.2d 556, 559 (Fla. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 941 , 83 L.Ed.2d 953 (1985); Lewis v. State, 377 So.2d 640 (Fla. 1979).
examined
Cited "see"
John Brogdon v. Robert Hilton Butler, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary at Angola, Louisiana
(4×)
See State v. Watson, 449 So.2d 1321, 1326 (La.1984) ("An offered stipulation bears upon this balancing test, but the decision is primarily one for the trial court."), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 939 , 83 L.Ed.2d 952 (1985).
examined
Cited "see"
King v. Palmer
(3×)
See Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 740 F.2d 1071 , 1102 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 939 , 83 L.Ed.2d 951 (1985); Higgins v. State of Oklahoma, 642 F.2d 1199, 1203 (10th Cir. 1981); Acosta v. University of District of Columbia, 528 F.Supp. 1215, 1224 (D.D.C.1981); compare Blake v. Califano, 626 F.2d 891, 895 (D.C.Cir.1980) (“[A]n award of prejudgment interest would be consistent with the remedial purposes of Title VII,” but prejudgment interest may not be awarded against a federal employer); compare also Schneider v. Lockheed Aircraft Corporation, 658 F.2d 8…
discussed
Cited "see"
William Dove v. George A. Coupe, James Dovean Jewell v. George A. Coupe, D/B/A Admiral Limousine Service
(2×)
See Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 740 F.2d 1071, 1096 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 939 , 83 L.Ed.2d 951 (1985), and cases' cited therein.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Shipman v. State
(4×)
Id.; see also, Woodward v. State, 668 S.W.2d 337 (Tex.Crim.App.1982, op. on reh’g), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 939 , 83 L.Ed.2d 952 (1985).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Hawai'i Organization of Police Officers v. Society of Professional Journalists-University of Hawai'i Chapter
(3×)
See, e.g., Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, 582 F.Supp. 280, 283 (D.D.C.1982) (holding that “rights secured to employees by the Equal Pay Act cannot be collectively bargained away”), rev’d in part on other grounds, 740 F.2d 1071 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 939 , 83 L.Ed.2d 951 (1985); Craik v. Minnesota State Univ.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Clark v. State
See, e.g., Gorham v. State, 454 So.2d 556, 559 (Fla. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 941 , 83 L.Ed.2d 953 (1985).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Amores v. State
(4×)
See, e.g., Woodward v. State, 668 S.W.2d 337 (Tex.Cr.App.1982) (opinion on rehearing), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 939 , 83 L.Ed.2d 952 (1985); see also Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 176 , 69 S.Ct. 1302, 1308 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1949).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Murry v. State
Compare Mann v. State, 453 So.2d 784 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 940 , 83 L.Ed.2d 953 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cherry v. State
See also Blanco v. State, 452 So.2d 520, 525 (Fla. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 940 , 83 L.Ed.2d 953 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William Duane Elledge v. Richard L. Dugger
(2×)
See, e.g., Mann v. State, 453 So.2d 784, 785 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 940 , 83 L.Ed.2d 953 (1985); Adams v. State, 412 So.2d 850, 854, 857 (Fla.1982) (three mitigating factors, including that the capital offense was committed while defendant was under the influence of extreme mental or emotional disturbance, outweighed by three aggravating circumstances), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 1506 , 89 L.Ed.2d 906 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hoag v. State
(2×)
See Martinez v. State, 635 S.W.2d 629 (Tex.App — Austin 1982, pet. ref’d) (where cumulative information developed into reasonable suspicion to justify temporary detention); see also Woodward v. State, 668 S.W.2d 337 (Tex.Cr.App.1982), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 939 , 83 L.Ed.2d 952 (1985) (where cumulative information developed into probable cause to arrest).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Maldonado v. Lehman
(3×)
See, e.g., Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 746 F.2d 4 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 939 , 83 L.Ed.2d 951 (1985).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Maldonado v. Lehman
(3×)
See, e.g., Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 746 F.2d 4 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 939 , 83 L.Ed.2d 951 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jackson v. State
See, e.g., Blanco v. State, 452 So.2d 520 (Fla. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 940 , 83 L.Ed.2d 953 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harrison v. Dole
(2×)
In fashioning relief for victims of employment discrimination, the aim is “ ‘to make the victims of unlawful discrimination whole’ by restoring them, ‘so far as possible ... to a position where they would have been were it not for the unlawful discrimination.’ ” Ford Motor Co. v. E.E.O.C., 458 U.S. 219, 230 , 102 S.Ct. 3057, 3064-65 , 73 L.Ed.2d 721 (1982) (quoting Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody, 422 U.S. 405, 421 , 95 S.Ct. 2362, 2373 , 45 L.Ed.2d 280 (1975)); see also Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, 740 F.2d 1071 , 1088 (D.C.Cir.1984) cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 939 , 83 L.…
Northwest Airlines, Inc.
v.
Laffey
v.
Laffey
No. 84-825.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 14, 1985.
Consideration, Motion, Took.
Cited by 42 opinions | Published
Citer courts: District Court of Appeal of Fl… (1)
C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of Chamber of Commerce of the United States for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certio-rari denied.