green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.4 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Green v. State
as for closing argument, attorneys are generally allowed to replay excerpts from recorded testimony, which is analogous to reading excerpts from the record.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. McGuire
See United States v. Flake, 746 F.2d 535, 537-38 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1225 , 105 S.Ct. 1220 , 84 L.Ed.2d 360 (1985); United States v. Valdez, 594 F.2d 725, 728-29 (9th Cir.1979); see also United States v. Gaudin, 28 F.3d 943, 946 (9th Cir.1994) (en banc), affd., --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 2310 , 132 L.Ed.2d 444 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jimmy D. McGuire
(2×)
See United States v. Flake, 746 F.2d 535, 537-38 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1225 , 105 S.Ct. 1220 , 84 L.Ed.2d 360 (1985); United States v. Valdez, 594 F.2d 725, 728-29 (9th Cir.1979); see also United States v. Gaudin, 28 F.3d 943, 946 (9th Cir.1994) (en banc), affd., --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 2310 , 132 L.Ed.2d 444 (1995). 22 Shortly after McGuire's conviction, the Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc in Gaudin, turned the exception into the rule.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carlos Javier Marulanda
See United States v. Flake, 746 F.2d 535, 540-41 (9th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1225 (1985). 13 Marulanda next contends that the AUSA improperly commented on the role of the jury.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wright
Moreover, in the absence of plain error, “[a] defendant’s failure to object to an alleged error [during trial] generally precludes him from asserting the claimed error in a motion for a new trial.” United States v. McBride, 862 F.2d 1316, 1319 (8th Cir.1988); see United States v. Flake, 746 F.2d 535, 543 (9th Cir.1984) (“The failure to object to an instruction before the trial court is a bar to any challenge before this court in the absence of plain error.”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1225 , 84 L.Ed.2d 360 (1985); United States v. Bevans, 728 F.Supp. 340, 346 (E.D.Pa.) (incompetency of …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Darell Wayne Lee
See United States v. Guess, 745 F.2d 1286, 1288 (9th Cir.1984) (improprieties in counsel's arguments to the jury do not constitute reversible error unless they are so gross as probably to prejudice the defendant, and the prejudice has not been neutralized by the trial judge) (internal citations omitted), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1225 (1985). 14 In addition to arguing that no possible instruction could neutralize the prejudice created by the prosecutor's misstatement, Lee contends that the instruction given did not cure the error because it failed expressly to say that the prosecutor's closing ar…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lee Hitow (88-1970) David Long (88-2033)
See United States v. Guess, 745 F.2d 1286, 1288 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1225 , 105 S.Ct. 1219 , 84 L.Ed.2d 360 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Vito Spillone, United States of America v. John Clyde Abel, United States of America v. Frank Citro
(2×)
See United States v. Flake, 746 F.2d 535, 539 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1225 , 105 S.Ct. 1220 , 84.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Dymowski
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Guess, 745 F.2d 1286, 1289 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1225 , 105 S.Ct. 1219 , 84 L.Ed.2d 360 (1985); United States v. Mansaw, 714 F.2d 785, 790 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 964 , 104 S.Ct. 403 78 L.Ed.2d 343 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Baird
Although defendant is correct that it was improper for the prosecutor to use the transcript in his rebuttal argument, “[i]mproper argument by the prosecutor is not grounds for reversal unless there is ‘substantial prejudice as well as error.’ ” United States v. Kim, 595 F.2d 755, 768 (D.C.Cir.1979) (quoting Cross v. United States, 353 F.2d 454, 456 (D.C.Cir. 1965)); see also United States v. Flake, 746 F.2d 535, 542 (9th Cir.1984) (“Improprieties in counsel’s argument to the jury do not require a new trial unless they ‘are “so gross as probably to prejudice the defendant,” an…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Clemmer
See, e.g., United States v. Flake, 746 F.2d 535, 537 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1225 , 105 S.Ct. 1220 , 84 L.Ed.2d 360 (1984); United States v. Holecek, 739 F.2d 331, 337 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1218 , 105 S.Ct. 1200 , 84 L.Ed.2d 343 (1984); United States v. Greenberg, 735 F.2d 29, 31 (2d Cir.1984); United States v. Whyte, 699 F.2d 375, 379 (7th Cir.1983); United States v. Gaines, 690 F.2d 849, 858 (11th Cir.1982); United States v. Strand, 617 F.2d 571, 574 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 841 , 101 S.Ct. 120 , 66 L.Ed.2d 48 (1980); United States v. Taylor, 574 F.2d 232, …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Donald P. Brown
See, e.g., United States v. Guess, 745 F.2d 1286, 1289 (9th Cir.1984), certiorari denied, 469 U.S. 1225 , 105 S.Ct. 1219 , 84 L.Ed.2d 360 ; United States v. Coronel-Quintana, 752 F.2d 1284, 1288 (8th Cir.1985), certiorari denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 66 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 ; United States v. Swift, 809 F.2d 320, 323 (6th Cir.1987); United States v. Free, 841 F.2d 321, 324 (9th Cir.1988), certiorari denied, - U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 2042 , 100 L.Ed.2d 626 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joe Dean Swift (86-1079), James C. Hettmansperger (86-1083)
See, e.g., United States v. Guess, 745 F.2d 1286, 1289 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1225 , 105 S.Ct. 1219 , 84 L.Ed.2d 360 (1985); United States v. Mansaw, 714 F.2d 785, 790 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 964 , 104 S.Ct. 403 , 78 L.Ed.2d 343 (1983).
Miner
v.
Arkansas
v.
Arkansas
No. 84-5988.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 1985.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Special Appeals of Ma… (1)
Sup. Ct. Ark. Certiorari denied.