green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.0 score
“e hold that as a matter of law, the freeing-up theory cannot justify withdrawing all state funds from otherwise eligible entities merely because they engage in abortion-related activities disfavored by the state.”
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State Of Ohio v. Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services
e hold that as a matter of law, the freeing-up theory cannot justify withdrawing all state funds from otherwise eligible entities merely because they engage in abortion-related activities disfavored by the state.
discussed
Cited "see"
International Business Machines Corp. v. Director
“The absence of any amendment to a statute following an Attorney General’s formal opinion strongly suggests that the views expressed therein were consistent with legislative intent.” State v. Son, 179 N.J.Super. 549, 553 , 432 A.2d 947 (App.Div.1981); accord Garfield Trust Co. v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 6 N.J.Tax 462, 471 (Tax 1984), aff'd, 7 N.J.Tax 664 (App.Div.1985), aff'd, 102 N.J. 420 , 508 A.2d 1104 , app. dis., 479 U.S. 925 , 107 S.Ct. 390 , 93 L.Ed.2d 345 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
EOG RESOURCES, INC. v. Chesapeake Energy Corp.
See Nunez v. Wainoco Oil & Gas Co., 488 So.2d 955, 961 (La.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 925 , 107 S.Ct. 391 , 93 L.Ed.2d 345 (1986) (describing the Commissioner’s powers).
discussed
Cited "see"
AMERICAN FIRE v. NJ Div. of Tax.
See Garfield Trust Co. v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 102 N.J. 420, 433 , 508 A.2d 1104, 1111 (finding that it is the duty of the court to construe a statute in a manner that would render it constitutional, if reasonably susceptible to such interpretation), appeal *360 dismissed, 479 U.S. 925 , 107 S.Ct. 390 , 93 L.Ed. 2d 345 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
American Fire & Casualty Co. v. New Jersey Division of Taxation
See Garfield Trust Co. v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 102 N.J. 420, 433 , 508 A.2d 1104, 1111 (finding that it is the duty of the court to construe a statute in a manner that would render it constitutional, if reasonably susceptible to such interpretation), appeal dismissed, 479 U.S. 925 , 107 S.Ct. 390 , 93 L.Ed.2d 345 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pacific First Federal Savings Bank v. Department of Revenue
See Garfield Trust Co. v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 102 NJ 420, 508 A2d 1104 , appeal dismissed 479 US 925 (1986); Savings League v. Revenue Dept., 141 Wis 2d 918 , 416 NW2d 650 (1987), appeal dismissed_US _, 109 S Ct 37 , 102 L Ed 2d 16 (1988); Dept. of Revenue v. First Union Nat.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Morley-Murphy Co. v. Zenith Electronics Corp.
(2×)
As the court of appeals recognized in Kealey, 761 F.2d 345 , the statute was “intended ‘to protect the thousands of small businessmen in Wisconsin who are franchisees.’ ” Id. at 349 (quoting Foerster, Inc. v. Atlas Metal Parts Co., 105 Wis.2d 17 , 313 N.W.2d 60 (1981)); see also Remus v. Amoco Oil Co., 794 F.2d 1238, 1240 (7th Cir.) (“The statute’s main purpose is to give dealers a kind of tenure — like federal judges, or teachers, or workers in establishments covered by collective bargaining contracts.”), cert. dismissed, 479 U.S. 925 , 107 S.Ct. 333 , 93 L.Ed.2d 345 (1986); s…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Remus
v.
Amoco Oil Co.
v.
Amoco Oil Co.
No. 86-548.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 30, 1986.
Cited by 7 opinions | Published
Citer courts: S.D. Ohio (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 53.