green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Scott v. Richey
Regardless, participation in the narcotics program rendered him eligible to apply for the FRP but “does not automatically entitle him to participate in the FRP” (Matter of Payne v Goord, 12 AD3d 733, 734 [2004]; see Matter of Doe v Coughlin, 71 NY2d 48, 55-56 [1987], cert denied 488 US 879 [1988]).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bezio v. Dorsey
Under that standard, “when a policy or regulation impinges on a prisoner’s constitutional rights, the action is valid if it is reasonably related to legitimate penological interests” (Matter of Walton v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 13 NY3d 475, 491 [2009] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Matter of Doe v Coughlin, 71 NY2d 48 [1987], cert denied 488 US 879 [1988]; Matter of Lucas v Scully, 71 NY2d 399 [1988]).
discussed
Cited "see"
Couser v. Goord
In determining whether a particular prisoner shall be granted participation in the FRR respondents must consider and balance a number of delineated factors, including whether the prisoner has “been convicted of heinous or unusual crimes” (7 NYCRR 220.2 [c] [1] [iii]; see Matter of Doe v Coughlin, 71 NY2d 48, 55 [1987], cert denied 488 US 879 [1988]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gordon v. WOODBOURNE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
See Palmer, 364 F.3d at 64 n. 2; Champion v. Artuz, 76 F.3d 483, 486 (2d Cir.1996); Hernandez, 18 F.3d at 137 (“The Constitution ... does not create any protected guarantee to conjugal visitation privileges while incarcerated.... [E]ven though the right to marriage is constitutionally protected for inmates, the right to marital privacy and conjugal visits while incarcerated is not.”); see also Doe v. Coughlin, 71 N.Y.2d 48, 54 , 523 N.Y.S.2d 782 , 518 N.E.2d 536, 540 (1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 879 , 109 S.Ct. 196 , 102 L.Ed.2d 166 (1988) (holding that neither a prisoner nor his spouse …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McMoore v. Greene
Matter of Applegate v Coughlin, 226 AD2d 848 [1996], lv denied 88 NY2d 810 [1996]; Matter of Thurman v Kelly, 127 AD2d 993 [1987]; compare Matter of Doe v Coughlin, 71 NY2d 48, 52 [1987], cert denied 488 US 879 [1988]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hernandez v. Robles
(See Loving, 388 US 1 [1967], supra [holding that Virginia’s statutory scheme to prevent marriages between persons solely on the basis of racial classifications violates the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment]; see also Matter of Doe v Coughlin, 71 NY2d 48, 63 [1987, Alexander, J., dissenting], rearg denied 70 NY2d 1002 [1988], cert denied 488 US 879 [1988], citing Roe v Wade, 410 US 113 [1973] [abortion]; Eisenstadt v Baird, 405 US 438 [1972] [contraception]; Loving v Virginia, 388 US 1 [1967] [interracial marriage]; Griswold v Connecticut, 381 US 479 [1965…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nuzzo v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.
Compare Jackson, 863 F.2d at 117 (state right to privacy claim preempted) and O’Brien, 972 F.2d at 5 (state physical disability discrimination claim preempted) with McCall v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry., 844 F.2d 294, 302 (6th Cir.) (state racial discrimination claim not preempted), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 879 , 109 S.Ct. 196 , 102 L.Ed.2d 166 (1988) and Lingle, 486 U.S. 399, 406-07 , 108 S.Ct. 1877, 1882 (1988) (state retaliatory discharge claim not preempted). 3.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bell v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
R.A.: Breininger v. Sheet Metal Workers, 493 U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 424 , 107 L.Ed.2d 388 (1989); DelCostello v. Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151 , 103 S.Ct. 2281 , 76 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983); United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Mitchell, 451 U.S. 56 , 101 S.Ct. 1559 , 67 L.Ed.2d 732 (1981) (Stewart, J., concurring in judgment); and cases involving the L.M.R.A.: Electrical Workers v. Hechler, 481 U.S. 851 , 107 S.Ct. 2161 , 95 L.Ed.2d 791 (1987); See also McCall v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., 844 F.2d 294 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 879 , 109 S.Ct. 196 , 102 L.Ed.2d 166 (1988) (Doctrine of Preemption).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Doe
v.
Coughlin, Commissioner, New York State Department of Correctional Services
v.
Coughlin, Commissioner, New York State Department of Correctional Services
No. 87-7303.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1988.
Published
Ct. App. N. Y. Motion of petitioner to seal portions of the petition for writ of certiorari granted. Certiorari denied.