green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Yannai
See generally United States v. Scopo, 861 F.2d 339, 349 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1048 , 109 S.Ct. 1957 , 104 L.Ed.2d 426 (1989); United *247 States v. Gaggi, 811 F.2d 47, 51 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 929 , 107 S.Ct. 3214 , 96 L.Ed.2d 701 (1987); United States v. Gigante, 729 F.2d 78, 82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1206 , 104 S.Ct. 2390 , 81 L.Ed.2d 348 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bayou Fleet, Inc. v. Alexander
See Video Int’l Prod., Inc. v. Warner-Amex Cable Communications, Inc., 858 F.2d 1075, 1084 (5th Cir.1988) (the Noerr-Pennington doctrine, which originally arose in the antitrust field, has been extended to protect first amendment petitioning of the government from claims brought under federal and state laws”), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1047 , 109 S.Ct. 1955 , 104 L.Ed.2d 424 (1989)(citing Evers v. County of Custer, 745 F.2d 1196, 1204 (9th Cir.1984); Gorman Towers, Inc. v. Bogoslavsky, 626 F.2d 607, 614 (8th Cir.1980)); see also Kottle v. Northwest Kidney Centers, 146 F.3d 1056 (9th Cir.1998)…
discussed
Cited "see"
First State Bank Of Floodwood v. Jubie
Accord Video Int'l Prod., Inc. v. Warner-Amex Cable Commun., Inc., 858 F.2d 1075, 1085-86 (5th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1047 , 109 S.Ct. 1955 , 104 L.Ed.2d 424 , and 491 U.S. 906 , 109 S.Ct. 3189 , 105 L.Ed.2d 697 (1989). 11 This case is very different.
discussed
Cited "see"
First State Bank of Floodwood v. Jubie
Accord Video Int’l Prod., Inc. v. Warner-Amex Cable Commun., Inc., 858 F.2d 1075, 1085-86 (5th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1047 , 109 S.Ct. 1955 , 104 L.Ed.2d 424 , and 491 U.S. 906 , 109 S.Ct. 3189 , 105 L.Ed.2d 697 (1989). *759 This case is very different.
cited
Cited "see"
Cambridge Plating Co. v. Napco, Inc.
See Frank Briscoe Co., Inc. v. Clark County, 857 F.2d 606, 614 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1048 , 109 S.Ct. 1957 , 104 L.Ed.2d 426 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hogan v. Warden
See Polaroid Corp. v. Eastman Kodak, Co., 867 F.2d 1415 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1047 , 109 S.Ct. 1956 , 104 L.Ed.2d 425 (1989) (concluding that fundamental fairness precluded vacation of judge's orders rendered over six-year period because there was little risk of injustice in other cases, public's confidence in integrity of judicial system was less likely undermined if rulings were adhered to than if vacated years later on grounds other than merits, and party bringing motion knew about disqualifying facts but remained silent). [5] See also United States v. Cooley, 1 F.3d 985, 993 (…
discussed
Cited "see"
Perry v. Norris
See United States v. Scopo, 861 F.2d 339, 348 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1048 , 109 S.Ct. 1957 , 104 L.Ed.2d 426 (1989); cf. United States v. Rogers, 549 F.2d 490 , 498 n. 8 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 918 , 97 S.Ct. 2182 , 53 L.Ed.2d 229 (1977). 20 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATES
See Polaroid Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 867 F.2d 1415, 1420 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1047 (1989) (“the risk of injustice to the parties weights far more heavily on [HBC’s] side of the scales; . . . and the public’s confidence in the judicial process . . . would be more likely to be undermined if the law were to countenance a sundering of the result [almost four years] later on grounds other than the merits”). 2.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rohrbach v. AT & T Nassau Metals Corp.
See e.g., Polaroid Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 867 F.2d 1415, 1421 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1047 , 109 S.Ct. 1956 , 104 L.Ed.2d 425 (1989); Parker v. Connors Steel Co., 855 F.2d 1510, 1527-28 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1066 , 109 S.Ct. 2066 , 104 L.Ed.2d 631 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cortina v. Sovran Bank, N.A.
See, e.g., International Brotherhood of Boilermakers v. Local Lodge Dill of Cement, Lime, Gypsum and Allied Workers Div. of the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, 858 F.2d 1559 , 1561 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1047 , 109 S.Ct. 1955 , 104 L.Ed.2d 424 (1989); Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. v. F.T.C., 849 F.2d 1354, 1360 (11th Cir.1988), reh’g. denied, 859 F.2d 928 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1041 , 109 S.Ct. 865 , 102 L.Ed.2d 989 (1989) (where language of contract is unambiguous, legal effect of language is a question of law).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Herbert Oliver, Sr., and Mary L. Oliver v. United States of America, Herbert Oliver, Sr. Mary L. Oliver, and Geoffrey P. Chism and Stanislaw, Ashbaugh, Chism, Jacobson & Riper v. United States of America, Herbert Oliver, Sr. Mary L. Oliver v. United States v. Ronald P. Baker Old National Bank of Washington, Third-Party-Defendants
Thereafter, the burden shifted to Mary Oliver to show that she was not liable for the assessment. 12 The district court's instruction on the burden of proof failed to explain that the government has the initial burden of proof on its counterclaim. " '[W]hen an appellate court ponders the probable effect of an error on a civil trial, it need only find that the jury's verdict is more probably than not untainted by the error.' " Lucero v. Stewart, 892 F.2d 52, 55 (9th Cir.1989) (quoting Haddad v. Lockheed Cal. Corp., 720 F.2d 1454, 1459 (9th Cir.1983)); see also Frank Briscoe Co., Inc. v. Clark C…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Oliver v. United States
The district court’s instruction on the burden of proof failed to explain that the government has the initial burden of proof on its counterclaim. “ ‘[W]hen an appellate court ponders the probable effect of an error on a civil trial, it need only find that the jury’s verdict is more probably than not untainted by the error.’ ” Lucero v. Stewart, 892 F.2d 52, 55 (9th Cir.1989) (quoting Haddad v. Lockheed Cal. Corp., 720 F.2d 1454, 1459 (9th Cir.1983)); see also Frank Briscoe Co., Inc. v. Clark County, 857 F.2d 606, 612 (9th Cir.1988) (“erroneous instructions ‘need only be more p…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Baker et ux.
v.
Pierce, of the Estate of Baker
v.
Pierce, of the Estate of Baker
No. 88-1539.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 1, 1989.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.