green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.2 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[T]he issue of ripeness has nothing to do with the merits of claims' ...”
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ernst & Young v. Depositors Economic Protection Corp.
he issue of ripeness has nothing to do with the merits of claims' ...
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Han
See United States v. Quiroz, 13 F.3d 505, 514 (2d Cir.1993) (citing United States v. Diaz, 878 F.2d 608, 614 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 993 , 110 S.Ct. 543 , 107 L.Ed.2d 540 (1989); United States v. Cruz, 797 F.2d 90, 95 (2d Cir.1986)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Anglin
See United States v. Diaz, 878 F.2d 608, 614 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 993 , 110 S.Ct. 543 , 107 L.Ed.2d 540 (1989) (Rule 401); Salameh, 152 F.3d at 110 (Rule 403).
cited
Cited "see"
Failla v. City of Passaic
See Bradford-White Corp. v. Ernst & Whinney, 872 F.2d 1153, 1158 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 993 , 110 S.Ct. 542 , 107 L.Ed.2d 539 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Failla v. City of Passaic
See Bradford-White Corp. v. Ernst & Whinney, 872 F.2d 1153, 1158 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 993 , 110 S.Ct. 542 , 107 L.Ed.2d 539 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
James Huston Jones, and All Others Similarly Situated v. Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles
Accord Raske v. Martinez, 876 F.2d 1496, 1501 (11th Cir.) (retrospective application of rule changing amount of available incentive gain time violated Ex Post Facto Clause notwithstanding fact that awards were discretionary under both old and new regimes), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 993 , 110 S.Ct. 543 , 107 L.Ed.2d 540 (1989); Flemming v. Oregon Board of Parole, 998 F.2d 721, 724-26 (9th Cir.1993) (Supreme Court’s consistent teaching that prisoner need not' show that she certainly would have served a lesser sentence under previous rule "leaves open the door to claims of ex post facto violations…
cited
Cited "see"
Hyatt v. Northrop Corp.
See Bradford-White Corp. v. Ernst & Whinney, 872 F.2d 1153, 1161 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 993 , 110 S.Ct. 542 , 107 L.Ed.2d 539 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
John R. Mason v. United States
See Gunn v. Newsome, 881 F.2d 949, 959 (11th Cir.1989) (case involving 2254 motion), cert denied, 493 U.S. 993 (1989); but see United States v. Flores, 981 F.2d 231, 236 (5th Cir.1993) ("Flores' pro se status does not amount to cause for his failure to raise the claims in his first [2255] motion."). 4 In any event, the government must plead abuse of the writ in the district court with sufficient clarity and particularity to put the petitioner on notice of the abuse claim, and the petitioner must respond to the charge.
cited
Cited "see"
Leon Burgess v. Dick Moore Gary Blanks Michael Groose David Dobson Tony Lander Gerald Bommel, Caseworker Eric Franks
See Bolin v. Black, 875 F.2d 1343, 1347 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 993 , 110 S.Ct. 542 , 107 L.Ed.2d 539 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Chambers Development Securities Litigation
See Bradford-White Corp. v. Ernst & Whinney, 872 F.2d 1153 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 493 U.S. 993 , 110 S.Ct. 542 , 107 L.Ed.2d 539 (1989) (upholding jury finding that auditor who claimed to comply with GAAS but did not was liable under section 10(b)) cited in West *620 inghouse Sec.
cited
Cited "see"
John Czajka v. Paul D. Caspari, Barbara Buescher, Dr. Schoenen
See Bolin v. Black, 875 F.2d 1343, 1347 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 993 , 110 S.Ct. 542 , 107 L.Ed.2d 539 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Munera
See Commonwealth v. Melendez, 407 Mass. 53, 55-56 (1990). 3 See also United States v. White, 890 F.2d 1012, 1014 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 (1990), and United States v. Cross, 928 F.2d 1030 , 1050 n.66 (11th Cir. 1991), cases asserting a distinction between criminal profile evidence and modus operand! evidence. 4 In United States v. Diaz, 878 F. 2d 608, 618 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 493 U.S. 993 (1989), the admission of testimony concerning the characteristics of a narcotics “stash pad” was held proper. 5 Q.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Arthur Montour, A/K/A Kakwirakeron
See United States v. Diaz, 878 F.2d 608, 614-15 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 993 , 110 S.Ct. 543 , 107 L.Ed.2d 540 (1989) (subsequent events may *1027 show relevance of prior conduct to conspiracy).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Raccoon Recovery, LLC v. Navoi Mining and Metallurgical Kombinat
See, e.g., St Clair v. City of Chico, 880 F.2d 199, 201 (9th Cir.) (treating motion raising ripeness issue as motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 993 , 110 S.Ct. 541 , 107 L.Ed.2d 539 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tucker
See also Bolin v. Black, 875 F.2d 1343, 1350 (8th Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 493 U.S. 993 , 110 S.Ct. 542 , 107 L.Ed.2d 539 (1989) (juror’s failure to disclose that her son was on probation in response to voir dire question as to whether jurors’ family members presently incarcerated not juror misconduct).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Medina v. Singletary
An abusive petition occurs where a prisoner files a petition raising grounds that were available but not relied upon in a prior petition, or engages in other conduct that disentitles him to the relief he seeks.” Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298 , 318-19 n. 34, 115 S.Ct. 851 , 863 n. 34, 130 L.Ed.2d 808 (1995) (citations omitted) (quotations omitted); see also Gunn v. Newsome, 881 F.2d 949 , 955 n. 6 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 993 , 110 S.Ct. 542 , 107 L.Ed.2d 540 (1989) (a successive petition raises claims that are identical to claims previously raised and rejected on the merits in a pr…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Xuncax v. Gramajo
See, e.g., Bradford-White Corp. v. Ernst & Whinney, 872 F.2d 1153, 1160-61 (3d Cir.1989) (holding statute of limitations waived despite fact that defendant raised issue in answer because defendant did not further press the defense), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 993 , 110 S.Ct. 542 , 107 L.Ed.2d 539 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Oscar Quiroz
See, e.g., United States v. Diaz, 878 F.2d 608, 614 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 993 , 110 S.Ct. 543 , 107 L.Ed.2d 540 (1989); United States v. Cruz, 797 F.2d 90, 95 (2d Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Elliot Fineman the Industry Network System, Inc. v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(2×)
Orlando, 822 F.2d at 1294; see Levinson v. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 868 F.2d 558, 562 (3d Cir.1989) (the purpose of moving for a directed verdict before judgment notwithstanding the verdict is to afford the opposing party an opportunity to cure defects in its proofs prior to submission of the case to the jury); see also Bradford-White Corp. v. Ernst & Whinney, 872 F.2d 1153, 1161 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 993 , 110 S.Ct. 542 , 107 L.Ed.2d 539 (1989). 40 TINS does not suggest that Armstrong failed to request a directed verdict timely; indeed the record reflects that Armstrong orally moved f…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
St. Clair
v.
City of Chico, California
v.
City of Chico, California
No. 89-600.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 4, 1989.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: D. Rhode Island (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.