green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles David Gipp
See United States v. Keene, 915 F.2d 1164, 1168 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1102 , 111 S.Ct. 1001 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1991); United States v. Malin, 908 F.2d 163, 168 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 991 , 111 S.Ct. 534 , 112 L.Ed.2d 544 (1990); United States v. Henry, 878 F.2d 937, 944 (6th Cir.1989); United States v. Robinson, 857 F.2d 1006, 1010 (5th Cir.1988); United States v. Matra, 841 F.2d 837, 842 (8th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Gipp
See United States v. Keene, 915 F.2d 1164, 1168 (8th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1102 (1991); United States v. Malin, 908 F.2d 163, 168 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 991 (1990); United States v. Henry, 878 F.2d 937, 944 (6th Cir. 1989); United States v. Robinson, 857 F.2d 1006, 1010 (5th Cir. 1988); United States v. Matra, 841 F.2d 837, 842 (8th Cir. 1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Stevens
(2×)
See United States v. Keene, 915 F.2d 1164, 1168-69 (8th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1102 (1991); Henson v. State, 204 A.2d 516, 519 (Md. 1964); State v. Meyer, 311 N.W.2d 520, 522-24 (Neb. 1981); State v. Johnson, 230 A.2d 831, 836-37 (R.I. 1967); see also Garcia, The Knock And Announce Rule: A New Approach To the Destruction-Of-Evidence Exception, 93 Colum.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Illinois v. Condon
See, e. g., United States v. Keene, 915 F. 2d 1164, 1168-1169 (CA8 1990) (fact that narcotics on premises could have been quickly destroyed justified unannounced entry), cert. denied, 498 U. S. 1102 (1991); State v. Matos, 135 N. H. 410, 411, 605 A. 2d 223, 224 (1992) (same); State v. Williams,, 168 Wis. 2d 970, 985-986 , 485 N. W. 2d 42, 48 (1992) (combined presence of drugs and guns on premises justified unna-nounced entry).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Illinois v. Condon
See, e. g., United States v. Keene, 915 F. 2d 1164, 1168-1169 (CA8 1990) (fact that narcotics on premises could have been quickly destroyed justified unannounced entry), cert. denied, 498 U. S. 1102 (1991); State v. Matos, 135 N. H. 410, 411, 605 A. 2d 223, 224 (1992) (same); State v. Williams,, 168 Wis. 2d 970, 985-986 , 485 N. W. 2d 42, 48 (1992) (combined presence of drugs and guns on premises justified unna-nounced entry).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Asbury
v.
Wisconsin
v.
Wisconsin
No. 90-6589.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 1991.
Published
Ct. App. Wis. Certio-rari denied.