Robinson v. United States, 498 U.S. 857 (1990). · Go Syfert
Search
Robinson v. United States, 498 U.S. 857 (1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
50 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Flora Alicia Ocana (ca5, 2000-03-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Flora Alicia Ocana (2×)
5th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Rodriguez, 897 F.2d 1324, 1325 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 857 , 111 S.Ct. 158 , 112 L.Ed.2d 124 (1990).
cited Cited "see" Seeley v. State
Wash. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Burton, 894 F.2d 188 (6th Cir.), cert denied, 498 U.S. 857 (1990); National Org.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. George Dean, James Earl Cofer, Kenneth Dewayne Smith, and Kenneth Earl Flowers
5th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.8 (providing that defendant may be held accountable at sentencing for reasonably foreseeable conduct of others in furtherance of the jointly undertaken criminal activity). ‘When a defendant objects to particular findings in the presentence report, the sentencing court must resolve the specifically disputed issues of fact if intends to use those facts as a basis for its sentence.” United States v. Smith, 13 F.3d 860, 867 (5th Cir.) (citing United States v. Rodriguez, 897 F.2d 1324, 1327 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 857 , 111 S.Ct. 158 , 112 L.Ed.2d 124 (1990)), cer…
cited Cited "see" United States v. Gadison
5th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1, Application note 3; see United States v. Rodriguez, 897 F.2d 1324, 1325-26 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 857 , 111 S.Ct. 158 , 112 L.Ed.2d 124 (1990).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Harold M. Newcomb
6th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
Instead, as discussed more fully in section III.B.(l), supra, the rationale for allowing the defense is that there are times .when “the public interest requires the selection of the lesser of two evils.” Bailey, 585 F.2d at 1111 ; see United States v. Burton, 894 F.2d 188, 191 (6th Cir.). cert. denied, 498 U.S. 857 , 111 S.Ct. 157 , 112 L.Ed.2d 123 (1990).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. John A. Rapanos (2×)
6th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. at 182 , 104 S.Ct. at 1743 ; see also United States v. Burton, 894 F.2d 188, 190 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 857 , 111 S.Ct. 157 , 112 L.Ed.2d 123 (1990).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Landgraf
N.M. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Dechaine, 572 A.2d 130, 136 (Me.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 857 , 111 S.Ct. 156 , 112 L.Ed.2d 122 (1990).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Valencia
5th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, United States v. Rodriguez, 897 F.2d 1324, 1326 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 857 , 111 S.Ct. 158 , 112 L.Ed.2d 124 (1990) ("While any information with `sufficient indicia of reliability to support its probable accuracy' may be considered in making the sentencing fnctfindings, .. there must be `an acceptable evidential basis' for the court's factfindings at the sentencing hearing." (citations omitted)).
Robinson
v.
United States
No. 90-5005.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1990.
498 U.S. 857
Published

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.