green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Josefina Cantellops v. Juan Alvaro-Chapel C.H.R. Corporation, Flamingo Road Inc.
See Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., 862 F.2d 910, 918 (1st Cir.1988) (“It is well settled that a litigant who accedes to the form of a special interrogatory will not be heard to complain after the fact.”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 891 , 111 S.Ct. 233 , 112 L.Ed.2d 193 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, a Corporation v. Concrete Holding Company, Formerly Known as St. Charles Quarry Company, Doing Business as Defiance Quarry, Doing Business as Kurtz Concrete, Inc., Doing Business as Goellner Redi-Mix, Inc., a Corporation St. Charles County Sanitary Landfill, Inc., an Administratively-Dissolved Corporation Quarry Holding Company, a Voluntarily-Dissolved Corporation v. John J. Barnes, Jr. Quarry Holding Company, Third Party John J. Barnes, Jr. Quarry Holding Company James P. Davis Quarry Development Company Community Title Company, Cross Concrete Holding Company, Third Party v. James P. Davis, Individually, and as Statutory and Common Law Trustee for Quarry Holding Company Quarry Development Company Community Title Company, Third Party
See Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co., 900 F.2d 388, 397 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 891 , 111 S.Ct. 233 , 112 L.Ed.2d 193 (1990); see also United States v. Simmons, 964 F.2d 763, 777 (8th Cir.) ("As a general rule, an appellate court may review only the issues specifically raised and argued in an appellant's brief."), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 , 113 S.Ct. 632 , 121 L.Ed.2d 563 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Concrete Holding Co.
See Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co., 900 F.2d 388, 397 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 891 , 111 S.Ct. 233 , 112 L.Ed.2d 193 (1990); see also United States v. Simmons, 964 F.2d 763, 777 (8th Cir.) (“As a general rule, an appellate court may review only the issues specifically raised and argued in an appellant’s brief.”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 , 113 S.Ct. 632 , 121 L.Ed.2d 563 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Concrete Holding Co. v. James P. Davis
See Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co., 900 F.2d 388, 397 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 891 (1990); see also United States v. Simmons, 964 F.2d 763, 777 (8th Cir.) ("As a general rule, an appellate court may review only the issues specifically raised and argued in an appellant's brief."), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1011 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Soares v. Brockton Credit
See Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co., 900 F.2d 388 , 394 ___ ________ __________________ 18 (1st Cir.) (equating abuse of discretion with a meaningful error in judgment), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 891 (1990). _____ ______ Contrary to BCU's importunings, it is the creditor's knowledge, not the state court's nescience, that is relevant to the question at hand.
discussed
Cited "see"
Soares v. Brockton Credit Union
See Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co., 900 F.2d 388, 394 (1st Cir.) (equating abuse of discretion with a meaningful error in judgment), cert, denied, 498 U.S. 891 , 111 S.Ct. 233 , 112 L.Ed.2d 193 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Silva v. Witschen
See Navarro-Ayala v. Nunez, 968 F.2d 1421, 1425 (1st Cir. 1992). ___ _____________ _____ An abuse of discretion occurs only if "'a material factor deserv- ing significant weight is ignored, . . . an improper factor is relied upon, or . . . all proper and no improper factors are assessed, but the court makes a serious mistake in weighing them.'" Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co., 900 F.2d 388, 394 (1st ________ __________________ Cir.) (quoting Fashion House, Inc. v. K Mart Corp., 892 F.2d ____________________ _____________ 1076, 1081 (1st Cir. 1989)), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 891 (1990). ____ _____…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McMillan v. Rodriguez-Negron
See also, Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co., 900 F.2d 388, 394 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 891 , 111 S. Ct. 233 , 112 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Plymouth Ret. Bd. v. Contributory Ret. Appeal Bd.
See also Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co. , 900 F.2d 388 , 395 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 891 (1990) (judges should "take pains neither to use an elephant gun to slay a mouse nor to wield a cardboard sword if a dragon looms").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Keene v. Brigham & Women's Hospital, Inc.
See also Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co., 900 F.2d 388, 395 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 498 U.S. 891 (1990) (judges should “take pains neither to use an elephant gun to slay a mouse nor to wield a cardboard sword if a dragon looms”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anderson
v.
Beatrice Foods Co.
v.
Beatrice Foods Co.
No. 90-198.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1990.
498 U.S. 891
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Motions of Harvard Law School Environmental Law Society et al. and American College of Real Estate Lawyers for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.