Bravo v. United States, 498 U.S. 949 (1990). · Go Syfert
Search
Bravo v. United States, 498 U.S. 949 (1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Commonwealth v. Montione (pa, 1998-11-24)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Montione (2×)
Pa. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Dawn, 900 F.2d 1132 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 949 , 111 S.Ct. 368 , 112 L.Ed.2d 330 (1990).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Harris
Conn. App. Ct. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Dawn, 900 F.2d 1132, 1136 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 949 , 111 S. Ct. 368 , 112 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Schmidt
Haw. App. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Dawn, 900 F.2d 1132 (Wis.), reh'g denied, cert. denied, 498 U.S. 949 , 111 S.Ct. 368 , 112 L.Ed.2d 330 (1990). 4 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Rafael Alvarez Pena
8th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Dyer, 910 F.2d 530, 533 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 907 , 111 S.Ct. 276 , 112 L.Ed.2d 232 (1990), and 498 U.S. 949 (1990).
cited Cited "see" United States v. King
E.D. Va. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Dawn, 900 F.2d 1132, 1135-36 (7th Cir.) (and cases cited therein), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 949 , 111 S.Ct. 368 , 112 L.Ed.2d 330 (1990).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Lawrence A. Saffeels
8th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Dawn, 900 F.2d 1132, 1135-36 (7th Cir.) (and cases cited therein), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 949 , 111 S.Ct. 368 , 112 L.Ed.2d 330 (1990).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re State Police Litigation
D. Conn. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
Although the doctrine of qualified immunity does not require a defendant “to anticipate subsequent legal developments,” Harlow, 457 U.S. at 818 , 102 S.Ct. at 2738 , the requirement that a right be “clearly established” does not mean that “the very action in question has previously been held unlawful.” Anderson, 483 U.S. at 640 , 107 S.Ct. at 3039 ; see also Cleveland-Perdue v. Brutsche, 881 F.2d 427, 431 (7th Cir.1989) (“The presence of a controlling precedent is not ... a sine qua non of a finding that a particular right has been clearly established____”), cer t. denied, 498 …
Bravo
v.
United States
No. 90-5768.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 29, 1990.
498 U.S. 949
Published

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.