green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.3 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“the cause of action accrues when the claimant has a reasonable opportunity to discover the violation, not when [it] discovers the true identity of the violator or all of the violators”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
"Transwestern"
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Guillot-Vogt Associates, Inc. v. Holly & Smith
But see Kern River Gas Transmission v. Coastal Corp., 899 F.2d 1458, 1464 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 952 , 111 S.Ct. 374 , 112 L.Ed.2d 336 (1990) (copyright on map indicating proposed corridor of gas pipeline denied because idea of gas pipeline corridor could not be expressed in any other meaningful way and copyright would therefore allow monopoly on idea).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Directv, Inc. v. Rodkey
the cause of action accrues when the claimant has a reasonable opportunity to discover the violation, not when discovers the true identity of the violator or all of the violators
discussed
Cited "see"
Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Transwestern Pipeline Co. v. FERC, 897 F.2d 570 , 579-81 (D.C.Cir.) (where Commission did not apply filed-rate doctrine to bar pipeline’s collection of certain balances from customers because they had adequate notice, rejecting Commission’s argument that preamble to regulations suggested policy of assuring pipelines’ recovery of all purchased gas costs because such “notice” was inadequate and rebuffing Commission’s contention that two FERC decisions allowed recovery of balances in similar circumstances because these decisions did not involve the pipeline’s particular system),…
cited
Cited "see"
Northwest Pipeline Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Transwestern Pipeline Co. v. F.E.R.C., 897 F.2d 570 , 578-79 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 952 , 111 S.Ct. 373 , 112 L.Ed.2d 335 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Util. L. Rep. P 14,056 Northwest Pipeline Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Cascade Natural Gas Corporation, Northwest Natural Gas Company, Intervenors. Northwest Pipeline Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Transwestern Pipeline Co. v. F.E.R.C., 897 F.2d 570 , 578-79 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 952 , 111 S.Ct. 373 , 112 L.Ed.2d 335 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dennis Kreish v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.
See id. 8 Kreish's claim that the defendant violated Sec. 2511(1)(c) by intentionally disclosing the content of his conversations also fails because he has not met his burden of production under Rule 56(e).
discussed
Cited "see"
BellSouth Advertising & Publishing Corp. v. Donnelley Information Publishing, Inc.
See Kern River Gas Transmission Co. v. Coastal Corp., 899 F.2d 1458, 1463-64 (5th Cir.) (applying merger doctrine where idea of locating pipeline along certain route was inseparable from expression of the route on a topographical map), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 952 , 111 S.Ct. 374 , 112 L.Ed.2d 336 (1990); see also Educational Testing Services v. Katzman, 193 F.2d 533, 539 (3d Cir. 1986); Toro Co. v. R & R Products Co., 787 F.2d 1208, 1212 (8th Cir.1986). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Util. L. Rep. P 13,952 Pacific Gas Transmission Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Associated Gas Distrib. v. FERC, 824 F.2d 981 , 1037 (D.C.Cir.1987) (reservation charge under optional certificate procedures involves risk-sharing with particular customer who arranges for service), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 952 , 111 S.Ct. 373 , 112 L.Ed.2d 335 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Town of Norwood, Massachusetts v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, New England Power Company, Intervenor
The analogy offered was to automatic rate adjustment clauses which, “[o]nce the rate schedule is approved, [permit] rate adjustments [to] be made in accordance with the internally-prescribed automatic adjustment clause without further notice to action by the Commission.” Id. at 896 (citing 16 U.S.C. § 824d(f)); see also Transwestem Pipeline v. FERC, 897 F.2d 570 , 578 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 952 , 111 S.Ct. 373 , 112 L.Ed.2d 335 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James C. Robinson v. National Transportation Safety Board
See also Clarke v. United States, 915 F.2d 699, 701 (D.C.Cir.1990) (en banc) (quoting Transwestern Pipeline Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Comm’n, 897 F.2d 570 , 575 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 952 , 111 S.Ct. 373 , 112 L.Ed.2d 335 (1990)); City of New York v. Baker, 878 F.2d 507, 509-10 (D.C.Cir.1989); Westmoreland v. National Transp.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Transwestern Pipeline Co.
v.
Kansas Power & Light Co. and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Public Utilities Commission of California
v.
Kansas Power & Light Co. and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Public Utilities Commission of California
No. 90-344; No. 90-367.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 29, 1990.
498 U.S. 952
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (1) · W.D. Pennsylvania (1)
C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of Interstate Natural Gas Association of America for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Cer-tiorari denied. Reported below: 283 U. S. App. D. C. 116, 897 F. 2d 570.