Repub. Party of Oregon v. Keisling, 503 U.S. 970 (1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Repub. Party of Oregon v. Keisling, 503 U.S. 970 (1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Teper v. Miller (ca11, 1996-04-24) · Strongest negative: Gergans v. Brown (ilnd, 1995-09-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "but see" Gergans v. Brown
N.D. Ill. · 1995 · signal: but see · confidence high
To be sure, in this circuit the degree of deference given to the agency in this latter inquiry is greater for “those statements of legislative intent that the agency embodies in formal regulations,” than it is for “those *312 more informal statements that do not necessarily reflect the deliberate focus of the entire agency on the issue of congressional intent.” Pennington v. Didrickson, 22 F.3d 1376, 1383 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 613 , 130 L.Ed.2d 522 (1994); but see Wagner Seed Co. v. Bush, 946 F.2d 918, 922 (D.C.Cir.1991) (“In any event, it simply is not the …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Teper v. Miller (2×)
11th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Wagner Seed Co. v. Bush, 946 F.2d 918, 921-22 (D.C.Cir.1991) (in the course of concluding that EPA interpretation issued via decision letter entitled to deference, noting that interpretation was given “in order to resolve an important and recurring matter before it,” and that "agency has applied this interpretation consistently”), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 970 , 112 S.Ct. 1584 , 118 L.Ed.2d 304 (1992). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Teper v. Miller
11th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Wagner Seed Co. v. Bush, 946 F.2d 918, 921-22 (D.C.Cir.1991) (in the course of concluding that EPA interpretation issued via decision letter entitled to deference, noting that interpretation was given "in order to resolve an important and recurring matter before it," and that "agency has applied this interpretation consistently"), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 970 , 112 S.Ct. 1584 , 118 L.Ed.2d 304 (1992) 11 The Chevron Court articulated this rationale in passages such as this: Judges are not experts in the field, and are not part of either political branch of the Government....
Republican Party of Oregon
v.
Keisling, Secretary of State of Oregon
No. 91-1566.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 6, 1992.
503 U.S. 970
Published

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioners to expedite consideration^ of petition for writ of certiorari denied.