green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.0 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Aiken
... evidence of those acts is relevant to the rico charges against each defendant, and the claim that separate trials would eliminate the so-called spillover prejudice is at least overstated if not entirely meritless
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Gigante
the alleged complexity stem more from the abundance of evidence than from the subtlety of the analysis needed to consider it
discussed
Cited "see"
Banks v. Lappin
See Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 159, 166 , 105 S.Ct. 3099 , 87 L.Ed.2d 114 (1985) (an official-capacity lawsuit is in effect against the sovereign); accord Mason v. Judges of U.S. Court of Appeals for District of Columbia Circuit in Regular Active Service Acting in Their Official Capacities, 952 F.2d 423, 425 (D.C.Cir.1991) (recognizing that a suit against federal officials challenging their official actions is a suit against the United States under 28 U.S.C. § 2401 (a)), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 829 , 113 S.Ct. 92 , 121 L.Ed.2d 54 (1992). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Walton v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
See Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 159, 166 , 105 S.Ct. 3099 , 87 L.Ed.2d 114 (1985) (an official-capacity lawsuit is in effect against the sovereign); accord Mason v. Judges of U.S. Court of Appeals for District of Columbia Circuit in Regular Active Service Acting in Their Official Capacities, 952 F.2d 423, 425 (D.C.Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 829 , 113 S.Ct. 92 , 121 L.Ed.2d 54 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Boulware v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
See Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 159, 166 , 105 S.Ct. 3099 , 87 L.Ed.2d 114 (1985) (an official-capacity lawsuit is in effect against the sovereign); accord Mason v. Judges of U.S. Court of Appeals for Dist. of Columbia Circuit in Regular Active Service Acting in Their Official Capacities, 952 F.2d 423, 425 (D.C.Cir.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 829 , 113 S.Ct. 92 , 121 L.Ed.2d 54 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alaska Legislative Council v. Babbitt
See Mason v. Judges of the United States Court of Appeals, 952 F.2d 423, 425 (D.C.Cir.1991) (statute of limitations under § 2401 begins to run when the “right of action,” determined by reference to the “gravamen of the complaint,” “first accrued”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 829 , 113 S.Ct. 92 , 121 L.Ed.2d 54 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Testa v. United States
See United States v. DiNome, 954 F.2d 839, 846 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 830 , 113 S.Ct. 94 , 95, 121 L.Ed.2d 56 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tokars
See United States v. DiNome, 954 F.2d 839, 846 (2d Cir.) (statements about victims’ existing and ongoing suspicions concerning defendant’s exporta-turn business relevant to show motive to kill), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 830 , 113 S.Ct. 94 , 121 L.Ed.2d 56 (1992); United States v. Donley, 878 F.2d 735, 738 (3d Cir.1989) (statements showing that victim intended to move out of militaiy apartment and separate from defendant), ce rt. denied, 494 U.S. 1058 , 110 S.Ct. 1528 , 108 L.Ed.2d 767 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tokars
See United States v. DiNome, 954 F.2d 839 , 846 (2d Cir.) (statements about victims’ existing and ongoing suspicions concerning defendant’s exportation business relevant to show motive to kill), cert. denied , 506 U. S. 830 , 113 S. Ct. 94 , 121 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Russell Tellier Teddy J. Moustakis Alphonse Rescigno Ronald Rescigno Richard Lawlor Timothy Burns Michael Ladagana Robert Bugliaro Michael Bugliaro James Hartofilis and Pasquale Curatolo, Also Known as \Patsy
See United States v. DiNome, 954 F.2d 839, 843 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 830 , 113 S.Ct. 94 , 95, 121 L.Ed.2d 56 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Tellier
See United States v. DiNome, 954 F.2d 839, 843 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 830 , 113 S.Ct. 94 , 95, 121 L.Ed.2d 56 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Aziz Muthana
In Beck , we interpreted the willfulness requirement of 22 U.S.C. § 2778 (b)(2) as requiring that the prosecutor “show that the defendant was aware of a legal duty not to export the [defense] articles.” Beck, 615 F.2d at 451 ; accord, e.g., United States v. Tsai 954 F.2d 155, 162 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 93 , 121 L.Ed.2d 54 (1992); United States v. Murphy, 852 F.2d 1, 7 (1st Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 489 U.S. 1022 , 109 S.Ct. 1145 , 103 L.Ed.2d 205 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gates
Appellant acknowledges that the answer inevitably is adverse to him under our decision in United States v. Henderson, 34 MJ 174 (CMA 1992); accord United States v. Fagg, 34 MJ 179 (CMA), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 92 , 121 L.Ed.2d 54 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph
See United States v. Henderson, 34 MJ 174 (CMA 1992); accord United States v. Fagg, 34 MJ 179 (CMA), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 92 , 121 L.Ed.2d 54 (1992). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Young v. United Automobile
Workers v. Foust, 442 U.S. 42, 51 (1979), and in accordance with this deference, “mere negligence . . . [will] not state a claim for breach of the duty of fair representation,” United Steelworkers v. Rawson, 495 U.S. 362, 372-73 (1990); see also Le’Mon v. NLRB, 952 F.2d 1203, 1205 (10th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 830 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Larry Young v. United Automobile Workers-Labor Employment and Training Corp.
Workers v. Foust, 442 U.S. 42, 51 , 99 S.Ct. 2121, 2127 , 60 L.Ed.2d 698 (1979), and in accordance with this deference, “mere negligence ... [will] not state a claim for breach of the duty of fair representation,” United Steelworkers v. Rawson, 495 U.S. 362, 372-73 , 110 S.Ct. 1904, 1911-12 , 109 L.Ed.2d 362 (1990); see also Le’Mon v. NLRB, 952 F.2d 1203, 1205 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 830 , 113 S.Ct. 93 , 121 L.Ed.2d 55 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Joseph Carr, Jr., in No. 93-1376. United States of America v. Walter Orlando Cardona-Usquiano, in No. 93-1383
(2×)
First, he contends that his role in his “relevant conduct” was minor as defined in U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. “[A] minor participant means any participant who is less culpable than most other participants, but whose role could not be described as minimal.” U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2, comment, (n. 3); see also United States v. Tsai, 954 F.2d 155, 166-67 (3d Cir.) (discussing definition of “minor participant”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 93 , 121 L.Ed.2d 54 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Morgan
v.
Aispuro, Superintendent, California State Prison at Corcoran
v.
Aispuro, Superintendent, California State Prison at Corcoran
No. 91-2046.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1992.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. Florida (1) · S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.