green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Racca v. EFG General Partner Corp.
“Courts will, however, typically look beyond the face of the complaint to determine whether removal is proper.” Frank, 128 F.3d at 922 (citing Villarreal v. Brown Express, Inc., 6 529 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1976)); see Aquafaith Shipping, Ltd. v. Jarillas, 963 F.2d 806, 808 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 955 (1992); Rivera v. Orion Marine Grp.
cited
Cited "see"
Byrd v. Hunt
See Goldstar (Panama) S.A. v. United States, 967 F.2d 965, 967 (4th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 955 , 113 S.Ct. 411 , 121 L.Ed.2d 335 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jamal v. Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance
“Courts will, however, typically look beyond the face of the complaint to determine whether removal is proper.” Frank, 128 F.3d at 922 *803 (citing Villarreal v. Brown Express, Inc., 529 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir.1976)); see Aquafaith Shipping, Ltd. v. Jarillas, 963 F.2d 806, 808 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 955 , 113 S.Ct. 413 , 121 L.Ed.2d 337 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Suzanne B. Zielinski v. United States
See Goldstar (Panama) S.A. v. United States, 967 F.2d 965, 970 (4th Cir.) (discretionary function exception applies to government's decision regarding security measures necessary to protect Panamanian businesses in wake of U.S. occupation), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 955 (1992); Attallah v. United States, 955 F.2d 776, 785-86 (1st Cir.1992) (exception applies to Customs Service policy and procedures for providing security to passengers); Haygan v. United States, 627 F.Supp. 749, 750-51 (D.D.C.1986) (exception applies to security precautions at a parking lot); Marbley v. United States, 620 F.Supp. …
discussed
Cited "see"
Zielinski v. United States
See Goldstar (Pan- ama) S.A. v. United States, 967 F.2d 965 , 970 (4th Cir.) (discretionary function exception applies to government's decision regarding secur- ity measures necessary to protect Panamanian businesses in wake of U.S. occupation), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 955 (1992); Attallah v. United States, 955 F.2d 776, 785-86 (1st Cir. 1992) (exception applies to Customs Service policy and procedures for providing security to passengers); Haygan v. United States, 627 F. Supp. 749, 750-51 (D.D.C. 1986) (exception applies to security precautions at a parking lot); Marbley v. United States, 620 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wade v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp.
In Kidder the Alabama Supreme Court recognized that Kidder could maintain an action alleging fraud in the inducement of her employment based upon alleged misrepresentations as to her working conditions. 639 So.2d at 1363 ; see also Forbus v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 958 F.2d 1036, 1042 (11th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 955 , 113 S.Ct. 412 , 121 L.Ed.2d 336 ; see also Shaddix v. United Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gary Raczak v. Ameritech Corporation
Compare O'Shea v. Commercial Credit Corp., 930 F.2d 358 (4th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 859 , 112 S.Ct. 177 , 116 L.Ed.2d 139 (1991), and Wittorf v. Shell Oil Co., 37 F.3d 1151 (5th Cir.1994), with Forbus v. Sears Roebuck & Company, 958 F.2d 1036 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 955 , 113 S.Ct. 412 , 121 L.Ed.2d 336 (1992), and Oberg v. Allied Van Lines, Inc., 11 F.3d 679 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1108 , 114 S.Ct. 2104 , 128 L.Ed.2d 665 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Raczak v. Ameritech Corp.
Compare O’Shea v. Commercial Credit Corp., 930 F.2d 358 (4th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 859 , 112 S.Ct. 177 , 116 L.Ed.2d 139 (1991), and Wittorf v. Shell Oil Co., 37 F.3d 1151 (5th Cir.1994), with Forbus v. Sears Roebuck & Company, 958 F.2d 1036 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 955 , 113 S.Ct. 412 , 121 L.Ed.2d 336 (1992), and Oberg v. Allied Van Lines, Inc., 11 F.3d 679 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2104 , 128 L.Ed.2d 665 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shaddix v. United Ins. Co. of America
See also Forbus v. Sears Roebuck Co. , 958 F.2d 1036 , 1042-43 (11th Cir. 1992), cert. denied , 506 U.S. 955 , 113 S.Ct. 412 , 121 L.Ed.2d 336 (1993), in which the Eleventh Circuit held that Alabama law would allow employees-at-will who had retired early from their jobs, but who had not been fired, to maintain an action against their employer for fraudulent misrepresentations and suppression of material facts. *Page 1100 United interprets Alabama law to provide that an employee-at-will cannot maintain any action alleging fraud or misrepresentation against his or her employer.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Goldstar (Panama), S. A.
v.
United States and Mauricio Deportes, S. A. v. United States
v.
United States and Mauricio Deportes, S. A. v. United States
No. 92-425.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 2, 1992.
506 U.S. 955
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 967 F. 2d 965 (first case).