green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.1 score
“he party to be , estopped must have convinced the first court to adopt its position; a litigant is not forever bound to a losing argument.”
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Photopaint Technologies, LLC v. Smartlens Corp.
he party to be , estopped must have convinced the first court to adopt its position; a litigant is not forever bound to a losing argument.
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles McNelton v. William Gittere (DEATH PENALTY)
See United States v. Lopez–Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583 , 595– 96 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 989 , 113 S.Ct. 504 , 121 L.Ed.2d 440 (1992) 20 (prosecutor may comment on defense's failure to present exculpatory evidence, as long as that comment is not phrased to call attention to defendant's failure to 21 testify).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Williams
See United States v. Spears, 965 F.2d 262, 277 (7th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 989 , 113 S.Ct. 502 , 121 L.Ed.2d 438 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Krause (In Re Krause)
See Levinson v. United States, 969 F.2d 260 (7th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 989 , 113 S.Ct. 505 , 121 L.Ed.2d 441 (1992); In re Carey, 326 B.R. 816 (Bankr.E.D.Cal.2005). 122 .
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. DiGiambattista
See United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 592 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 989 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Desmond Christian
See Levinson v. United States, 969 F.2d 260, 265 (7th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 989 , 113 S.Ct. 505 , 121 L.Ed.2d 441 (1992) (government’s position not inconsistent when government agreed not to seek fraud penalties in prior case while claiming fraud in current case because declining to seek penalty is not an admission that no fraud occurred).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Christian, Desmond
See Levinson v. United States, 969 F.2d 260, 265 (7th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 989 (1992) (government’s position not inconsistent when government agreed not to seek fraud penalties in prior case while claiming fraud in current case because declining to seek penalty is not an admission that no fraud occurred).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charell v. Gonzalez (In Re Gonzalez)
Accord Levinson v. United States, 969 F.2d 260 (7th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 989 , 113 S.Ct. 505 , 121 L.Ed.2d 441 (1992); In re Massey, 228 B.R. 686, 690 (Bankr.S.D.Ind.1998); cf. RTC v. McKendry (In re McKendry), 40 F.3d 331 (10th Cir.1994) (circuit court reversing bankruptcy court’s dismissal of dischargeability proceeding as barred by state statute of limitations for fraud and concluding that federal 60-day statute of limitations controlled under rationale of Brown v. Felsen).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fokkena v. Tripp (In Re Tripp)
See Levinson v. United States, 969 F.2d 260, 265 (7th Cir.) (fading to declare embezzled funds constituted tax evasion, resulting in nondischargeable debt), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 989 , 113 S.Ct. 505 , 121 L.Ed.2d 441 (1992); United States v. Edwards, 777 F.2d 644, 651 (11th Cir.1985) (understating income by not disclosing receipts from distribution of marijuana supports conviction for tax evasion and filing false returns), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1123 , 106 S.Ct. 1644 , 1645, 90 L.Ed.2d 189 (1986); Capone v. United States, 51 F.2d 609, 612 (7th Cir.) (finding false statements on returns where…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Ward
(2×)
See United States v. Spears, 965 F.2d 262, 270 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 989 , 113 S.Ct. 502 , 121 L.Ed.2d 438 (1992); United States v. Sleet, 54 F.3d 303, 306 (7th Cir.1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frierson v. Calderon
An evidentiary ruling constitutes a due process violation if “[t]he excluded testimony was highly relevant to a critical issue in the punishment phase of the trial, and substantial reasons existed to assume its reliability.” Green, 442 U.S. at 97 , 99 S.Ct. at 2151 (internal citations omitted) (emphasis added); accord United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 588 (9th Cir.1992) (exclusion of evidence pursuant to the valid application of the hearsay rules may violate due process if the evidence excluded is “sufficiently reliable and crucial to the defense”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 9…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sayetsitty
See United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 598 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 989 , 113 S.Ct. 504 , 121 L.Ed.2d 440 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
46 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 760, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1477, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2213 United States of America v. Larry Sayetsitty, United States of America v. Joe Sayetsitty
See United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 598 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 989 , 113 S.Ct. 504 , 121 L.Ed.2d 440 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Samuel Philip Manqueros
See United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 597 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 989 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Herman Phillip Sheets, Jr.
See United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 588 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 989 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
McNelton v. State
See United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 595-96 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 989 , 113 S. Ct. 504 (1992) (prosecutor may comment on defense’s failure to present exculpatory evidence, as long as that comment is not phrased to call attention to defend ant’s failure to testify).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Dow
See, e.g., United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 989 , 113 S.Ct. 504 , 121 L.Ed.2d 440 (1992). *1281 ¶ 13 Here, the Court of Appeals engaged in similar analysis, recognizing that the corroboration requirement of the rule is rooted in traditional notions of justice and has become a settled principle of the administration of criminal justice and concluding that the Washington corpus delicti rule and its federal counterpart were not constitutionally mandated.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Dow
See, e.g., United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 989 (1992). ¶13 Here, the Court of Appeals engaged in similar analysis, recognizing that the corroboration requirement of the rule is rooted in traditional notions of justice and has become a settled principle of the administration of criminal justice and concluding that the Washington corpus delicti rule and its federal counterpart were not constitutionally mandated.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Dow
Corbett, 106 Wash.2d at 576 , 723 P.2d 1135 (emphasis added); see also C.D.W., 76 Wash.App. at 763 , 887 P.2d 911 . ¶ 13 Although these cases support the State's assertion that Washington's version of the corpus delicti rule is not a constitutional standard, they do not address whether the federal version of the corpus delicti rule is a constitutional standard. [7] To determine that issue, we must examine whether the corroboration rule discussed in Opper v. United States, 348 U.S. 84 , 75 S.Ct. 158 , 99 L.Ed. 101 (1954), United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583 , cert. denied, 506 U.S. 98…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Schlesinger v. United States (In Re Schlesinger)
See, e.g., Levinson v. United States, 969 F.2d 260, 263 (7th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 989 , 113 S.Ct. 505 , 121 L.Ed.2d 441 (1992); In re Fernandez, 112 B.R. 888, 891 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio 1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Perry
United States v. Gines, 964 F.2d 972, 978 (10th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1069 (1993); see also United States v. Spears, 965 F.2d 262, 281 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 989 (1993); Romolo, 937 F.2d at 23 ; Gonzales, 927 F.2d at 145 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Spears
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 92-6119.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 16, 1992.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.