green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 10×
7.7 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Resource Recycling Corp. v. United States
n establishing predicate jurisdictional facts, a court is not restricted to the face of the pleadings, but may review evidence extrinsic to the pleadings, including affidavits' and deposition testimony
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
First Annapolis Bancorp, Inc. v. United States
in establishing predicate jurisdictional facts, a court is not restricted to the face of the pleadings, but may review evidence extrinsic to the pleadings, including affidavits and deposition testimony.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Sierra Pacific Resources & Subsidiaries v. United States
in establishing predicate jurisdictional facts, a court is not restricted to the face of the pleadings, but may review evidence extrinsic to the pleadings, including affidavits and deposition testimony.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Scarseth v. United States
in establishing predicate jurisdictional facts, a court is not restricted to the face of the pleadings, but may review evidence extrinsic to the pleadings, including affidavits and deposition testimony.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Frymire v. United States
in establishing predicate jurisdictional facts, a court is not restricted to the face of the pleadings, but may-review evidence extrinsic to the pleadings, including affidavits and deposition testimony.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Spodek v. United States
in establishing predicate jurisdictional facts, a court is not restricted to the face of the pleadings, but may review evidence extrinsic to the pleadings, including affidavits and deposition testimony.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Heim v. United States
in establishing predicate jurisdictional facts, a court is not restricted to the face of the pleadings, but may review evidence extrinsic to the pleadings, including affidavits and deposition testimony.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Doninger Metal Products, Corp. v. United States
in establishing predicate jurisdictional facts, a court is not restricted to the face of the pleadings, but may review evidence extrinsic to the pleadings, including affidavits and deposition testimony.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Golding v. United States
in establishing predicate jurisdictional facts, a court is not restricted to the face of the pleadings, but may review evidence extrinsic to the pleadings, including affidavits and deposition testimony.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hannon v. United States
in establishing predicate jurisdictional facts, a court is not restricted to the face of the pleadings, but may review evidence extrinsic to the pleadings, including affidavits and deposition testimony.
cited
Cited "see"
Air Liquide America Corp. v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
See United Texas Transmission Co. (UTTCO) v. United States Army Corps of Eng’eers, 7 F.3d 436 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1235 , 114 S.Ct. 2738 , 129 L.Ed.2d 859 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Heard v. Johnson
Accord Cedars-Sinai Medical Ctr. v. Watkins, 11 F.3d 1573 (Fed.Cir.1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1235 , 114 S.Ct. 2738 , 129 L.Ed.2d 859 (1994); Thornhill Publishing Co. v. General Tel. & Electronics Corp., 594 F.2d 730 , 733 (9th Cir.1979); McLain v. Real Estate Bd., Inc., 583 F.2d 1315 , 1318 n. 1 (5th Cir.1978), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 444 U.S. 232 , 100 S.Ct. 502 , 62 L.Ed.2d 441 (1980); Mortensen v. First Fed.
Alcan Aluminum Corp.
v.
Franchise Tax Board of California
v.
Franchise Tax Board of California
No. 93-813.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 27, 1994.
Published
Citer courts: Federal Claims (10)
Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.