green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
7.3 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Boyd
s a general rule, a cause of action does not accrue under rico until the amount of damages becomes clear and definite.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
McGee v. City of Warrensville Heights
s a general rule, a cause of action 848 does not accrue under rico until the amount of damages becomes clear and definite
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Annette B. Demauro v. Joseph M. Demauro, Edward Martin, Demauro Co., Inc., Nicholas Demauro, Tri-Area Development Co., Inc. And Joan Martin
s a general rule, a cause of action does not accrue under rico until the amount of damages becomes clear and definite.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Krause (In Re Krause)
See Krause v. Commissioner, 99 T.C. 132 , 1992 WL 178601 (1992), aff'd sub. nom., Hildebrand v. Commissioner, 28 F.3d 1024 (10th Cir.1994) cert. denied 513 U.S. 1079 , 115 S.Ct. 727 , 130 L.Ed.2d 631 (1995) for the general background regarding these partnerships and the tax issues.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hawkins v. Walvoord
See First Nationwide Bank v. Gelt Funding Corp., et al., 27 F.3d 763, 769 (2nd Cir.1994) (noting that proximate cause in civil RICO action requires (1) "but-for” causation, also known as cause-in-fact, and (2) legal or proximate cause), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1079 , 115 S.Ct. 728 , 130 L.Ed.2d 632 (1995). 38 .
cited
Cited "see"
Kashelkar v. Rubin & Rothman
See First Nationwide Bank v. Gelt Funding Corp., 820 F.Supp. 89, 98 (S.D.N.Y.1993), aff 'd, 27 F.3d 763 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1079 , 115 S.Ct. 728 , 130 L.Ed.2d 632 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williamson v. Waldman
Id. 588 N.Y.S.2d at 697 ; see Marchica v. Long Island R.R., 31 F.3d 1197 (2d Cir.1994) (holding that plaintiff who was stuck by needle hidden in pile of garbage, could recover under Federal Employers’ Liability Act for emotional distress caused by fear of AIDS without proving actual exposure to HIV and without demonstrating medical probability of later developing disease), cert. denied, sub nom., Long Island R.R. v. Marchica, 513 U.S. 1079 , 115 S.Ct. 727 , 130 L.Ed.2d 631 (1995); Howard v. Alexandria Hosp., 245 Va. 346 , 429 S.E. 2d 22, 24-25 (1993) (permitting patient to recover emotional-…
discussed
Cited "see"
International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Teamsters Local Union 714, Machinery Scrap Iron, Metal & Steel Chauffeurs
All Writs Order, 907 F.2d at 280 (2d Cir.1990); see Ass’n for Retarded Citizens of Conn., Inc. v. Thorne, 30 F.3d 367, 371-73 (2d Cir.1994) (discussing IBT litigation cases), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1079 , 115 S.Ct. 727 , 130 L.Ed.2d 631 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca2 1997
All Writs Order, 907 F.2d at 280 (2d Cir.1990); see Ass'n for Retarded Citizens of Conn., Inc. v. Thorne, 30 F.3d 367 , 371-73 (2d Cir.1994) (discussing IBT litigation cases), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1079 , 115 S.Ct. 727 , 130 L.Ed.2d 631 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Askew v. Trustees of the General Assembly of Church of the Lord Jesus Christ of the Apostolic Faith, Inc.
See, e.g., Poesnecker v. Ricchio, 158 Pa.Cmwlth. 459 , 631 A.2d 1097 (1993), cert. denied 513 U.S. 1079 , 115 S.Ct. 727 , 130 L.Ed.2d 632 (1995) (applying rules of religious fraternal organization to determine whether individuals had been duly elected, and deferring only to actual, valid determinations made by the organizations’ authorities); Shelton, No. 376 C.D.2000 (determining when particular actions were valid church actions and accepting those actions as a factual finding).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Askew v. Trustees of the General Assembly of the Church of the Lord Jesus Christ of the Aposolic Faith, Inc.
See, e.g., Poesnecker v. Ricchio, 158 Pa.Cmwlth. 459 , 631 A.2d 1097 (1993), cert. denied 513 U.S. 1079 , 115 S.Ct. 727 , 130 L.Ed.2d 632 (1995) (applying rules of religious fraternal organization to determine whether individuals had been duly elected, and deferring only to actual, valid determinations made by the organizations’ authorities); Def.’s Mem.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
First Capital Asset Management, Inc. v. Brickellbush, Inc.
See, e.g., First Nationwide Bank v. Gelt Funding Corp., 27 F.3d 763, 768 (2d Cir.1994) (indicating that plaintiff’s RICO claims were not ripe and thus it did not yet have standing under RICO), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1079 , 115 S.Ct. 728 , 130 L.Ed.2d 632 (1995). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Baan Co. Securities Litigation
Compare Caribbean Broadcasting System, Ltd. v. Cable & Wireless P.L.C., 148 F.3d 1080, 1088-1090 (D.C.Cir.1998) and Naartex Consulting Corporation v. Watt, 722 F.2d 779, 787 (D.C.Cir.1983) with El-Fadl v. Central Bank of Jordan, 75 F.3d 668, 675 (D.C.Cir.1996) and Crane v. Carr, 814 F.2d 758 (D.C.Cir.1987) and Edmond v. United States Postal Service, 949 F.2d 415, 424 (D.C.Cir.1991) See also Goodman Holdings v. Rafidain Bank, 26 F.3d 1143, 1147 (D.C.Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1079 , 115 S.Ct. 728 , 130 L.Ed.2d 632 (1995); Foremost-McKesson v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 759 F.Supp. 855 (D.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tsipouras v. W & M PROPERTIES, INC.
See Hecht, 897 F.2d at 24 (finding that claim for lost commissions was too speculative); see also First Nationwide Bank v. Gelt Funding Corp., 27 F.3d 763, 768 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1079 , 115 S.Ct. 728 , 130 L.Ed.2d 632 (1995) (noting that amount of damages to sustain a civil RICO claim must be “clear and definite”); Stochastic Decisions, Inc. v. DiDomenico, 995 F.2d 1158, 1166 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 945 , 114 S.Ct. 385 , 126 L.Ed.2d 334 (1993) (dismissing plaintiff’s RICO claim for lack of standing where amount of plaintiff’s injury was indefinite and unpro…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McCampbell v. KPMG Peat Marwick
See also Goldgar v. Office of Administration, 26 F.3d 32 , 35-36 & n. 3 (5th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1079 , 115 S.Ct. 728 , 130 L.Ed.2d 632 (1995) (warning pro se litigant that he would be subject to monetary and other sanctions if he continued to file baseless complaints); *449 Saunders v.. Bush, 15 F.3d 64, 68 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1207 , 114 S.Ct. 2678 , 129 L.Ed.2d 813 (1994) (district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing monetary sanctions against pro se litigant after prior warning).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hayden v. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison
See Fischel Aff. ¶¶ 24-25; see also First Nationwide Bank, 27 F.3d at 772 (“when the plaintiffs loss coincides with a marketwide phenomenon causing comparable losses to other investors, the prospect that the plaintiffs loss was caused by the fraud decreases.”), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1079 , 115 S.Ct. 728 , 130 L.Ed.2d 632 (1995).
Hildebrand
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 94-741.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1995.
513 U.S. 1079
Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (1) · N.D. Ohio (1)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.