green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.2 score
“tying arrangements that constrain only dealers are not presumptively illegal because they pose little danger to competition, as long as consumers may purchase the two goods separately.”
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Southern Card v Lawson Mardon Label
tying arrangements that constrain only dealers are not presumptively illegal because they pose little danger to competition, as long as consumers may purchase the two goods separately.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Prescott v. Little Six, Inc.
City of Timber Lake v. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, 10 F.3d 554, 559 (8th Cir.1993) (deferring to tribal court's decision that the tribal constitution gave the tribal court personal jurisdiction over non-Indians), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1236 , 114 S.Ct. 2741 , 129 L.Ed.2d 861 (1994); see also Duncan Energy v. Three Affiliated Tribes, 27 F.3d 1294 , 1300 (8th Cir.1994) ("The Tribal Court's determinations of federal law should be reviewed de novo while determinations of Tribal law should be accorded more deference."), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1103 , 115 S.Ct. 779 , 130 L.Ed.2d 673 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Prescott v. Little Six, Inc.
City of Timber Lake v. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, 10 F.3d 554, 559 (8th Cir.1993) (deferring to tribal court’s decision that the tribal constitution gave the tribal court personal jurisdiction over non-Indians), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1236 , 114 S.Ct. 2741 , 129 L.Ed.2d 861 (1994); see also Duncan Energy v. Three Affiliated Tribes, 27 F.3d 1294 , 1300 (8th Cir.1994) (“The Tribal Court’s determinations of federal law should be reviewed de novo while determinations of Tribal law should be accorded more deference”), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1103 , 115 S.Ct. 779 , 130 L.Ed.2d 673 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leonard Prescott v. Little Six, Inc.
City of Timber Lake v. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, 10 F.3d 554, 559 (8th Cir.1998) (deferring to tribal court’s decision that the tribal constitution gave the tribal court personal jurisdiction over non-Indians), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1236 , 114 S.Ct. 2741 , 129 L.Ed.2d 861 *757 (1994); see also Duncan Energy v. Three Affiliated Tribes, 27 F.3d 1294 , 1300 (8th Cir.1994) (“The Tribal Court’s determinations of federal law should be reviewed de novo while determinations of Tribal law should be accorded more deference.”), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1103 , 115 S.Ct. 779 , 130 L.Ed.2d 673 (199…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Home Impressions, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation
See also Gillette Co. v. Department of Treasury, 198 Mich.App. 303 , 497 N.W.2d 595 (1993), appeal denied, 445 Mich. 861 , 519 N.W.2d 156 , cert. den., 513 U.S. 1103 , 115 S.Ct. 779 , 130 L.Ed.2d 673 (1995) (holding that Pub.L. 86-272 was not applicable to its corporate tax because it was not measured by net income although “business income” was a starting point for calculation of the tax base.) In this case, the Director is using the activity of the Home Impressions in New Jersey as a reporting requirement under the Act and not as a means of calculating the amount of the minimum fiat tax …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hilda Garcia v. Akwesasne Housing Authority and John Ransom
(2×)
See, e.g., Duncan Energy Co. v. Three Affiliated Tribes, 27 F.3d 1294 , 1299-1301 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1103 , 115 S.Ct. 779 , 130 L.Edüd 673 (1995); Texaco, Inc. v. Zah, 5 F.3d 1374, 1376 (10th Cir.1993); Burlington Northern R.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alliedsignal, Inc. v. Amcast International Corp.
(2×)
See e.g., Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. ASARCO, Inc., 24 F.3d 1565 , 1576 (9th Cir.1994) (only substantial compliance is necessary for response costs incurred pri- or to 1990), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1103 , 115 S.Ct. 780 , 130 L.Ed.2d 674 (1995); County Line Inv.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Duffy v. Wetzler
The procedural and litigation history of this action is set forth in Duffy v Wetzler ( 148 Misc 2d 459 , mod 174 AD2d 253 , appeal dismissed 79 NY2d 976 , lv dismissed 80 NY2d 890 , cert granted 509 US 917 , on remand 207 AD2d 375 , lv denied 84 NY2d 838 , cert denied 513 US 1103 ; see also, 207 AD2d 378 , cert denied 513 US 1103 ), and will not be restated herein.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca3 1997
Solem, 465 U.S. at 472-474 , 104 S.Ct. at 1167-68 ; see also Duncan Energy Co. v. Three Affiliated Tribes, 27 F.3d 1294 , 1297 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1103 , 115 S.Ct. 779 , 130 L.Ed.2d 673 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Goodrich v. Betkoski
The waste product itself “need not be listed by name — -instead of its constituent components — to fall within the Act.” Murtha I, 958 F.2d at 1201 ; see also Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. ASARCO Inc., 24 F.3d 1565, 1573 (9th Cir.1994) (holding that even if product not specifically listed as hazardous substance, if components include hazardous substances, product is regulated by CERCLA), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 780 , 130 L.Ed.2d 674 (1995); Eagle-Picher Indus. v. EPA, 759 F.2d 922 , 930-31 (D.C.Cir.1985) (rejecting contention that because most mining wastes and fly ash contai…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Goodrich v. Betkoski
(2×)
The waste product itself "need not be listed by name--instead of its constituent components--to fall within the Act." Murtha I, 958 F.2d at 1201 ; see also Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. ASARCO Inc., 24 F.3d 1565, 1573 (9th Cir.1994) (holding that even if product not specifically listed as hazardous substance, if components include hazardous substances, product is regulated by CERCLA), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1103 , 115 S.Ct. 780 , 130 L.Ed.2d 674 (1995); Eagle-Picher Indus. v. EPA, 759 F.2d 922 , 930-31 (D.C.Cir.1985) (rejecting contention that because most mining wastes and fly ash contain some h…
ASARCO Inc.
v.
Louisiana-Pacific Corp.
v.
Louisiana-Pacific Corp.
No. 94-833.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1995.
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Motions of American Petroleum Institute et al. and Alaska Miners Association et al. for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.