green
Positive treatment
11.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 48 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Best
The defendant contends that the photographs of the interior of Octavia’s car are ‘‘inherently prejudicial’’ and, thus, inadmissible ‘‘because of their bloody imagery.’’ This contention misapprehends the proper analysis. ‘‘[P]hotographs [that] have a reasonable tendency to prove or disprove a material fact in issue or shed some light upon some material inquiry are not rendered inad- missible simply because they may be characterized as gruesome.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Epps, supra, 105 Conn. App. 95 ; see State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 277 , 646 A.…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Roman
See State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 227, 228 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994) (no misconduct where juror ‘‘ ‘smiled broadly’ ’’ at victim’s father when verdict was announced), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Santiago
See State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183 , 246–47, 646 A.2d 1318 (1994) (‘‘[p]rior to the adoption of the state constitution in 1818, the common law in Connecticut recognized that the state did not have unlimited authority to inflict punishment for the commission of a crime’’), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Santiago
See State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 249 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Campbell
See State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 215-17 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994) (involvement of psychiatrist and psychologist in diagnosis of defendant and their absence from trial evident to jury), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Michael J.
(2×)
See State v. Ross, [ 230 Conn. 183, 228 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Ross
See State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 225 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Malchik v. Division of Criminal Justice
See State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 191 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Courchesne
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 264 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 138 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Senquiz
General Statutes § 51-1a (b); see State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 195 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Barbarula v. Haniewski, No. Cv 97 0437585 S (Mar. 6, 2002)
CT Page 2816 "`[A] potentially inflammatory photograph may be admitted if the court, in its discretion, determines that the probative value of the photograph outweighs the prejudicial effect it might have on the jury.'" State v. Deleon , supra, 369; see State v. Ross , 230 Conn. 183 , 277 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S.Ct. 1133 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1995) (even gruesome photographs may be admissible if they tend to prove or disprove material fact in issue).
cited
Cited "see"
Ramos v. Town of Vernon
See State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 249-52 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Nguyen
See State v. Ross, [ 230 Conn. 183, 228 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Quinet
“In choosing between two constructions of a statute, one valid and one constitutionally precarious, we will search for an effective and constitutional construction that reasonably accords with the legislature’s underlying intent.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Webb, 238 Conn. 389, 493 , 680 A.2d 147 (1996); accord State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 236 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Mukhtaar
Id., 523-24 ; see State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 227-28 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Johnson
See State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 261-62 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Cobb
See State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 219 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Satchwell
Accordingly, “ ‘[a] potentially inflammatory photograph may be admitted if the court, in its discretion, determines that the probative value of the photograph outweighs the prejudicial effect it might have on the jury.’ ” State v. Deleon, supra, 369 ; see State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 277 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Miller v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 316 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Harris
Ed. 2d 409 (1984); United States v. Cadmus, 614 F. Sup. 367, 370 (S.D.N.Y. 1985).’ State v. Pittman, 209 Conn. 596, 608 , 553 A.2d 155 (1989); accord State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 204 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Tomasko
State v. Pittman, 209 Conn. 596, 608 , 553 A.2d 155 (1989); accord State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 204 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Castillo
See, e.g., State v. Ross , 230 Conn. 183 , 204-205, 646 A.2d 1318 (1994) (although not dispositive, "[a]n officer's [articulated] ... beliefs concerning the potential culpability of the **349 individual being questioned, may be one among many factors that bear upon the assessment [of] whether that individual was in custody" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S.Ct. 1133 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1995), quoting Stansbury v. California , 511 U.S. 318 , 325, 114 S.Ct. 1526 , 128 L.Ed.2d 293 (1994) ; State v. McKenna , 166 N.H. 671 , 683, 103 A.3d 756 (2014) ("accusat…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Peeler
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 246 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Santiago
Jeffries, Justice Lewis F. Powell, Jr. (2001 Ed.) p. 451; see also State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183 , 315–16, 646 A.2d 1318 (1994) (Berdon, J., dissenting in part), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Santiago
Ed. 2d 64 (2012); see also State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183 , 246–47, 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Kokkinakos
See State v. Graham, 56 Conn. App. 507, 510 , 743 A.2d 1158 (2000) (in determining whether change in statutory law applies in criminal cases courts generally apply law in existence on date of offense); see also State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 283 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994) (relying on date of offense in retroactivity analysis of change in statutory law), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Little
See, e.g., State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 246-47 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994) (concluding that although constitution of Connecticut does not contain express prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment, such prohibition can be implied from article first, §§ 8 and 9), cert, denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Valentin
See, e.g., State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 221 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994) (“ ‘proof which leaves you with a strong and abiding conviction that the accused is guilty of the crimes with which he has been charged’ ”), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Brunetti
(2×)
Generally, when we rely solely on the state constitution, we do so when the federal constitution clearly does not afford the relief requested; see, e.g., State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 248 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994) ("[t]he defendant urges us to exercise our independent authority under the state constitution to declare any imposition of the death penalty invalid as cruel and inhuman punishment because it no longer comports with contemporary standards of decency and civilization"), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S.Ct. 1133 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1995); or we conduct an analysis under the state and f…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. Warden, No. Cv 01-080 89 66 (Nov. 8, 2001) Ct Page 15941-Mk
See, e.g., State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183 , 283 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S.Ct. 1133 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1995) (relying on date of offense in retroactivity analysis of change in law ultimately found to be procedural); State v. Jones, 132 Conn. 682 , 684-85 , 47 A.2d 185 (1946) (application of statute requiring court in certain pending cases to order examination of defendant for venereal disease, enacted after date of offense but prior to arrest, would impermissibly give it retroactive effect); see also State v. Millhouse, 3 Conn. App. 497 , 501 , 490 A.2d 517 (198…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bell v. Warden, No. Cv01-811672 (Oct. 24, 2001)
See, e.g., State v. Ross , 230 Conn. 183 , 283 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S.Ct. 1133 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1995) (relying on date of offense in retroactivity analysis of change in law ultimately found to be procedural); State v. Jones , 132 Conn. 682 , 684-85 , 47 A.2d 185 (1946) (application of statute requiring court in certain pending cases to order examination of defendant for venereal disease, enacted after date of offense but prior to arrest, would impermissibly give it retroactive effect); see also State v. Millhouse , 3 Conn. App. 497 , 501 , 490 A.2d 517 (…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Petitpas v. Warden, No. Cv01-0810389-S (Sep. 28, 2001)
See, e.g., State v. Ross , 230 Conn. 183 , 283 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S.Ct. 1133 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1995) (relying on date of offense in retroactivity analysis of change in law ultimately found to be procedural); State v. Jones , 132 Conn. 682 , 684-85 , 47 A.2d 185 (1946) (application of statute requiring court in certain pending cases to order examination of defendant for venereal disease, enacted after date of offense but prior to arrest, would impermissibly give it retroactive effect); see also State v. Millhouse , 3 Conn. App. 497 , 501 , 490 A.2d 517 (…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Warden, No. Cv01-0810531-S (Sep. 28, 2001)
See, e.g., State v. Ross , 230 Conn. 183 , 283 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S.Ct. 1133 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1995) (relying on date of offense in retroactivity analysis of change in law ultimately found to be procedural); State v. Jones , 132 Conn. 682 , 684-85 , 47 A.2d 185 (1946) (application of statute requiring court in certain pending cases to order examination of defendant for venereal disease, enacted after date of offense but prior to arrest, would impermissibly give it retroactive effect); see also State v. Millhouse , 3 Conn. App. 497 , 501 , 490 A.2d 517 (…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garabedian v. Warden, No. Cv01-0810834-S (Sep. 28, 2001)
See, e.g., State v. Ross , 230 Conn. 183 , 283 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S.Ct. 1133 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1995) (relying on date of offense in retroactivity analysis of change in law ultimately found to be procedural); State v. Jones , 132 Conn. 682 , 684-85 , 47 A.2d 185 (1946) (application of statute requiring court in certain pending cases to order examination of defendant for venereal disease, enacted after date of offense but prior to arrest, would impermissibly give it retroactive effect); see also State v. Millhouse , 3 Conn. App. 497 , 501 , 490 A.2d 517 (…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Woods v. Warden, No. Cv 99-587087 S (Sep. 13, 2001)
See, e.g., State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183 , 283 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S.Ct. 1133 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1995) (relying on date of offense in retroactivity analysis of change in law ultimately found to be procedural); State v. Jones, 132 Conn. 682 , 684-85 , 47 A.2d 185 (1946) (application of statute requiring court in certain pending cases to order examination of defendant for venereal disease, enacted after date of offense but prior to arrest, would impermissibly give it retroactive effect); see also State v. Millhouse, 3 Conn. App. 497 , 501 , 490 A.2d 517 (198…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Antunes v. Commissioner of Correction, No. Cv00-0805635 (Mar. 21, 2001)
See, e.g., State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183 , 283 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S.Ct. 1133 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1995) (relying on date of offense in retroactivity analysis of change in law ultimately found to be procedural); State v. Jones, 132 Conn. 682 , 684-85 , 47 A.2d 185 (1946) (application of statute requiring court in certain pending cases to order examination of defendant for venereal disease, enacted after date of offense but prior to arrest, would impermissibly give it retroactive effect); see also State v. Millhouse, 3 Conn. App. 497 , 501 , 490 A.2d 517 (198…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Janton v. Comm. of Correction, No. Cv00-0805674 (Mar. 21, 2001)
See, e.g., State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183 , 283 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S.Ct. 1133 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1995) (relying on date of offense in retroactivity analysis of change in law ultimately found to be procedural); State v. Jones, 132 Conn. 682 , 684-85 , 47 A.2d 185 (1946) (application of statute requiring court in certain pending cases to order examination of defendant for venereal disease, enacted after date of offense but prior to arrest, would impermissibly give it retroactive effect); see also State v. Millhouse, 3 Conn. App. 497 , 501 , 490 A.2d 517 (198…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nadeau v. Comm. of Correction, No. Cv00-0805673 (Mar. 21, 2001) Ct Page 4135
See, e.g., State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183 , 283 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S.Ct. 1133 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1995) (relying on date of offense in retroactivity analysis of change in law ultimately CT Page 4144 found to be procedural); State v. Jones, 132 Conn. 682 , 684-85 , 47 A.2d 185 (1946) (application of statute requiring court in certain pending cases to order examination of defendant for venereal disease, enacted after date of offense but prior to arrest, would impermissibly give it retroactive effect); see also State v. Millhouse, 3 Conn. App. 497 , 501 , 490 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Whistnant v. Comm. of Correction, No. Cv00-0557297 (Mar. 21, 2001)
See, e.g., State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183 , 283 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S.Ct. 1133 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1995) (relying on date of offense in retroactivity analysis of change in law ultimately found to be procedural); State v. Jones, 132 Conn. 682 , 684-85 , 47 A.2d 185 (1946) (application of statute requiring court in certain pending cases to order examination of defendant for venereal disease, enacted after date of offense but prior to arrest, would impermissibly give it retroactive effect); see also State v. Millhouse, 3 Conn. App. 497 , 501 , 490 A.2d 517 (198…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garabedian v. Armstrong, No. Cv00-805636-S (Mar. 19, 2001)
See, e.g., State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183 , 283 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S.Ct. 1133 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1995) (relying on date of offense in retroactivity analysis of change in law ultimately found to be procedural); State v. Jones, 132 Conn. 682 , 684-85 , 47 A.2d 185 (1946) (application of statute requiring court in certain pending cases to order examination of defendant for venereal disease, enacted after date of offense but prior to arrest, would impermissibly give it retroactive effect); see also State v. Millhouse, 3 Conn. App. 497 , 501 , 490 A.2d 517 (198…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Woods v. Warden, No. Cv 99-587087 S (Sep. 13, 2000)
See, e.g., State v. Ross , 230 Conn. 183 , 283 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S.Ct. 1133 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1995) (relying on date of offense in retroactivity analysis of change in law ultimately found to be procedural); State v. Jones , 132 Conn. 682 , 684-85 , 47 A.2d 185 (1946) (application of statute requiring court in certain pending cases to order examination of defendant for venereal disease, enacted after date of offense but prior to arrest, would impermissibly give it retroactive effect); see also State v. Millhouse , 3 Conn. App. 497 , 501 , 490 A.2d 517 (…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Woods v. Warden, No. Cv 99-587087 S (Sep. 13, 2000)
See, e.g., State v. Ross , 230 Conn. 183 , 283 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S.Ct. 1133 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1995) (relying on date of offense in retroactivity analysis of change in law ultimately found to be procedural); State v. Jones , 132 Conn. 682 , 684-85 , 47 A.2d 185 (1946) (application of statute requiring court in certain pending cases to order examination of defendant for venereal disease, enacted after date of offense but prior to arrest, would impermissibly give it retroactive effect); see also State v. Millhouse , 3 Conn. App. 497 , 501 , 490 A.2d 517 (…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Woods v. Warden, No. Cv 99-587087 S (Sep. 13, 2000)
See, e.g., State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183 , 283 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S.Ct. 1133 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1995) (relying on date of offense in retroactivity analysis of change in law ultimately found to be procedural); State v. Jones, 132 Conn. 682 , 684-85 , 47 A.2d 185 (1946) (application of statute requiring court in certain pending cases to order examination of defendant for venereal disease, enacted after date of offense but prior to arrest, would impermissibly give it retroactive effect); see also State v. Millhouse, 3 Conn. App. 497 , 501 , 490 A.2d 517 (198…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Woods v. Warden, No. Cv 99-587087 S (Sep. 13, 2000)
See, e.g., State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183 , 283 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S.Ct. 1133 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1095 (1995) (relying on date of offense in retroactivity analysis of change in law ultimately found to be procedural); State v. Jones, 132 Conn. 682 , 684-85 , 47 A.2d 185 (1946) (application of statute requiring court in certain pending cases to order examination of defendant for venereal disease, enacted after date of offense but prior to arrest, would impermissibly give it retroactive effect); see also State v. Millhouse, 3 Conn. App. 497 , 501 , 490 A.2d 517 (198…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Parra
See, e.g., State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 283 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Connecticut v. Porter
See General Statutes § 53a-46a (c); see also State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 268 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Daniel H.
See, e.g., State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 283 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Republic Insurance v. Pat Dinardo Auto Sales, Inc.
See, e.g., State v. Ross, 230 Conn. 183, 281-83 , 646 A.2d 1318 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1165 , 115 S. Ct. 1133 , 130 L.
Njoku
v.
Schmidt
v.
Schmidt
No. 94-7273.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1995.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.