Gossage v. Oldenkamp, 513 U.S. 1174 (1995). · Go Syfert
Gossage v. Oldenkamp, 513 U.S. 1174 (1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
80 citation events (24 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hogan v. Gibson (ca10, 1999-12-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Hogan v. Gibson (2×)
10th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence high
hogan ii
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Torres v. States (2×)
Okla. Crim. App. · 1998 · signal: see · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence high
unless objection is made to evidentiary harpoons any error is deemed waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal
discussed Cited "see" United States v. John Javilo McCullah
10th Cir. · 1996 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord United States v. Pessefall, 27 F.3d 511, 517 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S.-, *1106 115 S.Ct. 1154 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1995); United States v. Corral-Ibarra, 25 F.3d 430, 438 (7th Cir.1994).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Siegelman (2×)
M.D. Ala. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Pessefall, 27 F.3d 511, 515-16 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied sub nom Rickman v. United States, 513 U.S. 1174 , 115 S.Ct. 1154 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1995); United States v. Guida, 792 F.2d 1087, 1093-94 (11th Cir.1986); Llewellyn v. Stynchcombe, 609 F.2d 194, 195-96 (5th Cir.), reh’g denied, 613 F.2d 314 (5th Cir.1980).
examined Cited "see, e.g." Slaughter v. State (4×)
Okla. Crim. App. · 1997 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Hogan v. State, 877 P.2d 1157, 1163 (Okl.Cr.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1174 , 115 S.Ct. 1154 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1111 (1995).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Williams v. State (2×)
Okla. Crim. App. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
People v. Hoskins, 403 Mich. 95 , 267 N.W.2d 417, 419 (1978) (defendant may prove state of mind circumstantially and any contrary ruling violates privilege against self-incrimination); Dubose v. State, 187 Ga.App. 293 , 369 S.E.2d 924, 925-26 (1988) (defendant need not testify but may establish self-defense through other witnesses or circumstantial evidence). [6] Holloway v. State, 712 P.2d 68, 69 (Okl.Cr. 1986) (defendant's statements presented in State's case show deliberate killing). [7] See, e.g., Bechtel v. State, 840 P.2d 1, 6 (Okl.Cr. 1992); Camron v. State, 829 P.2d 47, 52 (Okl.Cr. 199…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Romano v. State (2×)
Okla. Crim. App. · 1995 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare with Hogan v. State, 877 P.2d 1157, 1161 (Okl.Cr.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1154 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1111 (1995); and Fox, 779 P.2d at 570 (holding blood spatter experts properly testified as to the location, order and method of killings in cases where the experts did not testify to the defendants’ role in the crimes); 12 O.S.1991, § 2702.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Willie George Childress (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Pessefall, 27 F.3d 511, 515 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 1154 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1995); United States v. Bianco, 922 F.2d 910, 912 (1st Cir.1991).
Gossage
v.
Oldenkamp
No. 94-7481.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1995.
513 U.S. 1174

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.