green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Reece v. United States
See United States v. Scrivner, 114 F.3d 964, 970 (9th Cir.1997) ("[W]here defendants do not object at trial or sentencing about the type of methamphetamine involved in their case, it is not plain error for a district court to sentence those defendants based on their involvement with the more common methamphetamine, without making a factual finding to classify the methamphetamine as D-melh, as opposed to Lmeth.”); United States v. Deninno, 29 F.3d 572, 580 (10th Cir.1994) (finding no plain error because the defendant had failed to object at sentencing to the scoring of the methamphetamine, be…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mayes
See United States v. Camacho, 40 F.3d 349, 355 (11th Cir.1994) (“Generally, we do not consider claims of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal, because there usually has been insufficient opportunity to develop the record regarding the merits of these claims.”), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1090 , 115 S.Ct. 1810 , 131 L.Ed.2d 735 (1995). 7 .All of the appellants raise the double jeopardy issue on appeal except Baker, Moore and Nurur-din. 8 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mayes
See United States v. Camacho, 40 F.3d 349, 355 (11th Cir. 1994) (“Generally, we do not consider claims of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal, because there usually has been insufficient opportunity to develop the record regarding the merits of these claims.”), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1090 (1995). 7 appellants rely upon the third of these types of abuses to argue that the district court erred in denying their motions to dismiss the superseding indictment.7 Specifically, they contend that the Bureau of Prisons “punished” them with various disciplinary sanctions and that th…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gruber
See United States v. Robertson, 39 F.3d 891, 892 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1090 , 115 S.Ct. 1812 , 131 L.Ed.2d 736 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bankston
See United States v. Camacho, 40 F.3d 349, 354 (11th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1090 , 115 S.Ct. 1810 , 131 L.Ed.2d 735 (1995). 4 a term exceeding one year, regardless of whether such offense is specifically designated as a felony and regardless of the actual sentence imposed.” U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2, comment. (n.3) (Nov. 1, 1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1997
See United States v. Bogusz, 43 F.3d 82, 89 (3d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1090 , 115 S.Ct. 1812 , 131 L.Ed.2d 736 (1995); USSG § 2D1.1, comment. (n.10) (Drug Equivalency Tables) (Nov.1990). 2 4 At the time of sentencing in the present case, the government had in its possession small traces of methamphetamine obtained from objects seized from some of the conspirators.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Magallon
See United States v. Bogusz, 43 F.3d 82, 89 (3d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1090 , 115 S.Ct. 1812 , 131 L.Ed.2d 736 (1995); USSG § 2D1.1, comment, (n.10) (Drug Equivalency Tables) (Nov.1990). 2 At the time of sentencing in the present case, the government had in its possession small traces of methamphetamine obtained from objects seized from some of the conspirators.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Montgomery, Shelton Wade
Compare United States v. Camacho, 49 F.3d 349 (11th Cir. 1994) (court made specific findings of fact after an evidentiary hearing regarding defend- ant’s credibility), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1090 , 115 S.Ct. 1810 , 131 L.Ed.2d 735 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Montgomery, Shelton Wade
Compare United States v. Camacho, 49 F.3d 349 (11th Cir. 1994) (court made specific findings of fact after an evidentiary hearing regarding defend- ant’s credibility), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1090 , 115 S.Ct. 1810 , 131 L.Ed.2d 735 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ATTERBURY, CHARLES JOSEPH Jr.
Compare United States v. Camacho, 49 F.3d 349 (11th Cir. 1994) (court 4 made specific findings of fact after an evidentiary hearing regarding defendant’s credibility), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1090 , 115 S.Ct. 1810 , 131 L.Ed.2d 735 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gallego v. United States
(2×)
Compare United States v. Camacho, 40 F.3d 349 (11th Cir.1994)(court made specific findings of fact after an evidentiary hearing regarding defendant's credibility), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1090 , 115 S.Ct. 1810 , 131 L.Ed.2d 735 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gallego v. United States
Compare United States v. Camacho, 40 F.3d 349 (11th Cir. 1994)(court made specific findings of fact after an evidentiary hearing regarding defendant’s credibility), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1090 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3958, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6451 United States of America v. Mary Peggy Moore, United States of America v. Lee Roy Wiley
See also United States v. Howell, 37 F.3d 1197, 1202 (7th Cir.), mandate recalled for limited purpose of permitting appellants to file petitions for rehearing, 37 F.3d 1207 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1090 , 115 S.Ct. 1810 , 131 L.Ed.2d 735 (1995); United States v. Straach, 987 F.2d 232, 239 (5th Cir.1993); United States v. Hern, 926 F.2d 764, 768 (8th Cir.1991); United States v. Lawrence, 680 F.2d 1126, 1128 (6th Cir.1982); and United States v. Brooks, 611 F.2d 614, 617 (5th Cir.1980).
Davis
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 94-8593.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 24, 1995.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.