green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Espinal
See Commonwealth v. Seguin , 421 Mass. 243 , 249, 656 N.E.2d 1229 (1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1180 , 116 S.Ct. 1280 , 134 L.Ed.2d 226 (1996). 8 Of course, questions related to race and ethnicity may be appropriate even in situations where there is no racial or ethnic difference between a defendant and a victim.
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Toolan
See Commonwealth v. Seguin, 421 Mass. 243, 249 (1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1180 (1996) (where defendant raises lack of criminal responsibility, jurors must be asked individually whether they hold opinion preventing them from returning verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity if Commonwealth fails in its burden to prove criminal responsibility).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Morales
See id. (although individual voir dire required if lack of criminal responsibility may be an issue and if defendant so requests, see Commonwealth v. Seguin, 421 Mass. 243, 247-249 [1995], cert, denied, 516 U.S. 1180 [1996], rule not extended to encompass cases in which evidence of mental illness or mental impairment presented). 8.
discussed
Cited "see"
Slaughter v. Parker
See United States v. Tines, 70 F.3d 891, 896 (6th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1180 , 116 S.Ct. 1280 , 134 L.Ed.2d 225 (1996) (Fed.R.Evid.606(b) precluded the introduction of juror’s affidavit that attempted to explain the effect of an Allen charge in a criminal trial, wherein Tennessee prison guards were charged with depriving inmates of their civil rights under state law).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sharp
Idaho v. Wright, 497 U.S. 805, 814 , 110 S.Ct. 3139 , 111 L.Ed.2d 638 (1990); see also Sherman v. Scott, 62 F.3d 136, 140 (5th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1180 , 116 S.Ct. 1279 , 134 L.Ed.2d 225 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Francis
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Seguin, 421 Mass. 243, 249 (1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1180 (1996) (requiring individual voir dire of jurors on issue of insanity defense); Commonwealth v. Mutina, 366 Mass. 810 , 822-823 & n.12 (1975) (requiring judge to instruct on postverdict consequences of acquittal by reason of insanity when defendant or jury so requests).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Franks v. State
See Golden v. First City Nat’l Bank, 751 S.W.2d 639, 643-44 (Tex.App.Dallas 1988, no writ). , The Fifth Circuit has also reached the same conclusion under rule 606(b) of the federal rules of evidence. 6 United States v. Wickersham, 29 F.3d 191, 194 (5th Cir.1994) (concluding that jury’s interpretation of Allen charge was inadmissible); see also United States v. Tines, 70 F.3d 891, 898 (6th Cir.1995) (explaining that a “jury’s interpretation *802 and application of the court’s instructions is a part of the deliberative process and was correctly excluded” under federal rule 606(b)), …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Kennedy
Idaho v. Wright, 497 U.S. 805, 814 , 110 S.Ct. 3139, 3145 , 111 L.Ed.2d 638 (1990); see also Sherman v. Scott, 62 F.3d 136, 140 (5th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1180 , 116 S.Ct. 1279 , 134 L.Ed.2d 225 (1996).
Tines
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 95-7746.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 18, 1996.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.