green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.6 score
“as with any statutory question, we begin with the language of the statute”
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Redwine v. STARBOARD, LLC
But cf. State v. Tenbusch, 131 Or App 634, 641 , 886 P2d 1077 (1994), rev den, 320 Or 587 , cert den, 516 US 991 (1995) (analyzing the Oregon and federal constitutional privileges together “because the protections are similar”).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Wagner v. Christiana Bank & Trust Co. (In Re Wagner)
s with any statutory question, we begin with the language of the statute
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Bufford
as with any statutory question, we begin with the language of the statute
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Reed
See State v. Tenbusch, 131 Or App 634, 643 , 886 P2d 1077 (1994), rev den, 320 Or 587 , cert den, 516 US 991 , 116 S Ct 523 , 133 L Ed 2d 430 (1995) (“ ‘[I]f the State, either expressly or by implication, asserts that invocation of the privilege [against 1 See, e.g., State v. Love-Faust, 309 Or App 734, 742 , 483 P3d 45 , adh’d to as modified on recons, 311 Or App 756 , 489 P3d 149 (2021) (citing Dunlap in sup- port of the conclusion that the circumstances were not sufficiently compelling to require Miranda warnings, in part, because the probation officer “did not com- municate that th…
discussed
Cited "see"
King v. ZAMIARA
(2×)
See Ward v. Dyke, 58 F.3d 271, 274 (6th Cir.) (citing specific numbers of grievances the allegedly disruptive plaintiff filed), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 991 , 116 S.Ct. 524 , 133 L.Ed.2d 431 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Josephs
(2×)
See generally, United States v. Olbres, 61 F. 3d 967, 970 (1st Cir.) ("So long as the evidence, taken as a whole, warrants a judgment of conviction, `it need not rule out other hypotheses more congenial to a finding of innocence.'"), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 991 , 116 S.Ct. 522 , 133 L.Ed. 2d 430 (1995); United States v. Sawyer, 294 F. 2d 24, 31 (4th Cir.) (noting that prosecution is not required to exclude every hypothesis except that of guilty beyond reasonable doubt and stating that jury is responsible for weighing evidence to find guilt beyond reasonable doubt), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 916 , …
discussed
Cited "see"
Blevins v. State
(2×)
See Powell v. State, 898 S.W.2d 821, 827 (Tex.Crim.App.1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 991 , 116 S.Ct. 524 , 133 L.Ed.2d 431 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Heidelberg v. State
(2×)
See Powell v. State, 898 S.W.2d 821, 829 (Tex.Crim.App.1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 991 , 116 S.Ct. 524 , 133 L.Ed.2d 431 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Moore v. Time Warner GRC 9
See Kotlowski v. Eastman Kodak Co., 922 F.Supp. 790, 798 (W.D.N.Y.1996); see also Misek-Falkoff v. IBM Corp. 854 F.Supp. 215 (S.D.N.Y.1994) (“Some degree of regular, predictable attendance is fundamental to most jobs”), aff'd, 60 F.3d 811 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 991 , 116 S.Ct. 522 , 133 L.Ed.2d 429 (1995) and 517 U.S. 1111 , 116 S.Ct. 1333 , 134 L.Ed.2d 484 (1996).
Liberatore
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 95-680.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 27, 1995.
Published
Citer courts: W.D. Pennsylvania (1) · N.D. Texas (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.