United States v. O'Hagan, 519 U.S. 1087 (1997). · Go Syfert
United States v. O'Hagan, 519 U.S. 1087 (1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
41 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Allapattah Services, Inc. v. Exxon Corp. (flsd, 1999-07-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Allapattah Services, Inc. v. Exxon Corp.
S.D. Fla. · 1999 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
parties who have allocated risks among themselves by contract should not be permitted to ignore their bargain after incurring a loss involving the subject matter of the contract.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Gregory Hill
8th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Crowder, 519 U.S. 1087 , 117 S.Ct. 760 , 136 L.Ed.2d 708 (1997).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Gregory Hill
8th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Crowder, 519 U.S. 1087 (1997).
cited Cited "see" St. Charles v. America's Favorite
11th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Motorcity of Jacksonville, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank N.A., 83 F.3d 1317, 1323 (11th Cir. 1996), vacated on other grounds by Hess v. F.D.I.C., 519 U.S. 1087 , 117 S. Ct. 760 , 136 L.
discussed Cited "see" St. Charles Foods, Inc. v. America's Favorite Chicken Co.
11th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Motorcity of Jacksonville, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank N.A., 83 F.3d 1317, 1323 (11th Cir.1996), vacated on other grounds by Hess v. F.D.I.C., 519 U.S. 1087 , 117 S.Ct. 760 , 136 L.Ed.2d 708 (1997), reinstated by Motorcity of Jacksonville, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank N.A., 120 F.3d 1140 (11th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1093 , 118 S.Ct. 1559 , 140 L.Ed.2d 791 (1998).
cited Cited "see" Sandoval v. Hagan
11th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Motorcity of Jacksonville, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank, 83 F.3d 1317 , 1323 (11th Cir.1996) (en banc), vacated on other grounds, Hess v. FDIC, 519 U.S. 1087 , 117 S.Ct. 760 , 136 L.Ed.2d 708 (1997).
discussed Cited "see" Federal Deposit Insurance Ex Rel. Western Gulf Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Noel
10th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Motorcity of Jacksonville, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank, 83 F.3d 1317 , 1327, 1329-30 (11th Cir.1996) (en banc), vacated by Hess v. FDIC, 519 U.S. 1087 , 117 S.Ct. 760 , 136 L.Ed.2d 708 (1997); DiVall Insured Income Fund Ltd.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Fortin (2×)
N.J. · 2007 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Crowder, 87 F. 3d 1405, 1413 (D.C.Cir.1996) (rejecting defendants' method of packaging drugs as signature crime and stating that "the Government presented no evidence, expert or otherwise, that the mode of packaging was distinctive to [defendant] or even unusual in the drug trade"), vacated o.b. on other grounds, 519 U.S. 1087 , 117 S.Ct. 760 , 136 L.Ed. 2d 708 (1997).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Murphy v. Federal Deposit Insurance
11th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Motorcity of Jacksonville, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank N.A., (“Motorcity I”), 83 F.3d 1317, 1326 (11th Cir.1996) (en banc), vacated and remanded by Hess v. FDIC, 519 U.S. 1087 , 117 S.Ct. 760 , 136 L.Ed.2d 708 (1997), reinstated by Motorcity of Jacksonville, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank N.A., (“Motorcity II”), 120 F.3d 1140 (11th Cir.1997), (en banc), cert. denied, Hess v. FDIC, 523 U.S. 1093 , 118 S.Ct. 1559 , 140 L.Ed.2d 791 (1998). 3 We have held that the doctrine “‘applies in virtually all cases where a federal depository institution regulatory agency is confronted with an agreem…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
O'Hagan
No. 96-842.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 17, 1997.
519 U.S. 1087

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari granted. Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, February 28, 1997. Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, March 28,1997. A reply brief, if any, may be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Wednesday, April 9, 1997. This Court’s Rule 29.2 does not apply.