green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2003 ·
…once a court determines that a case involves legal issues, the litigants have a right to a jury trial on those issues, regardless of how insignificant they may appear in relation to equitable issues.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mary Elizabeth Leary and Glenda H. Williams v. Stephen Daeschner
(2×)
once a court determines that a case involves legal issues, the litigants have a right to a jury trial on those issues, regardless of how insignificant they may appear in relation to equitable issues.
cited
Cited "see"
Maggett v. Middlebrooks
See United States v. Fields, 72 F.3d 1200, 1207 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 807 , 117 S.Ct. 48 , 136 L.Ed.2d 13 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Stewart v. Middlebrooks
See United States v. Fields, 72 F.3d 1200, 1207 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 807 , 117 S.Ct. 48 , 136 L.Ed.2d 13 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Offshore Specialty Fabricators, Inc.
See United Ass’n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipe Fitting Indus., AFL-CIO v. Reno, 73 F.3d 1134, 1140-41 (D.C.Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 807 , 117 S.Ct. 49 , 136 L.Ed.2d 13 (1996); Piledrivers’ Local Union No. 2875 v. Smith, 695 F.2d 390, 393-94 (9th Cir.1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hernandez
See United States v. Fields, 72 F.3d 1200, 1212 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 807 , 117 S.Ct. 48 , 136 L.Ed.2d 13 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Ingram v. Toledo City School District Board of Education
See Golden v. Kelsey-Hayes Co., 73 F.3d 648, 657 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 807 , 117 S.Ct. 49 , 136 L.Ed.2d 13 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Leary v. Daeschner
See Golden v. Kelsey-Hayes Co., 73 F.3d 648, 660 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 807 (1996) (“Once III.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Tatum
See United States v. Fields, 72 F.3d 1200, 1213 (5th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 807 , 117 S.Ct. 48 , 136 L.Ed.2d 13 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Doe v. Hartz
See [United States v.] Wilson, 73 F.3d [675,] 685 [ (7th Cir.1995) ] (“In discussing the lack of a jurisdictional element in Lopez , the Court simply did not state or imply that all criminal statutes must have such an element, or that all statutes with such an element would be constitutional, or that any statute without such an element is per se unconstitutional.’’^, cert. denied, — U.S. --, 117 S.Ct. 47 , 136 L.Ed.2d 12 (1996)].
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Weslin
See United States v. Wilson, 73 F.3d 675 (7th Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 47 , 136 L.Ed.2d 12 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Reed HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant
The federal bank robbery statute contains jurisdictional language that requires the prosecutor to establish a connection to interstate commerce because the statute’s coverage is limited to banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System or insured by the FDIC. 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (f); see United States v. Wilson, 73 F.3d 675, 694 (7th Cir.1995)(Coffey, J., dissenting), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 47 , 136 L.Ed.2d 12 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baldwin v. Reagan
See, e.g., United States v. Fields, 72 F.3d 1200, 1212 (5th Cm.) (upholding against federal constitutional challenge the impoundment and inventory search of a vehicle stopped for a seat belt violation where *339 driver had not updated the address on his license and did not have proof of insurance), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 807 , 117 S.Ct. 48 , 136 L.Ed.2d 13 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stattin
v.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Statutory Successor to Resolution Trust Corporation, and as Receiver for Florida Federal Savings, F. S. B.
v.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Statutory Successor to Resolution Trust Corporation, and as Receiver for Florida Federal Savings, F. S. B.
No. 95-1573.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1996.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (2)
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.