Brown v. Cain, 520 U.S. 1195 (1997). · Go Syfert
Brown v. Cain, 520 U.S. 1195 (1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Joe Mario Trevino, Jr. v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division (ca5, 1999-02-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Joe Mario Trevino, Jr. v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division (2×)
5th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brown v. Cain, 104 F.3d 744, 750 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1195 , 117 S.Ct. 1489 , 137 L.Ed.2d 699 (1997); Kennedy, 54 F.3d at 682.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Panetti v. Dretke
W.D. Tex. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
Additionally, no habeas relief may be granted unless the petitioner can show the state court’s adjudication of the claim resulted in a decision that was (1) “contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States” or was (2) “based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d); see also Brown v. Cain, 104 F.3d 744, 749 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1195 , 117 S.Ct. 1489 , 137 L.Ed.2d 699 (1997).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Tenny v. Cockrell (2×)
W.D. Tex. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
Standard for Review under AED-PA Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AED-PA”), a federal court may grant a state prisoner’s federal habeas petition as to any *626 claim addressed by the state courts on the merits only if the state court’s decision was (1) “contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States” or was (2) “based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Rodriguez v. Zavaras
D. Colo. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Brown v. Cain, 104 F.3d 744, 749 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1195 , 117 S.Ct. 1489 , 137 L.Ed.2d 699 (1997); Neelley, 138 F.3d at 924-25 ; Carter v. Johnson, 110 F.3d at 1103 n. 4.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Littlejohn v. State (2×)
Okla. Crim. App. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Allen v. State, 1996 OK CR 9 , 923 P.2d 613, 620-21 , cert. granted, 520 U.S. 1195 , 117 S.Ct. 1551 , 137 L.Ed.2d 699 (1997). 10 ¶ 41 In the present case, the State presented no evidence that Littlejohn considered injuring anyone other than the actual victim.
Brown
v.
Cain, Warden
No. 96-8624 (A-728).
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 23, 1997.
520 U.S. 1195
Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Scalia, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.