green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Reyes Canada v. Rey Hernandez
See Diaz-Rivera v. Rivera-Rodriguez, 377 F.3d 119 (1st Cir.2004). 2 Such authority supports, at least in this instance, plaintiffs’ request to consolidate the judgment and ruling on attorney’s fees for purposes of appeal. 3 See also Ridder v. City of Springfield, 109 F.3d 288 , 292 n. 4 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1046 , 118 S.Ct. 687 , 139 L.Ed.2d 634 (1998) (holding in Section 1983 case that concurrent consideration by Magistrate-Judge of challenges to the merits and imposition of sanctions avoided piecemeal appeals and laudably conserved judicial resources as encouraged in Wh…
discussed
Cited "see"
Tropf v. Fidelity National Title Insurance
See Ridder v. City of Springfield, 109 F.3d 288, 297-98 (6th Cir.1997), ce rt. denied, 522 U.S. 1046 , 118 S.Ct. 687 , 139 L.Ed.2d 634 (1998) (imposing monetary sanctions pursuant to § 1927 in case where Rule 11 did not apply). .
cited
Cited "see"
Davis v. Bowron
See Ridder v. Springfield, 109 F.3d 288, 298 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1046 , 118 S.Ct. 687 , 139 L.Ed.2d 634 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
VanDanacker v. Main Motor Sales Co.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Ridder v. City of Springfield, 109 F.3d 288 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1046 , 118 S.Ct. 687 , 139 L.Ed.2d 634 (1998); Hockley v. Shan Enterprises Limited Partnership, 19 F.Supp.2d 235 (D.N.J.1998); Photocircuits Corp. v. Marathon Agents, Inc., 162 F.R.D. 449 (E.D.N.Y.1995). 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
TAL Technologies, Inc. v. L.D. Rhodes Oil Co.
See, Barber v. Miller, 146 F.3d 707 (9th Cir.1998) (reversing Rule 11 sanctions because the motion for sanctions was not served 21 days before filing it), Ridder v. City of Springfield, 109 F.3d 288, 294-95, 297 (6th Cir.1997), cert den. 522 U.S. 1046 , 118 S.Ct. 687 , 139 L.Ed.2d 634 (1998) (disallowed Rule 11 sanctions because defendant failed to comply with the Rule's explicit procedural prerequisite), AeroTech, Inc. v. Estes, 110 F.3d 1523, 1528-29 (10th Cir.1997) ("Because Vernon Estes did not move for Rule 11 sanctions until after AeroTech had moved to dismiss its claims against him, we …
cited
Cited "see"
Shackelford v. Courtesy Ford, Inc.
See Ridder v. Springfield, 109 F.3d 288, 295-296 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1046 , 118 S.Ct. 687 , 139 L.Ed.2d 634 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co. v. Milliken
See, e.g., Shakespeare Co. v. Silstar Corp. of America, Inc., 906 F.Supp. 997, 1002 (D.S.C.1995) (noting that the mandate is the “official mode of communicating the judgment of an appellate court to a lower court, thereby directing action to be taken or disposition to be made of the cause by the trial court”) (citation and brackets omitted), aff'd, 110 F.3d 234 (4th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1046 , 118 S.Ct. 688 , 139 L.Ed.2d 634 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Domino's Pizza, Inc.
v.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
v.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
No. 97-552.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1998.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.