Kendall v. Kendall, 524 U.S. 953 (1998). · Go Syfert
Kendall v. Kendall, 524 U.S. 953 (1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the determination of custody rests within the discretion of the judge”
38 citation events (29 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Imbrie v. Imbrie (massappct, 2023-05-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Imbrie v. Imbrie
Mass. App. Ct. · 2023 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the determination of custody rests within the discretion of the judge
discussed Cited "see" In Re Lite Ray Realty Corp.
Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Matter of Klein, 231 A.D.2d 232 , 660 N.Y.S.2d 136 (N.Y.App.Div.1997), appeal dismissed & mot. for leave to appeal denied, 90 N.Y.2d 929 , 664 N.Y.S.2d 262 , 686 N.E.2d 1357 , reargument denied, 91 N.Y.2d 867 , 668 N.Y.S.2d 563 , 691 N.E.2d 635 , cert. denied, 524 U.S. 953 , 118 S.Ct. 2371 , 141 L.Ed.2d 738 (1998). 1 Nevertheless, he remains a member of the Southern District bar, and continues to practice law.
discussed Cited "see" Fernandez v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.
D. Colo. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bauchman v. West High School, 132 F.3d 542, 559 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 953 , 118 S.Ct. 2370 , 141 L.Ed.2d 738 (1998)(affirming the district court’s denial of a motion to amend the complaint because the amended claim would be subject to dismissal and the proposed amendment was therefore futile).
discussed Cited "see" Samuels v. Agency Ins Co of MD
4th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bauchman v. West High Sch. , 132 F.3d 542, 562 (10th Cir. 1997) (affirming denial of leave to amend where amend- ment would be futile), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 953 (1998); S.S.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." McCaffery v. McCaffery
La. Ct. App. · 2014 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., City of Kenner v. Jumonville, 97-125, 97-210, 97-602 p. 11 (La.App. 5 Cir. 8/27/97), 701 So.2d 223, 230 , writ denied, 97-2890 (La.1/30/98), 709 So.2d 718 , Cert. denied, 524 U.S. 953 , 118 S.Ct. 2371 , 141 L.Ed.2d 739 (1998). | ^Contempt against Sean’s Counsel In assignment of error number five, Sean asserts: The Trial Court erred in holding Counsel for Mr. McCaffery in contempt for asking a general question concerning requests to stop private schooling and erred in holding that contempt over Counsel’s head for two hearings.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Elk v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2009 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Co., 130 F.3d 1287, 1294-95 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 953 , 118 S.Ct. 2370 , 141 L.Ed.2d 738 (1998) (company that committed sex discrimination and sexual harassment took its employees as it found them and was responsible for aggravating preexisting emotional injuries); McKinnon v. Kwong Wah Restaurant, 83 F.3d 498, 507 (1st Cir.1996) (same conclusion in case involving sexual harassment); Wakefield v. NLRB, 779 F.2d 1437, 1438 (9th Cir.1986) (administrative agency wrongly held that plaintiff's predisposition towards mental illness relieved defe…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Horton v. Rockwell International Corp.
N.D. Iowa · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Rorie v. United Parcel Service Inc., 151 F.3d 757, 761 (8th Cir.1998), quoting Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite, Co., 130 F.3d 1287, 1303 (8th Cir.1997), cert denied, 524 U.S. 953 , 118 S.Ct. 2370 , 141 L.Ed.2d 738 (1998) (emphasis omitted).
Kendall
v.
Kendall
No. 97-1756.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 26, 1998.
524 U.S. 953

Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied.