green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
MadVapes Franchising, LLC v. American Vapes, Inc
See Howard v. Oakwood Homes Corp., 134 N.C.App. 116 , 121–22, 516 S.E.2d 879, 883 , disc. review denied, 350 N.C. 832 , 539 S.E.2d 288 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1155 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Anne Wedow v. City of Kansas City
See Kline v. City of Kansas City, Mo., Fire Dep’t, 175 F.3d 660 (8th Cir.1999) (“Kline I ”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1155 , 120 S.Ct. 1160 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1072 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wedow v. City Of Kansas City
See Kline v. City of Kansas City, Mo., Fire Dep't, 175 F.3d 660 (8th Cir.1999) (" Kline I "), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1155 , 120 S.Ct. 1160 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1072 (2000). 3 An understanding of certain aspects of the discrimination claims litigated in the first suit is necessary to this appeal.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sutton v. Messer
Wright v. T & B Auto Sales, Inc., 72 N.C.App. 449, 453 , 325 S.E.2d 493, 496 (1985); See Howard v. Oakwood Homes Corp., 134 N.C.App. 116, 120 , 516 S.E.2d 879, 882 (where the language of a contract is clear, the contract must be interpreted as written), disc. review denied, 350 N.C. 832 , 539 S.E.2d 288 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1155 , 120 S.Ct. 1161 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1072 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morris v. Conagra Foods, Inc.
See Kline v. City of Kansas City, Mo., Fire Dep’t, 175 F.3d 660, 665 (8th Cir.1999) (noting harassment occurring outside the limitations period may be relevant to provide background information, but that damages could only be recovered with respect to events occurring within the limitations period), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1155 , 120 S.Ct. 1160 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1072 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Phoenix v. Reddish
See Wilkinson v. Russell, 182 F.3d 89, 102 (2d Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1155 , 120 S.Ct. 1160 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1072 (2000); Weyant v. Okst, 101 F.3d 845, 857-58 (2d Cir.1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Kathleen Kline, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. City of Kansas City, Missouri, Fire Department, Appellant/cross-Appellee
See Kline v. City of Kansas City, Missouri, Fire Department, 175 F.3d 660, 664 (8th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1155 , 120 S.Ct. 1160 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1072 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mudarri v. State
To prevail, Mudarri must prove that the statute fails to afford like treatment to " persons similarly situated with respect to the legitimate purpose of the law...." State v. Coria, 120 Wash.2d 156, 169 , 839 P.2d 890 (1992) (emphasis added) (citing State v. Schaaf, 109 Wash.2d 1, 17 , 743 P.2d 240 (1987)); see also Gig Harbor Marina v. City of Gig Harbor, 94 Wash.App. 789, 797 , 973 P.2d 1081 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1155 , 120 S.Ct. 1162 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1073 (2000). ¶ 50 Mudarri's equal protection argument fails because he is not comparing himself to similarly situated persons.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Checkpoint Sys Inc v. Check Point Software
Id. at 1057 (internal citations omitted); see also Interstellar Starship Servs., Ltd. v. Epix Inc., 184 F.3d 1107 , 1110 (9th Cir. 1999) ("We recognize a brand of confusion called `initial interest' confusion, which permits a finding of a likelihood of confusion although the consumer quickly becomes aware of the source's actual identity and no purchase is made as a result of the confusion."), cert. denied , 528 U.S. 1155 (2000); but see Bryce J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Checkpoint Systems, Inc. v. Check Point Software Technologies, Inc.
Id. at 1057 (internal citations omitted); see also Interstellar Starship Servs., Ltd. v. Epix Inc., 184 F.3d 1107 , 1110 (9th Cir.1999) (“We recognize a brand of confusion called ‘initial interest’ confusion, which permits a finding of a likelihood of confusion although the consumer quickly becomes aware of the source’s actual identity and no purchase is made as a result of the confusion.”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1155 , 120 S.Ct. 1161 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1073 (2000); but see Bryce J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Axess Intern. Ltd. v. Intercargo Ins. Co.
Soc'y, 84 Wash.2d 612, 615 , 529 P.2d 7 (1974)); see also Solnicka, 93 Wash.App. at 533-34 , 969 P.2d 124 . [22] Kroeger, 80 Wash.App. at 210, 908 P.2d 371 (relying on Dayton, 124 Wash.2d at 281 , 876 P.2d 896 ). [23] Former 46 U.S.C.A.App. § 1721(a). [24] See Axess, 183 F.3d at 941-42 . [25] Former 46 U.S.C.A.App. § 1721(b). [26] Hoddevik v. Arctic Alaska Fisheries Corp., 94 Wash.App. 268, 278 , 970 P.2d 828 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1155 , 120 S.Ct. 1161 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1072 (2000). [27] Aqua-Marine Constructors, Inc. v. Banks, 110 F.3d 663, 667-68 (9th Cir.1997). [28] Offshore Logistic…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Statland et ux.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 99-893.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 2000.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.