Hicks v. United States, 528 U.S. 876 (1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Hicks v. United States, 528 U.S. 876 (1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“he touchstone for determining the commencement of the limitations period is notice”
17 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Vollemans v. Town of Wallingford (connappct, 2007-08-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Vollemans v. Town of Wallingford
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
he touchstone for determining the commencement of the limitations period is notice
discussed Cited "see" Snodgrass-King Pediatric Dental Associates, P.C. v. DentaQuest USA Insurance
M.D. Tenn. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See McClintock v. Eichelberger, 169 F.3d 812, 815-17 (3rd Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 876 , 120 S.Ct. 182 , 145 L.Ed.2d 154 (1999) (noting, in circumstances similar to those presented in this case, that the balancing test called for by Umbehr and O’Hare [Truck Service, Inc. v. City of Northlake, 518 U.S. 712 , 116 S.Ct. 2353 , 135 L.Ed.2d 874 (1996) ], was too strict, because the plaintiff did not have a preexisting, ongoing contractual relationship with the state).
discussed Cited "see" Vieux Desert Band Of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. The Michigan Gaming Control Board
6th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See McClintock v. Eichelberger, 169 F.3d 812, 815-17 (3rd Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 876 (1999) (noting, in circumstances similar to those presented in this case, that the balancing test called for by Umbehr and O'Hare was too strict, because the plaintiff did not have a pre-existing, ongoing contractual relationship with the state).
discussed Cited "see" Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Michigan Gaming Control Board
6th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See McClintock v. Eichelberger, 169 F.3d 812, 815-17 (3rd Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 876 , 120 S.Ct. 182 , 145 L.Ed.2d 154 (1999) (noting, in circumstances similar to those presented in this case, that the balancing test called for by Umbehr and O’Hare was too strict, because the plaintiff did not have a pre-existing, ongoing contractual relationship with the state).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hicks
v.
United States
No. 99-165.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1999.
528 U.S. 876
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 59%
Citer courts: Connecticut Appellate Court (1)

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.