green
Positive treatment
1.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bowling v. Parker
Therefore, for every claim adjudicated on the merits in state court, this Court must determine whether the state court’s decision was “contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of,” Supreme Court jurisprudence. 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d)(1); see Coe v. Bell, 209 F.3d 815, 822-23 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1084 , 120 S.Ct. 1716 , 146 L.Ed.2d 516 (2000).
Coe
v.
Bell, Warden
v.
Bell, Warden
No. 99-9127 (99A859).
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 18, 2000.
529 U.S. 1084
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Stevens, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.