green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mullen
See United States v. Comer, 1996 WL 492704 , *4 (N.D.N.Y.1996) (where the court denied defendants’ motions for a pretrial audibility hearing “without prejudice to renewal upon their particularized showing, after hearing the audiotapes, that an audibility hearing is necessary”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 886 , 121 S.Ct. 205 , 148 L.Ed.2d 143 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Atwood v. Mapes
See Tokar v. Bowersox, 198 F.3d 1039, 1046 (8th Cir.1999) (“if it is easier to dispose of an ineffectiveness claim on the ground of lack of sufficient prejudice, that course should be followed”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 886 , 121 S.Ct. 204 , 148 L.Ed.2d 143 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
RICHARD D. CLAY, — APPELLEE/CROSS v. MICHAEL BOWERSOX, — APPELLANT/CROSS
See Tokar v. Bowersox, 198 F.3d 1039, 1051 (8th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 886 , 121 S.Ct. 204 , 148 L.Ed.2d 143 (2000); Sloan v. Delo, 54 F.3d 1371, 1385-86 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1056 , 116 S.Ct. 728 , 133 L.Ed.2d 679 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Richard D. Clay v. Michael Bowersox
See Tokar v. Bowersox, 198 F.3d 1039, 1051 (8th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 886 (2000); Sloan v. Delo, 54 F.3d 1371, 1385-86 (8th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1056 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walters v. Maschner
See Johnson v. Norris, 207 F.3d 515 , 517 & 520-21 (8th Cir.) (alleged ineffective assistance in jury selection), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 886 , 121 S.Ct. 205 , 148 L.Ed.2d 144 (2000); White v. Helling, 194 F.3d 937, 940-41 (8th Cir.1999) (alleged ineffective assistance in failing to strike a juror or to examine a spectator, who was a relative of the victim, with whom the juror was seen conversing); Cox v. Norris, 133 F.3d 565, 573-74 (8th Cir.1997) (alleged ineffective assistance in alienating a juror), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 834 , 119 S.Ct. 89 , 142 L.Ed.2d 70 (1998); Goeders v. Hundley, 59 F.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Griswold v. Morgan
Ylst v. Nunnemaker, 501 U.S. 797, 801 , 111 S.Ct. 2590 , 115 L.Ed.2d 706 (1991); see also Tokar v. Bowersox, 198 F.3d 1039 , 1047 n. 8 (8th Cir.1999) (“if a state court ignores a potential procedural bar and reaches the merits of a prisoner’s claim, the federal habeas courts may consider the claim”) (citing Shaddy v. Clarke, 890 F.2d 1016, 1018 (8th Cir.1989)), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 886 , 121 S.Ct. 204 , 148 L.Ed.2d 143 (2000); cf. Rivera v. Goord, 253 F.Supp.2d 735, 749-50 (S.D.N.Y.2003) (finding failure to exhaust in § 1983 case, and noting that “[although DOCS rejected the grievan…
Perez-Montanez
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 00-5096.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 2000.
Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.