green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.7 score
“we review only issues which are argued specifically and distinctly in a party's opening brief.”
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ewing v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
we review only issues which are argued specifically and distinctly in a party's opening brief.
discussed
Cited "see"
Foster v. Gilliam
See Right-Price Recreation, LLC v. Connells Prairie Cmty. Council, 105 Wash.App. 813, 819 , 21 P.3d 1157 (2001) ("The issues in the two orders must be so entwined that to resolve the order appealed, the court must consider the order not appealed."), remanded, 146 Wash.2d 370 , 46 P.3d 789 (2002), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1149 , 124 S.Ct. 1147 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1043 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barak v. Zeff
See Pollux Holding, Ltd. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 329 F.3d 64, 74 (2d Cir.2003) (holding that “a plaintiffs choice of forum [does not] deservef ] presumptive deference simply because the chosen forum is defendant’s home forum”), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1149 , 124 S.Ct. 1145 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1041 (2004); Faber-Plast GmbH v. Kleinert, 997 F.Supp. 846, 848 (E.D.Mich.1998) (stating that “the fact that defendant is a Michigan resident who conducts business in this state does not necessarily mean that this is the proper forum for this action ”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sterten v. Option One Mortgage Corp. (In Re Sterten)
E.g., Williams v. Homestake Mortgage Co., 968 F.2d 1137, 1142 (11th Cir.1992) (finding legislative history expressed Congress’ intent to impose equitable conditions at any time during the rescission process); accord, Yamamoto v. Bank of New York, 329 F.3d 1167, 1173 (9th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1149 , 124 S.Ct. 1146 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1042 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Gwendolyn A. Ewing, Gwendolyn A. Ewing v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Yamamoto v. Bank of New York, 329 F.3d 1167 , 1169 n. 1 (9th Cir.2003) ("While their brief mentions the issue ... the issue is not argued and we deem it abandoned.”), cer t. denied, 540 U.S. 1149 , 124 S.Ct. 1146 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1042 (2004); Greenwood v. FAA, 28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir.1994) ("We review only issues which are argued specifically and distinctly in a party’s opening brief.”). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Medcam, Inc. v. Mcnc
See Bob Schultz Motors, Inc. v. Kawasaki Motors Corp., U.S.A., 334 F.3d 721, 726 (8th Cir.2003) (citing Houlihan v. Offerman & Co., 31 F.3d 692, 694-95 (8th Cir.1994)), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1149 , 124 S.Ct. 1147 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1042 (2004); Twin City Monorail, Inc. v. Robbins & Myers, Inc., 728 F.2d 1069, 1072 (8th Cir.1984) (stating that arbitration is a matter of contract law and that, absent an arbitration agreement regarding the particular dispute, a party may not be required to submit the dispute to arbitration) (citing United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U.S. 574, 5…
discussed
Cited "see"
MedCam, Inc. v. MCNC
See Bob Schultz Motors, Inc. v. Kawasaki Motors Corp., U.S.A., 334 F.3d 721, 726 (8th Cir.2003) (citing Houlihan v. Offerman & Co., 31 F.3d 692, 694-95 (8th Cir.1994)), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1149 , 124 S.Ct. 1147 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1042 (2004); Twin City Monorail, Inc. v. Robbins & Myers, Inc., 728.
cited
Cited "see"
Loughlin, Thomas P. v. United States
See Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64 (D.C.Cir.2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1149 , 124 S.Ct. 1146 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1042 (2004) (dismissal pursuant to Fed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nordeen v. Bank of America, N.A. (In Re Nordeen)
See, e.g., Yamamoto v. Bank of N.Y., 329 F.3d 1167, 1171 (9th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1149 , 124 S.Ct. 1146 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1042 (2004); LaGrone v. Johnson, 534 F.2d 1360, 1362 (9th Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
White v. Centex Home Equity Co., L.L.C. (In Re White)
See, e.g., Yamamoto v. Bank of New York, 329 F.3d 1167 (9th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1149 , 124 S.Ct. 1146 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1042 (2004); Williams v. Homestake Mortgage Co., 968 F.2d 1137, 1140-42 (11th Cir.1992); FDIC v. Hughes Dev.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bloomington Partners, LLC v. City of Bloomington
Co., 312 Ill.App.3d 972 , 245 Ill.Dec. 547 , 728 N.E.2d 629, 632 (2000); see also Hawkins v. Aid Ass’n for Lutherans, 338 F.3d 801, 806 (7th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1149 , 124 S.Ct. 1146 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1042 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pollux Holding, Ltd.
v.
Chase Manhattan Bank
v.
Chase Manhattan Bank
No. 03-412.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 20, 2004.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.